Skip to main content
Log in

Spectroscopy and the classification of liquid stationary phases in gas-liquid chromatography

  • Originals
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A table of data for acidity, basicity, polarity and London potential for stationary phases is given. These provide guidance in choosing a stationary phase for a given task from the 26 substances listed. The indices are calculated from infra-red shifts of 1-chlorobutane and the visible wavelength shifts of l2 when they are dissolved in the stationary phases, from NMR estimates of acidity and basicity and from relative retention data. They replace the less reliable data of Burns and Hawkes. Methods of determining the indices are suggested that require only a gas chromatograph and can be applied by technicians with no specialized understanding of solution parameters. An attempt to add electron donoracceptor indices to the table was unsuccessful. A further table is given of the slopes of the log plots d(logt′)/dC for use in extrapolating from one homologue to another on these stationary phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. B. Littlewood, J. Gas Chromatogr.1, (11), 16 (1963).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. A. Keller, B. L. Karger, L. R. Snyder, in “Gas Chromatography 1970”, ed.R. Stock andS. G. Perry, Institute of Petroleum, London, 1971, p. 125.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Rohrschneider, J. Chromatogr.22, 6 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. O. McReynolds, J. Chromatogr. Sci.8, 685 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D. H. McCloskey, S. J. Hawkes, J. Chromatogr. Sci.13, 1 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. S. R. Lowry, G. L. Ritter, H. B. Woodruff, T. L. Isenhour., J. Chromatogr. Sci.14, 126 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Wold, K. Anderson, J. Chromatogr.80, 43 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. T. J. Stark, P. A. Larson, R. Dandenau, J. Chromatogr.279, 31 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. L. Lee, R. C. Kong, C. L. Wooley, J. C. Bradshaw, J. Chromatogr. Sci.22, 136 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Burns, S. J. Hawkes, J. Chromatogr. Sci.15, 185 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Hawkes, D. Grossman, A. Hartkopf, T. Isenhour, J. Leary, J. Parcher, S. Wold, J. Lancey, J. Chromatogr. Sci.13, 115 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. W. Ecknig, H. Kriegsmann, H. Rotzche, Ber. Bunsenges. Physik. Chem.71, 587 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. A. Yancey, private communication.

  14. W. A. Aue, V. Paramasigamani, J. Chromatogr.166, 253 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. U. Heldt, H. J. K. Koser, J. Chromatogr.192, 107 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. C. Weast, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 54th ed. CRC Press, Inc., Cleveland, Ohio, 1974, p. E221 (indexec under “Refraction, molar, of organic compounds”).

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. A. Benesi, J. H. Hildebrand, J. Am. Chem. Soc.71, 2703 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. K. F. Wong, S. Ng, Spectrochim. Acta,32A, 455 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. L. R. Snyder, in “Modern Practice of Liquid Chromatography”. ed.J. J. Kirkland, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1971, pp. 136–137.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. L. DeLigny, G. E. Berendsen, W. E. Hammers, A. G. Remijnse, J. Chromatogr.153, 252 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. Miller, M. S. Thesis, Oregon State University, 1981.

  22. E. E. Chong, M. S. Thesis, Oregon State University, 1982.

  23. V. Gutmann, “The donor-Acceptor Approach to Molecular Interactions”, Plenum Press, New York, 1978, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. E. Brady, D. Bjorkman, C. D. Herter, P. W. Carr, Anal. Chem.56, 278 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. R. J. Laub, R. L. Pecsok, J. Chromatogr.113, 47–68 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. G. E. Baiulescu, V. A. Ilie, “The Stationary Phase in Gas Chromatography”, Pergamon Press, New York, 1975, p. 146.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. H. Langer, C. Zahn, G. Pantaxoples, Chem. and Ind. (London) 1958, 1145.

  28. D. H. Desty, A. Goldup, W. T. Swanton, Nature (London)183, 107 (1959).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. The Merck Index, 9th Edition, Merck & Co., Rahway, NJ. 1976, p. 1301.

  30. R. C. Reid, T. K. Sherwood, “The Properties of Gases and Liquids”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966, p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. Partington, “An Advanced Treatise on Physical Chemistry” Vol 1., Longmans, Green, New York, 1949, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  32. K. M. Watson, Ind. Eng., Chem.23, 360 (1931).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. O. E. Schupp, J. S. Lewis, “Compilation of Gas Chromatographic Data”, Amer. Soc. Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA., 1971, Publication AMD-25A, S1, p. 67.

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. C. Reinbold, T. H. Risby, J. Chromatogr. Sci.13, 372 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. A. S. Zyuzko, N. G. Enikeeva, I. L. Zhuravleva, R. V. Golovnya, Izv. Vysshikh Uchebn Zavedenii, Pishchevaya Tekhnol., 1973, (3), 161.

  36. J. H. Hildebrand, J. M. Prausnitz, R. L. Scott, “Regular and Related Solutions”, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1970, p. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  37. N. D. Petsev, Khr. Dimitrov, Dokl. Bolgar. Akad. Nauk.25, 775 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chong, E., deBriceno, B., Miller, G. et al. Spectroscopy and the classification of liquid stationary phases in gas-liquid chromatography. Chromatographia 20, 293–302 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310386

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310386

Key Words

Navigation