Instructional Science

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 151–167 | Cite as

Developmental theory in the classroom

  • Leslie Smith
Articles

Abstract

Two questions are discussed with reference to the role of developmental psychology in the understanding of classroom learning and teaching. One question is whether a developmental perspective provides an adequate basis for a theory of the classroom. The second question concerns the utility to teachers of the adoption of such a perspective. Both questions are discussed in response to a series of critical reviews of current applications of psychology to educatonal practices. Firstly, the adoption of a developmental perspective in classroom investigation is valid since: it is not clear which theoretical principles underpin teachers' practices; developmental theorising already constitutes a corpus of knowledge; the common culture in which teachers work includes developmentally-based applications; existing classroom research on children's learning sometimes lacks a developmental dimension. Secondly, it is argued that the application of a developmental perspective to the classroom is both distinctive and fertile. Instructional psychologists explicitly accept the need for classroom variables to be systematically investigated. Five examples of the application of a developmental perspective are discussed: task-analysis; the diagnosis of children's prior knowledge and the matching problem; learning strategies; assessment and criterion-referencing; methods of investigating children's thinking. Two conclusions are drawn. Firstly, further research is needed to explicate the theoretical principles underpinning teachers' practices. Secondly, further research is needed in the investigation of a developmental perspective in classroom settings. It is an empirical, and open, question as to which type of research will provide a preferential understanding of classroom learning and teaching.

Keywords

Prior Knowledge Critical Review Current Application Match Problem Theoretical Principle 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, L.W. (1984).Time and School Learning. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, N., Desforges, C., Cockburn, A. and Wilkinson, B. (1984).The Quality of School Learning Experiences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Boyle, R. (1983). The myth of Piaget's contribution to education. In S. Modgil, C. Modgil and G. Brown (Eds),Jean Piaget: an Interdisciplinary Critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Brainerd, C.J. (1978). The stage-question in cognitive-developmental theory.The Behavioral and Brain Sciences,2, 173–213.Google Scholar
  5. Brainerd, C.J. (1983).Recent Advances in Cognitive-Developmental Theory. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, G. (1983). Piaget's theory and educational psychology. In S. Modgil, C. Modgil and G. Brown (Eds),Jean Piaget: an Interdisciplinary Critique, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, G. and Desforges, C. (1979).Piaget's Theory: a Psychological Critique. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant, P.E. (1982). Editorial: Piaget's questions.British Journal of Psychology, 73, 157–161.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, R. and Richie, D. (1983). Problems in the theory of developmental sequences.Human Development, 26, 156–72.Google Scholar
  10. Carey, S. (1985).Conceptual Change in Childhood Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Carraher, T.N., Carraher, D.W. and Schliemann, A.D. (1985). Mathematics in the streets and in schools.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 21–29.Google Scholar
  12. Case, R. (1985).Intellectual Development. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Case, R. and Bereiter, C. (1984). From behaviourism to cognitive behaviourism to cognitive development.Instructional Science,13, 141–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chi, M. (1985). Interactive roles of knowledge and sorting, strategies in the development of organised sorting in recall taks. In S. Chipman, J. Segal and R. Glaser (Eds),Thinking and Learning Skills. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Claparède, E. (1913)Experimental Pedagogy and the Psychology of the Child. London: Amold.Google Scholar
  16. DES (1985a),Better Schools. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  17. DES (1985b).Catenote 3. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  18. DES (1985c).History in the Pirmary and Secondary Years: an HMI View. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  19. Dewey, J. (1916),Democracy and Education. New York: Collier MacMillan.Google Scholar
  20. Dewey, J. (1966).John Dewey: Selected Writings. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  21. Desforges, C. (1985). Training for the management of learning in the primary school. In H. Francis (Ed),Learning to Teach: Psychology in Teacher Training. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  22. Desforges, C. (1986). Developmental psychology applied to teacher training. In J. Harris (Ed),Child Psychology in Action. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  23. Desforges, C. and McNamara, D. (1977). One man's heuristic is another man's blindfold: some comments on applying social science to educational practice.British Journal of Teacher Education, 3, 27–39.Google Scholar
  24. Doise, W. and Mugny, G. (1984).The Social Development of the Intellect. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  25. Donaldson, M., Grieve, R. and Pratt, C. (1983).Early Childhood Development and Education. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work.Review of Educational Research,53, 159–99.Google Scholar
  27. Driver, R., Guesne, E. and Tiberghien, A. (1985).Children's Ideas in Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Feuerstein, R. (1980).Instrumental Enrichment. Baltimore: University Parks Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gelman, R. and Baillargeon, R. (1983). A review of some Piagetian concepts. In J. Flavell and E. Neimark (Eds),Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Ginsburg, H. P. (1981). Piaget and education. In I. Sigel, D. Brodzinsky and R. Golinkoff (Eds),New Directions in Piagetian Theory and Practice, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Ginsburg, H. P. (1985). Academic diagnosis. In J. Valsiner (Ed),The Role of the Individual Subject in Scientific Psychology. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  32. Glaser, R. and Resnick, L. (1972). Instructional psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 23, 207–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gipps, C., Steadman, S., Blackstone, T. and Stierer, B. (1983).Testing Children. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  34. Gray, W. M. (1978). A comparison of Piagetian theory and criterion-referenced measurement.Review of Educational Research, 48, 223–49.Google Scholar
  35. Hadow Report (1931).The Primary School. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  36. Harlen, W. (1985).Teaching and Learning in Primary Science. London: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  37. Harlen, W. and Osborne, R. (1985). A model for learning and teaching applied to primary science.Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 133–46.Google Scholar
  38. Hart, K. (1981). Ratios and proportions. In K. Hart (Ed),Children's Understanding of Mathematics 11–16. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  39. Hilgard, E. (1964). A perspective on the relationship between learning-theory and educational practices. In E. R. Hilgard (Ed),Theories of Learning and Instruction. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  40. Holt, J. (1969).How Children Fail. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  41. Inhelder, B., Sinclair, H. and Bovet, M. (1974).Learning and the Development of Cognition. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  42. Jackson, P. (1968).Life in Classrooms. London: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  43. James, W. (1899).Talks to Teachers. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
  44. Keil, E. C. (1981). Constraints on knowledge and development.Psychological Review, 88, 197–227.Google Scholar
  45. Kingma, J. and Koops, W. (1983). Piaget's tasks, traditional intelligence and achievement tests.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 278–90.Google Scholar
  46. Kitchener, R. F. (1983). Developmental explanations.Review of Metaphysics, 36, 791–817.Google Scholar
  47. Kuhn, D. (1979). The application of Piaget's theory of cognitive development to education.Harvard Educational Review, 49, 340–60.Google Scholar
  48. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (Eds),Criticism, and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Markman, E. M. (1983). Two different kinds of hierarchical organisation. In E. K. Scholnick (Ed),New Trends in Conceptual Representation, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. McCloskey, M. (1983). Intuitive physics.Scientific American, 248, 114–22.Google Scholar
  51. McNamara, D. (1976). On returning to the chalk-face: theory not into practice.British Journal of Teacher Education, 2, 147–60.Google Scholar
  52. McNamara, D. (1979).Paradigm lost: Thomas Kuhn and educational practice.British Educational Research Journal, 5, 167–73.Google Scholar
  53. McNamara, D. (1980). The outsider's arrogance: the failure of participant observation to understand classroom events.British Educational Research Journal, 6, 113–25.Google Scholar
  54. McNamara, D. and Desforges, C. (1978). The social sciences, teacher education and the objectification of craft knowledge.British Journal of Teacher Education, 4, 17–35.Google Scholar
  55. Miller, S. A. (1986). Parents' beliefs about their children's cognitive abilities.Developmental Psychology, 22, 276–84.Google Scholar
  56. Nagel, E. (1957). Determinism and development. In D. Harris (Ed),The Concept of Development. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  57. Neimark, E. (1982). Piaget's theory of formal operations. In B. Wolman (Ed),Handbook of Developmental Psychology. Engelwood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  58. Nitko, A.J. (1983).Educational Tests and Measurement: an Introduction. New York: Harcourt Brace & Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  59. Norman, D. (1978). Notes towards a theory of complex learning. In. A. Lesgold, J. Pellegrino, S. Fokkema and R. Glaser (Eds),Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  60. Osborne, R. and Freyberg, P. (1985).Learning in Science. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  61. Piaget, J. (1983).Le Possible et le Nécessaire. Vol. 2. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  62. Piaget, J. (1986). Essay on necessity.Human Development, 29, 301–14.Google Scholar
  63. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1961).Le Développement des Quantitiés Physiques chez l'Enfant. Second Edition. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar
  64. Plowden Report (1967).Children and their Primary Schools. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  65. Pintrich, P., Cross, D., Kozma, W. and McKeachie, W. (1986). Instructional psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 37, 611–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Popper, K.R. (1979). Objective Knowledge. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Scriven, M. (1977). Comments on Chapter 2. In R.C. Anderson, R. Spiro and W. Montague (Eds),Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  68. Shayer, M. and Adey, P. (1981).Towards a Science of Science Teaching. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  69. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.Google Scholar
  70. Siegler, R. S. (1983). Five generalizations about cognitive development.American Psychologist, 38, 263–77.Google Scholar
  71. Sigel, I. (1983). Cognitive development is structural and transformational. In L. S. Liben (Ed),Piaget and the Foundations of Knowledge, Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  72. Spens Report (1938).Secondary Education. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  73. Smith, L. (1984).Ability Learning. London: Further Education Unit.Google Scholar
  74. Smith, L. (1985). Making educational sense of Piaget's psychology.Oxford Review of Education, 11, 181–91.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, L. (1986a). From psychology to instruction. In J. Harris (Ed),Child Psychology in Action. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  76. Smith, L. (1986b). Common-core curriculum: a Piagetian conceptualisation.British Educational Research Journal, 12, 55–71.Google Scholar
  77. Smith, L. (1986c). Children's knowledge: a meta-analysis of Piaget's theory.Human Development, 29, 195–208.Google Scholar
  78. Smith, L. (1986d). General transferable ability: an interpretation of formal operational thinking.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4, 377–87.Google Scholar
  79. Smith, L. (1987). On Piaget on necessity. In J. Russell (Ed),Philosophical Perspectives on Mental Development. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  80. Smith, L. (submitted for publication). Do teachers need developmental theory?Google Scholar
  81. Uzgiris, I. and Hunt, J. (1975).Assessment in Infancy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  82. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Williams, E. and Shuard, H. (1970).Primary Mathematics Today. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Educational ResearchUniversity of LancasterLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations