Study of factors influencing variation in size characteristics of fluvioglacial sediments

  • Paul M. Mather
Article

Abstract

Factor analysis using promax oblique rotation was used in a study of fluvioglacial sediments of Late Weichsilian (Wurm) age. The use of oblique rotation allowed a more realistic interpretation of the factors and understanding of relationships between sedimentsize classes. At the second-order level, two factors are operatable, one producing variations in the coarse-size range, the other in the fine-size range. The factors are uncorrelated and mutally unrelated. At the first-order level are six factors, four representing aspects of the second-order factor of coarse size and two representing the fine size. The factor producing the variation in the coarse size is the most important one. At the lowest level in the hierarchy scale are the individual size variables. Results show that the number of factors required to account for the variation in a sediment-size data set is a function of the scale at which the problem is examined.

Key words

factor analysis sedimentology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carroll, J. B., 1961, The nature of the data, or how to choose a correlation coefficient: Psychometrika, v. 26, no. 4, p. 347–372.Google Scholar
  2. Cattell, R. B., 1965, Factor analysis—introduction to essentials: Biometrics, v. 21, p. 190–210, 405–435.Google Scholar
  3. Cattell, R. B., 1966, The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis,in Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology: Rand, McNally & Co., Chicago, p. 174–243.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlberg, E. C., and Griffiths, J. C., 1967, Multivariate analysis of a sedimentary rock for evaluating effects of sedimentation processes: Am. Jour. Sci., v. 265, no. 12, p. 833–842.Google Scholar
  5. Davis, J. C., 1970, Information content of sediment-size analyses: Jour. Intern. Assoc. Math. Geol., v. 2, no. 2, p. 105–112.Google Scholar
  6. Doeglas, D. J., 1946, Interpreting the results of mechanical analyses: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 16, no. 1, p. 19–40.Google Scholar
  7. Griffiths, J. C., 1966a, Genetic model for the interpretative petrology of detrital sediments: Jour. Geology, v. 74, no. 5, p. 655–672.Google Scholar
  8. Griffiths, J. C., 1966b, Scientific method in the analysis of sediments: McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 508 p.Google Scholar
  9. Harbaugh, J. W., and Demirmen, F., 1964, Application of factor analysis to petrologic variation in Americus Limestone (Lower Permian), Kansas and Oklahoma: Kansas Geol. Survey Sp. Dist. Publ. 15, 40 p.Google Scholar
  10. Harman, H. H., 1967, Modern factor analysis (2nd ed.): Univ. Chicago Press, 474 p.Google Scholar
  11. Hendrickson, A. E., and White, P. O., 1964, PROMAX, A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure: British Jour. Stat. Psychol., v. 17, pt. 1, p. 65–70.Google Scholar
  12. Imbrie, J., 1963, Factor and vector analysis programs for analyzing geologic data: Off. Naval Res., Tech. Rept. No. 6, Geography Branch, 83 p.Google Scholar
  13. Imbrie, J., and van Andel, Tj. H., 1964, Vector analysis of heavy mineral data: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 75, no. 11, p. 1131–1156.Google Scholar
  14. Kaiser, H. F., 1963, Image analysis,in Problems in measuring change: Univ. Wisconsin Press, Madison, p. 156–166.Google Scholar
  15. Kaiser, H. F., 1970, A second-generation Little Jiffy: Psychometrika, v. 35, no. 4, p. 401–415.Google Scholar
  16. Klovan, J. E., 1966, Use of factor analysis in determining depositional environments from grain-size distributions: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 36, no. 1, p. 115–125.Google Scholar
  17. Lawley, D. N., and Maxwell, A. E., 1971, Factor analysis as a statistical method (2nd ed.): Butterworths, London, 159 p.Google Scholar
  18. Matalas, N. C., and Reiher, B. J., 1965, Some comments on the use of factor analysis: Water Resources Res. v. 3, no. 1, p. 213–223.Google Scholar
  19. Mather, P. M., 1969, Analysis of some Late Pleistocene sediments from south Lancashire and their relation to glacial and fluvioglacial processes: Unpubl. doctoral dissertation, Dept. Geography, Univ. of Nottingham, 179 p.Google Scholar
  20. Mather, P. M., 1970, Principal components and factor analysis: Computer Appl. in the Nat. and Soc. Sci., No. 10, Dept. Geography, Univ. of Nottingham, 53 p.Google Scholar
  21. McCammon, R. B., 1966, Principal components analysis and its application to large-scale correlation studies: Jour. Geology, v. 74, no. 5, p. 721–733.Google Scholar
  22. McCammon, R. B., 1968, Multiple component analysis and its application to the classification of environments: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 52, no. 11, p. 2178–2196.Google Scholar
  23. Miesch, A. T., Chao, E. C. T., and Cuttitta, F., 1966, Multivariate analysis of geochemical data on tektites: Jour. Geology, v. 74, no. 5, p. 673–691.Google Scholar
  24. Pettijohn, F. J., 1957, Sedimentary rocks (2nd ed.): Harper and Brothers, New York, 718 p.Google Scholar
  25. Spencer, D., 1963, The interpretation of grain size distribution curves of clastic sediments: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 33, no. 1, p. 180–191.Google Scholar
  26. Spencer, D., 1966, Factors affecting element distributions in a Silurian graptolite band: Chemical Geol., v. 1, no. 3, p. 221–249.Google Scholar
  27. Spencer, D., 1967, Factor analysis II: A description of the application of oblique solutions: Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst., Ref. No. 67-59, 25 p.Google Scholar
  28. Tanner, W. F., 1964, Modification of sediment size distributions: Jour. Sed. Pet., v. 34, no. 1, p. 156–164.Google Scholar
  29. Thurstone, L. L., 1947, Multiple factor analysis: Univ. Chicago Press, 535 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul M. Mather
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of NottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations