Advertisement

Experimental Mechanics

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 194–200 | Cite as

Analytical and experimental studies of the surface flaw

  • C. W. Smith
Symposium on the Surface Crack

Abstract

This paper uses the Newman-Raju model, the Paris crack-growth-rate law and a fixedR ratio to demonstrate the analytical considerations associated with predicting stress-intensity distributions and fatigue crack growth of surface flaws under conditions of small-scale yielding. Subsequently, problems which lie outside the realm of the model used in the analytical description are presented. It is concluded that, while the model employed provides remarkable predictive capability in a variety of surface-flaw problems, many exceptional cases remain to be modeled.

Keywords

Fatigue Experimental Study Mechanical Engineer Fluid Dynamics Fatigue Crack 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Griffith, A.A., “The Phenomena of Flow and Rupture in Solids,”Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., London, Series A,221,163–198 (1921).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Griffith, A.A., “The Theory of Rupture,” Proc. 1st Int. Cong. Appl. Mech., 55–63 (1924).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Irwin, G.R., “The Crack Extension Force for a Part Through Crack In a Plate,”J. Appl. Mech.,29,Trans. ASME,29,Series E,651–654 (Dec. 1962).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Green, A.E. andSneddon, I.N., “The Distribution of Stress in the Neighborhood of a Flat Elliptical Crack in an Elastic Solid,”Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.,46,159–164 (1950).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swedlow, J.L., ed., “The Surface Crack: Physical Problems and Computational Solutions,” Symp. Proc. ASME Comm. for Computing in Appl. Mech., Appl. Mech. Div. (Nov. 1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hilton, P.D. and Gifford, L.N., eds., Computational Fracture Mechanics-Nonlinear and 3-D Problems, ASME-PVP,85,AMD 61 (1984).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGowan, J.J., ed., “A Critical Evaluation of Numerical Solutions to the ‘Benchmark’ Surface Flaw Problem,”Experimental Mechanics,20 (8),253–264 (Aug. 1980).Full report available from Soc. for Exp. Mech.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang, J.B., ed., Part-Through Crack Fatigue Life Prediction, ASTM-STP 687 (Oct. 1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beevers, C.J., ed., The Measurement of Crack Length and Shape During Fracture and Fatigue, Eng. Mat. Advisory Services, Chameleon Press Ltd, London (1980).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sommer, E., Fracture Mechanics Evaluation of Surface Cracks (in German), Werkstofforschung und Technik, Springer Verlag (1984).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Larson, L.H., ed., Elastic-Plastic Fracture Mechanics, Martinus-Nijhoff (1985).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanninen, M.F. and Atluri, S.N., eds., Dynamic Fracture Mechanics, The Albert S. Kobayashi Anniversary Volume, Pergamon Press, Ltd. (1986).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Newman, J.C., Jr. and Raju, I.S., “Analyses of Surface Cracks in Finite Plates Under Tension or Bending Loads,” NASA-T.P. 1578 (Dec. 1979).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith, C.W., “Use of Optical Methods of Stress Analysis of Three Dimensional Crack Body Problems,”J. Opt. Eng.,21 (4),696–703 (July/Aug.1984).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, C.W., Post, D. andEpstein, J.S., “Algorithms and Restrictions in the Application of Optical Methods to Strees Intensity Factor Determination,”J. Theor. & Appl. Frac. Mech.,2,81–89 (1984).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, C.W. andKirby, G.C., “Stress Intensity Distributions and Width Correction Factors for Natural Cracks Approaching ‘Benchmark’ Crack Depths,”Fract. Mech.,15,ASTM-STP 833,118–129 (Sept.1984).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schroedl, M.A. and Smith, C.W., “Local Stresses Near Deep Surface Flaws Under Cylindrical Bending Fields,” Progress in Flaw Growth & Fracture Toughness Testing, ASTM STP 536, 45–63 (1973).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paris, P.C., Gomez, M.P. andAnderson, W.E., “A Rational Analytical Theory of Fatigue,”The Trend in Engineering,13,Univ. of Wash.,9–14 (1961).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Broek, D., “Ch. 10-Fatigue Crack Propagation,” Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Revised), Martinus-Nijhoff (1982).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, C.W., “Observations on Prediction of Non-Self Similar Sub-Critical Crack Growth and SIF Distributions,” Advances in Fracture Research (ICF5), 3–10 (1981).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith, C.W., Post, D. andNicoletto, G., “Prediction of Sub-Critical Crack Growth from Model Experiments,”Developments in Theoretical & Applied Mechanics,XI,167–179 (1982).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Newman, J.C., Jr. and Raju, I.S., “Prediction of Fatigue Crack Growth Patterns and Lives in Three Dimensional Cracked Bodies,” NASA TM-85787 (April 1984).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Elber, W., “The Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure,” Damage Tolerance in Aircraft Structures, ASTM-STP 486, 230–242 (1971).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jolles, M. andTortoriello, G., “Geometry Variations During Fatigue Growth of Surface Flaws,”Fract. Mech.,14,Part I, ASTM-STP 791,297–307 (1983).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Corn, D.L., “A Study of Cracking Techniques for Obtaining Partial Thickness Cracks of Pre-selected Depths and Shapes,”J. Eng. Frac. Mech.,3,45–50 (1971).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chang, J.B., “Assessment of the Sensitivity of Crack Growth Rate Constants to Predictive Accuracy of Part-Through Crack Fatigue Life Predictions,” Part-Through Crack Fatigue Life Predictions, ASTM-STP 687, 156–157 (1979).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smith, C.W., Peters, W.H., Hardrath, W.T. and Fleischman, T.S., “Stress Intensity Distributions in Nozzle Corner Cracks of Complex Geometry,”Trans. 5th Int. Conf. on Struct. Mech. in Reactor Tech.,6 (G414), (1979).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Underwood, J.H. andKendall, D.P., “Fracture Analysis of Thick-Wall Cylindrical Pressure Vessels,”J. Theor. & Appl. Frac. Mech.,2 (2),47–58 (1984).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hodulak, L., Kordisch, H., Kunzelmann, S. andSommer, E., “Influence of the Load Level on the Development of Part Through Cracks,”Int. J. Frac.,14,R35-R38 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith, C.W., “Optical Methods in Fracture Mechanics,”Fatigue & Fracture Assessment by Analysis & Testing, ASME PVP,103,1–8 (1986).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Smith, C.W. and Epstein, J.S., “Measurement of Three Dimensional Effects in Cracked Bodies,” Proc. V Int. Cong. on Exp. Mech., 102–110 (1984).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Newman, J.C., Jr., “A Crack Closure Model for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth Under Aircraft Spectrum Loading,” Methods & Models for Predicting Fatigue Crack Growth Under Random Loading, ASTM-STP 748, 53–84 (1981).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    McGowan, J.J. andLiu, H.W., “The Role of Three Dimensional Effects in Constant Amplitude Fatigue Crack Growth Testing”,J. Eng. Mat. & Tech., Trans. ASME,102, (4),341–346 (1980).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kumar, V., German, M.D., Wilkening, W.W., Andres, W.R., deLorenzi, H. and Mowbray, D.F., Advances in Elastic-Plastic Fracture Analysis, EPRI NP-3607, Final Report (Aug. 1984).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. W. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering Science and MechanicsVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburg

Personalised recommendations