Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 251–257 | Cite as

Development of a microtargeting device for particle bombardment of plant meristems

  • Christof Sautter
Special Section On Particle Bombardment

Abstract

A gene transfer system for meristem cells was developed on the basis of a ballistic approach. In order to meet some important prerequisites for an efficient transfer system, such as for example aiming at small tissues and control of penetration of the microprojectiles, we developed an acceleration system fundamentally different from the usual macroprojectile driven approach. Instead of a macroprojectile, microtargeting uses the law of Bernoulli for accleration of highly uniform-sized gold particles. The system is able to deliver 80% of the particles to an area as small as 150 micron in diameter, which corresponds to the size of a meristem. Microtargeting yields gene delivery (measured as number of transiently GUS expressing cells to up to 3% of the cells exposed in the target area or up to 35 × 103 cells per cm2. Stable transformation of tobacco microcolonies with the microtargeting device was shown to have an efficiency up to one stable transformant per 1000 cells exposed to the shot, or up to one transformant per shot. We perform 4 or 5 shots per min. After 30 to 40 shots, reloading can take up to 2 min. Microtargeting is very flexible and allows for the adjustment of the important parameters to fit the requirements of the respective tissue.

Key words

ballistic aiming glucuronidase gold particles microprojectiles Nicotiana tabacum L. tobacco Triticum aestivum L. wheat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batty NP & Evans JM (1992) Biological ballistics — no longer a shot in the dark. Transgenic Research 1: 107–113Google Scholar
  2. Butow RA & Fox TD (1990) Organelle transformation: shoot first, ask questions later. TIBS 15: 465–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Christou P (1992) Genetic transformation of crop plants using microprojectile bombardment. The Plant Journal 2: 275–281Google Scholar
  4. Iida A, Seki M, Kamada M, Yamada Y & Morikawa H (1990) Gene delivery into cultured plant cells by DNA-coated gold particles accelerated by a pneumatic particle gun. Theor. Appl. Genet. 80: 813–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA & Bevan MW (1987) GUS-fusions: Glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J. 6: 3901–3907PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Klein TM, Wolf ED, Wu R & Sanford JC (1987) High velocity microprojectiles for delivering nucleic acids into living cells. Nature 327: 70–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klein TM, Fromm M, Weissinger A, Tomes D, Schaaf S, Sletten M & Sanford JC (1988) Transfer of foreign genes into intact maize cells with high velocity microprojectiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 4305–4309Google Scholar
  8. Klein TM, Arentzen R, Lewis PA & Fitzpatrick-McElligott S (1992) Transformation of microbes, plants and animals by particle bombardment. Biotechnology 10: 286–291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Maliga P, Broznovits A & Marton L (1973) Streptomycin-resistant plant from callus cultures of haploid tobacco. Nature 244: 29–30Google Scholar
  10. Mendel RR, Müller B, Schulze J, Kolosnikow V & Zelenin A (1989) Delivery of foreign genes to intact barley cells by high-velocity microprojectiles. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 31–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oard JH, Paige DF, Simmonds JA & Gradziel TM (1989) Transient gene expression in maize, rice, and wheat cells using an airgun apparatus. Plant Physiol. 92: 334–339Google Scholar
  12. Potrykus I (1990) Gene transfer to cereals: an assessment. Biotechnology 8: 535–542Google Scholar
  13. Russell JA, Mihir KR & Sanford JC (1992) Physical trauma and tungsten toxicity reduce the efficiency of biolistic transformation. Plant Physiol. 98: 1050–1056Google Scholar
  14. Sanford JC, Klein TM, Wolf ED & Allen N (1987) Delivery of substances into cells and tissues using a particle bombardment process. Particulate Science Technology 5: 27–37Google Scholar
  15. Sautter C, Waldner H, Neuhaus-Url G, Galli A, Neuhaus G & Potrykus I (1991) Micro-targeting: high efficiency gene transfer using a novel approach for the acceleration of microprojectiles. Biotechnology 9: 1080–1085PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Taylor MG & Vasil IK (1991) Histology of, and physical factors affecting, transient GUS expression in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br) embryos following microprojectile bombardment. Plant Cell Rep. 10: 120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vasil V, Castillo AM, Fromm ME & Vasil IK (1992) Herbicide resistant fertile transgenic wheat plants obtained by microprojectile bombardment of regenerable embryogenic callus. Biotechnology 10: 667–674Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christof Sautter
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Plant SciencesSwiss Federal Institute of TechnologyZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations