Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 33–42 | Cite as

Structural change in federal spending and deficits: Legislative and cyclical influences

  • Timothy J. Perri
  • Gary L. Shelley


This paper analyzes the behavior of federal expenditures and budget deficits since 1955. It is found that growth in these series is well described by two simple step functions allowing for three discrete increases in the means of the variables. When adjusted for the changes in means, both series are stationary with no significant time trend. It is found that the increases in means are associated with government attempts to implement countercyclical fiscal policy during recessions. Also, the increases in means coincide well with specific legislative acts which increased the budgetary power of individual members of Congress and ended the ability of the president to use impoundment as a substitute for a line-item veto.


International Economic Public Finance Time Trend Step Function Significant Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blinder, Alan S. "Temporary Income Taxes and Consumer Spending,"Journal of Political Economy, 89, 1981, pp. 26–53.Google Scholar
  2. Fisher, L.Presidential Spending Power, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. Kramer, I. R. "The Impoundment Control Act of 1974: An Unconstitutional Solution to a Constitutional Problem,"University of Missouri - Kansas City Law Review, 58, 1990, pp. 157–77.Google Scholar
  4. Kremers, Jeroen J. M. "U.S. Federal Indebtedness and the Conduct of Fiscal Policy,"Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 1989, pp. 219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Middlekauff, W. B. "Twisting the President's Arm: The Impoundment Control Act as a Tool for Enforcing the Principle of Appropriation Expenditure,"Yale Law Journal, 100, 1990, pp. 209–28.Google Scholar
  6. Schick, A. "The Distributive Congress," in A. Schick, ed.,Making Economic Policy in Congress, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 1983, pp. 257–73.Google Scholar
  7. Shepsle, K. A.; Weingast, B. R. "Policy Consequences of Government by Congressional Subcommittees," in C. L. Harris, ed.,Control of Federal Spending, New York, NY: Academy of Political Science, 1983, pp. 114–31.Google Scholar
  8. Stanton, N. "History and Practice of Executive Impoundment of Appropriated Funds,"Nebraska Law Review, 53, 1974, pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
  9. Tanner, Evan; Liu, Peter. "Is the Budget Deficit Too Large? Some Further Evidence,"Economic Inquiry, 32, 1994, pp. 511–8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Timothy J. Perri
    • 1
  • Gary L. Shelley
    • 1
  1. 1.Appalachian State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations