Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 10, Issue 10, pp 408–414 | Cite as

Dynamic plastic response of foil gages

Foil gages are compared with interferometric strain measurement for plastic impact. The two methods agree reasonably well
  • William N. SharpeJr.
Article

Abstract

Little research has been devoted to the accuracy of the response of resistance strain gages to dynamic plastic strain because of the lack of an easy-to-use comparative strain-measuring technique. The dynamic interferometric strain gage provides a suitable standard of comparison. Foil-gage response is compared directly with interferometric strain-gage response in a longitudinal-impact experiment. The accuracy of the foil gage does not decrease with increasing maximum strain (up to 8 percent). The error in shape of the strain wave does not vary drastically with distance from the point of impact. In contrast to previous work, foil gages are found to be reasonably accurate strain transducers for dynamic plastic strain.

Keywords

Mechanical Engineer Fluid Dynamics Strain Gage Resistance Strain Maximum Strain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cunningham, D. M. andGoldsmith, W., “Short-time Impulses Produced by Longitudinal Impact,”Proc. SESA XVI (2),153–165 (1958).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ripperger, E. A. andYeakley, L. M., “Measurement of Particle Velocities Associated with Waves Propagating in Bars,”Experimental Mechanics,3 (2),47–56 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oi, K., “Transient Response of Bonded Strain Gages,”Experimental Mechanics,6 (9),463–469 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bell, J. F., Discussion of “Instrumentation for High Speed Strain Measurement” by J. M. Kraft, Response of Metals to High Velocity Deformation, Interscience Publishers, New York, 48–49 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gillich, W. J., “The Response of Bonded Wire Resistance Strain Gauges to Large Amplitude Waves in Annealed Aluminum”, unpublished master's essay, The Johns Hopkins University (1960).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiddister, J. L. andMalvern, L. E., “Compression-impact Testing of Aluminum at Elevated Temperatures,”Experimental Mechanics,3 (4),81–90 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malvern, L. E., “Experimental Studies of Strain-Rate Effects and Plastic-Wave Propagation in Annealed Aluminum,”Behavior of Materials Under Dynamic Loading, ASME, New York, 81–92 (1965).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharpe, W. N., Jr., “The Interferometric Strain Gage,”Experimental Mechanics,8 (4),164–170 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sharpe, W. N., Jr., “Dynamic Strain Measurements with the Interferometric Strain Gage,”Experimental Mechanics,10 (2),89–92 (1970).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vigness I., “Magnetostrictive Effects in Wire Strain Gages,”Proc. SESA XIV (2),140–148 (1956).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • William N. SharpeJr.

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations