Skip to main content

The methodological debate between carl menger and the german historicists

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, “The Historical vs. the Deductive Method in Political Economy,”Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1, October 1890.

  2. Samuel Bostaph,Epistemological Foundations of Methodological Conflict in Economics: The Case of the Nineteenth Century Methodenstreit, Ph.D. dissertation, July 1976.

  3. __, “On the Origin of Methodological Differences Among Economists and the Resolution of Resulting Conflicts Over Method,” paper presented at the University of Delaware to 1977 Symposium on Methodology, sponsored by the Institute for Humane Studies.

  4. Edwin G. Dolan, ed.,The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, Kansas City: Sheed & Ward, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert B. Ekeland, Jr. and Robert F. Hebert,A History of Economic Theory and Method, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charles Gide and Charles Rist,A History of Economic Doctrines, 2nd English ed., Boston: D.C. Heath, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis H. Haney,History of Economic Thought, 4th ed., New York: Macmillan, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Friedrich A. von Hayek, “CarlMenger,”Economica, November 1934.

  9. __, “The Austrian School,”International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 1968a.

  10. __, “Carl Menger,”International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 1968b.

  11. __, “The Place of Menger's Grundsätze in the History of Economic Thought,” in J.R. Hicks and W. Weber, eds.,Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, London: Oxford University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.S. Howey,The Rise of the Marginal Utility School, 1870–1889, Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  13. T.W. Hutchison,A Review of Economic Doctrines: 1870–1929, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  14. __, “Some Themes from ‘Investigations into Method,’” in John R. Hicks and W. Weber, eds.,Carl Menger and the Austrian School of Economics, London: Oxford University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  15. John Kells Ingram,A History of Political Economy, New enl. ed., 1915; reprinted, New York: Augustus M. Kelley, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, XVIII, 1872.

  17. W.T. Jones,Kant to Wittgenstein and Sartre, 2nd ed., New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Emil Kauder, “Intellectual and Political Roots of the Older Austrian School,”Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 17, 1958.

  19. __,A History of Marginal Utility Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harry Landreth,History of Economic Theory, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robert Lekachman,A History of Economic Ideas, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carl Menger,Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, 1871, translated into English asPrinciples of Economics, James F. Dingwell and Bert F. Hoselitz, eds., Glencoe, Illinois: Free Press, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  23. __,Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften und der Politischen Ökonomie insbesondere, 1883, translated into English asProblems of Economics and Sociology, Louis Schneider, ed., Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  24. __,Die Irrthümer des Historismus in der Deutschen Nationalökonomie, Vienna: Alfred Hölder, 1884. A paraphrased and abbreviated translation of most of the content of these letters can be found in Albion W. Small,Origins of Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ludwig von Mises,The Historical Setting of the Austrian School of Economics, New Rochelle, New York: Arlington House, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Philip Charles Newman,The Development of Economic Thought, New York: Prentice-Hall, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jacob Oser and William Blanchfield,The Evolution of Economic Thought, 3rd ed., New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Karl Popper,The poverty of Historicism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ingrid Hahne Rima,Development of Economic Analysis, 3rd ed., Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Eric Roll,A History of Economic Thought, 4th ed., Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wilhelm Roscher,Principles of Political Economy, 2 vols., translated from the 13th (1877) German ed., Chicago: Callaghan and Co., 1882.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gustav von Schmoller, “Zur Methodologie der Staats-und Sozialwissenschaften,” Schmollers Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft, 7, 1883. The article was reprinted, with minor changes, as “Die Schriften von K. Menger und W. Dilthey zur Methodologie der Staats-und Sozialwissenschaften,” in Gustav von Schmoller,Zur Litteraturgeschichte der Staats-und Sozialwissenschaften, Leipzig: Duncker and Humblot, 1888; reprint ed., Bibliography and Reference Series, No. 169, New York: Burt Franklyn, 1968. Page numbers given in references to this article are from the 1968 ed.; however, corresponding page numbers of the 1883 version are given in parentheses for cross-comparison.

  33. __,Die Volkswirtschaft, die Volkswirtschaftslehre und ihre Methode, Frankfurt: Vittorio Klosterman, 1949; reprint of the 1893 ed.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Joseph A. Schumpeter,Economic Doctrine and Method, translated from the 1924 German language ed., New York: Oxford University Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  35. __,History of Economic Analysis, London: Allen and Unwin, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  36. H.R. Seager, “Economics at Berlin and Vienna,”Journal of Political Economy, 1, 1893.

  37. Ben B. Seligman,Main Currents in Modern Economics, New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Vierteljahrschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Kulturgeschichte, XXXV, 1871.

  39. Knut Wicksell, “The New Edition of Menger's Grundsätze,” in Knut Wicksell,Selected Papers on Economic Theory, Erik Lindahl, ed., London: Geo. Allen and Unwin, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wilhelm Windelband,A History of Philosophy, rev. ed., 2 vols., New York: Macmillan, 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zeitschrift für die gesammte Staatswissenschaft, XXVIII, 1872.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

I would like to thank C. Addison Hickman and Laurence S. Moss for valuable criticisms of an earlier draft of this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bostaph, S. The methodological debate between carl menger and the german historicists. Atlantic Economic Journal 6, 3–16 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313305

Download citation

Keywords

  • International Economic
  • Public Finance
  • Methodological Debate
  • German Historicist