Skip to main content
Log in

Determination of fracture toughness by photoelastic coating

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The photoelastic-coating method was applied to the determination of fracture toughness in aluminum plates. The specimens were plates with a central transverse crack. Determinations were made first by the compliance method. The specimens were loaded statically to failure. The opening displacement across the crack was measured with a clip gage. In using this photoelastic-coating method, the stress-intensity factor was obtained in terms of the radius and fringe order of various isochromatic fringe loops using an extrapolation law. An apparent stress-intensity factor was obtained from several isochromatic fringe patterns away from the crack tip and then extrapolated to the crack tip to determine the true value. Results obtained by the photoelastic-coating method are higher than those obtained by the compliance method for all loads, due to the bluntness of the crack tip in the first set of specimens. Theoretical predictions fall between the compliance method and photoelastic-coating results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kobayashi, A.S., ed., Experimental Techniques in Fracture Mechanics,I and II,SESA Monograph, Iowa State Univ. Press (1973, 1975).

  2. Irwin, G., Discussion of “The Dynamic Stress Distribution Surrounding A Running Crack—A Photoelastic Analysis,”by A.A. Wells and D. Post, Proc. SESA,16,69–96 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bradley, W.B. andKobayashi, A.S., “An Investigation of Propagating Cracks by Dynamic Photoelasticity,”Experimental Mechanics,10,106–113 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, C.W., “Photoelasticity in Fracture Mechanics,”Experimental Mechanics,20,390–396 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dally, J.W., “Dynamic Photoelastic Studies of Fracture,”Experimental Mechanics,19,349–361 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Van Elst, H.C., Dynamic Crack Propagation, ed. G.C. Sih, Noordhoff Int. Publ., Leyden, 283–332 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daniel, I.M. andRowlands, R.E., “On Wave and Fracture Propagation in Rock Media,”Experimental Mechanics,15 (12),449–457 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kobayashi, T. and Dally, J.W., “Dynamic Photoelastic Determination of å-K Relation for 4340 Steel,” ASTM STP (1979).

  9. Daniel, I.M., “Strain and Failure Analysis of Graphite/Epoxy Plates with Cracks,”Experimental Mechanics,18 (7),246–252 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. ASTM Standard E561-76T, “Tentative Recommended Practice for R-curve Determination.”

  11. Eftis, J. andLiebowitz, H., “On the Modified Westergaard Equations for Certain Plane Crack Problems,”Int. J. Fract. Mech.,8,383–392 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soo, H.C., Daniel, I.M. Determination of fracture toughness by photoelastic coating. Experimental Mechanics 27, 10–13 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02318857

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02318857

Keywords

Navigation