Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 65–74 | Cite as

Complex congenital cardiovascular anomalies evaluated by continuous-rotation computed tomography in children

  • Tetsuhisa Yamada
  • Junta Harada
  • Shimpei Tada
Article

Summary

The slip ring and nutate/rotate configuration of the new, fourth-generation, computed tomography (CT) (TCT-900S, Toshiba Medical Company) makes it possible to scan consecutively 25 slices every 75 s. This scanner also rapidly provides hemodynamic and multiplanar reconstruction images. Studies were performed on 13 children with various forms of complex congenital cardiovascular anomalies. The findings correlated very well with those by angiocardiography and echocardiography. But the cardiac valves were difficult to scan, and combined use with echocardiography was considered to be indispensable. The rapid multiplanar reconstruction imaging is very effective in depicting coarctation of the aortic isthmus, ductus arteriosus, and hypoplasia of the great arteries in newborns and infants who have small target regions. Cine-displays of such images can clearly show ventricular and atrial septal defects. This new CT system proved effective in diagnosing complex congenital cardiovascular anomalies even in young infants.

Key words

Image display and recording Computed tomography Children Congenital heart disease 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arciniegas JG, Soto B, Coghlan HC, Bargeron LM (1981) Congenital heart malformations: sequential angiographic analysis.AJR 137:678–681Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Didier DD, Higgins CB, Fisher MR, Osaki L, Silverman NH, Cheitlin MD (1986) Congenital heart disease: gated MR imaging in 72 patients.Radiology 158:227–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Eldredge WJ, Flicker S (1987) Evaluation of congenital heart disease using cine-CT.Am J Cardiac Imaging 1:38–50Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Farmer DW, Lipton MJ, Webb WR, Ringertz H, Higgins CB (1984) Computed tomography in congenital heart disease.J Comput Assist Tomogr 8:677–687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fletcher BD, Jacobstein MD, Nelson AD, Riemenschneider TA, Alfidi RJ (1984) Gated magnetic resonance imaging of congenital cardiac malformations.Radiology 150:137–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Foale R, Stefanini L, Rickards A, Somerville J (1982) Left and right ventricular morphology in complex congenital heart disease defined by two dimensional echocardiography.Am J Cardiol 49:93–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goodwin JD, Herfkens RJ, Brundage BH, Lipton MJ (1981) Evaluation of coarctation of the aorta by computed tomography.J Comput Assist Tomogr 5:153–156Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huhta JC, Hagler DJ, Seward JB, Tajik AJ, Julsrud PR, Ritter DG (1982) Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of dextrocardia: a segmental approach.Am J Cardiol 50:1351–1360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schulthness GK, Higashino SM, Higgins SS, Didier D, Fisher MR, Higgins CB (1986) Coarctation of the aorta: MR imaging.Radiology 158:469–474Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smallhorn JF, Huhta JC, Adams PA, Anderson RH, Wilkinson JL, McCartney FJ (1983) Cross-sectional echocardiographic assessment of coarctation in the sick neonate and infant.Br Heart J 50:349–361PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Van Praagh R (1972) The segmental approach to diagnosis in congenital heart disease.Birth Defects 8:4–23Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tetsuhisa Yamada
    • 1
  • Junta Harada
    • 1
  • Shimpei Tada
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyJikei University School of MedicineMinato-ku, TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations