Abstract
The surface integrity of inconel-718 nickel-base superalloy was investigated using orthogonal cutting at various cutting speeds, depths of cut and chip-tool contact lengths under lubricated conditions. The experimental work involved the determination of residual stress, plastic strain and microhardness distribution in the surface region and the examination of the surface and subsurface using scanning electron and optical microscopy. Both residual stresses and plastic strains decreased and the quality of the mechined surface improved with an increase in cutting speed, a decrease in depth of cut and with tools having controlled chip-tool contact lengths. The results were interpreted in terms of the variation in shear plane length and consequently the variation in tool forces with cutting conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Field, M. andKahles, J.A., “The Surface Integrity of Mechined and Ground High-Strength Steel,”DMIC Rep. 210, Defense Material Information Center, Cameron, Station, Alexandria, VA 22304–6145 (Oct. 1974).
Field, M. andKahles, J.F., “Review of Surface Integrity of Machined Components,”Annals CIRP,20 (2),153 (1971).
Field, M. andKahles, J.F., “A Review of Measuring Methods for Surface Integrity,”Annal CIRP,21,219 (1972).
Zlatin, N., Field, M. andKoster, W.P., “Surface Integrity of Machined Structural Components,”Interim Rep. IR-708-8 (III), Contract No. F33615-68-C-1003 Metcut Research Associates, Inc., Cincinnati (June 1968).
Zlatin, N., Field, M. andKoster, W.P., “Parameters on New and Selective Aerospace,”Rep. AFML TR-67-339 (AD 857001), Metcut Research Associates, Inc., Cincinnati, (March 1969).
Field, M., Koster, W.P., et al., “Machining of High Strength Steels with Emphasis on Surface Intergrity,” Air Force Machinability Data Center, 70-1 (1970).
Field, M., Koster, W.P. and Kahles, J.F., “Surface Integrity in Machnining and Grinding,” ASTME Tech. Rep. No. MR 67-142 (1967).
Kahles, J.F. andField, M., “Surface Intergrity — A New Requirement for Surface Generated by Material Removal Methods,”Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.,182,31 (1968).
Koster, W.P., et al., “Surface Integrity of Machined Structural Components,”Interim Rep. No. IR-721-8(1), Metcut Research Associates, Inc., Cincinnati (1968).
Bellows, G., “Impact of Nonconventional Material Removal Processes on the Surface Integrity of Materials,” ASTME Tech, Rep. No. MR 68–518 (1968).
Bailey, J.A., “Surface Damage during Machining of Annealed 18% Ni-Maraging Steel-I-Unlubricated Conditions,”Wear,42,277 (1977).
Bailey, J.A., “Surface Damage During Machining of Anneaded 18% Ni-Maraging Steel-II-Lubricated Conditions,”Wear,42,297 (1977).
Bailey, J.A. and Jeelani, S., “Surface Integrity in Machining 18% Nickel Maraging Steel,” SME Tech. Paper No. IQ 74–185 (1974).
Koster, W.P., et al., “Surface Integrity of Machnined Structural Components”Final Rep. AFML-TR-70-11 (AD-870-146), Metcut Research Associates Inc., Cininnati (1970).
Koster, W.P., et al., “Manufacturing Methods for Surface Integrity of Machined Structural Components,”Final Rep. AFML-TR-71-258 (AD-893-765), Metcut Research Associates Inc., Cininnati (1972).
Sadat, A.B. andBailey, J.A., “Residual Stresses in Turned AISI 4340 Steel,”Experimental Mechanics,27,1,80 (1987).
Sadat, A.B., and Reddy, M.Y.K., “Plastic Strain Analysis of the Machined Surface Region Using Fine Grid Etched by Photoresist Technique,”Experimental Mechanics,29 (3), (1989).
Ernst, H. andMerchant, M.E., “Chip Formation, Friction and High Quality Machined Surface,”Surface Treatment of Metals, ASM,29,299 (1941).
Sadat, A.B., Reddy, M.Y. andWant, B.P., “Plastic Deformation Analysis in Machining of Inconel-7189 Nickel Base Superalloy Using Both Experimental and Numerical Method”Int. J. Mech. Sci.,33 (10),829–842 (1991).
Drucker, D.C., “An Analysis of the Mechanics of Metal Cutting,”J. Appl. Phys.,20,1013. 19 (1949).
Wright, P.K. and Robinson, J.L., “Material Behavior in Deformation Zone of Machining Operation,” Med. Tech., 240–248 (May 1977).
Reddy, M.Y., “An Experimental Study of the Effect of Machining Variables on the Surface Integrity of Inconel-718 Superalloy,” PhD Diss., Dept. Mech. Eng., The University of Texas at Arlington (1989).
Bailey, J.A. andElkhabeery, M.M., “Surface Integrity in Machining Solution-Treated and Aged 2024-Aluminum Alloy, Using Natural and Controlled Contact Tools. Part II — Lubricated Condition,”J. Eng., Mat. and Tech., ASME,106,161–164 (1984).
Colwell, L.V., Sinnot, M.J. and Tobin, J.C., “The Determination of Residual Stresses in Hardened, Ground Steel,” Trans. ASME, 1099 (Oct. 1955).
Tsuchida, K., Kawada, Y., andKodamer, S., “A Study of Residual Stress Distribution by Turning,”Bul. JSME,18 (116)123–130 (1975).
Okushima, K. andKakino, Y., “The Residual Stress Produced by Metal Cutting,”Annuals of CIRP,20 (1),13–14 (1941).
Sadat, A.B., “Surface Characteristics of Machined Inconel-718 Nickel Base Superalloy Using Natural and Controlled Contact Length Tools,”Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. and Rech.,27 (3), (1987).
Sadat, A.B., andBailey, J.A. “Some Observation of the Surface Damage of Machined Bearing Bronze,”Wear,108, (3),255 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadat, A.B., Reddy, M.Y. Surface integrity of inconel-718 nickel-base superalloy using controlled and natural contact length tools. part I: Lubricated. Experimental Mechanics 32, 282–288 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319367
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319367