Skip to main content
Log in

Good teaching inputs do not correspond to desired responses in ecological neural networks

  • Published:
Neural Processing Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we analyze how supervised learning occurs in ecological neural networks, i.e. networks that interact with an autonomous external environment and, therefore, at least partially determine with their behavior their own input. Using an evolutionary method for selecting good teaching inputs we surprisingly find that to obtain a desired outputX it is better to use a teaching input different fromX. To explain this fact we claim that teaching inputs in ecological networks have two different effects: (a) to reduce the discrepancy between the actual output of the network and the teaching input, (b) to modify the network's behavior and, as a consequence, the network's learning experiences. Evolved teaching inputs appear to represent a compromise between these two needs. We finally show that evolved teaching inputs that are allowed to change during the learning process function differently at different stages of learning, first giving more weight to (b) and, later on, to (a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Parisi, F. Cecconi, S. Nolfi. Econets: Neural Networks that Learn in an Environment.Network, 1, pp. 149–168, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.E. Rumelhart, G.E. Hinton, R. J. Williams. Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D.E. Rumelhart, and J.L. McClelland (eds.),Parallel Distributed Processing Vol.1, Foundations, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.J. Holland.Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.L. Elman. Incremental learning, or the importance of starting small. Center for Research in Language,Technical Report 9101, University of California San Diego, 1991.

  5. K. Plunkett, and V. Marchman. U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: implications for child language acquisition.Cognition, 38, pp. 43–102, 1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nolfi, S., Parisi, D. Good teaching inputs do not correspond to desired responses in ecological neural networks. Neural Process Lett 1, 1–4 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310934

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310934

Keywords

Navigation