Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integral labor costs for substantiation of hydropower construction alternatives

  • Published:
Hydrotechnical Construction Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The performed investigation showed that the evaluation of power construction alternatives and the substantiation of the parameters of hydraulic developments with the aid of the current methods of economic analysis and with direct comparison of the labor in man-days may lead to different conclusions with respect to the comparative effectiveness of the examined alternatives and the most advisable parameters of the hydraulic developments.

  2. 2.

    Under the conditions of the increasing strain in the labor balance, it is advisable to continue to improve the existing methods of evaluation of the effectiveness of power construction alternatives in the direction of taking into account the live labor. The problem of improving these methods is highly topical for construction of hydropower projects in connection with the great difference which ordinarily occurs in the quantity of the enlisted labor resources in the hydroelectric plant construction alternative and in the other alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  1. S. G. Strumilin, “Optimum planning criteria,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 4 (1968).

  2. T. S. Khachaturov, “Aspects of the determination of the coefficients of efficiency of capital investments,” in: Aspects of the Measurement of the Efficiency of Capital Investments [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. S. Khachaturov, Soviet Economics in the Present Stage [in Russian], Mysl', Moscow (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. S. Vainshtein, “Methods of determination of the economic efficiency of new construction technology,” in: Sb. Nauchnoi Inf., No, 17, Nauka, Moscow (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. “Survey of meeting on problem of optimum planning and direction of the national economy,” Ekon. Mat. Metody,7, No. 2 (1972).

  6. V. P. Krasovskii, “The integral effect and the time factor,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 8 (1974).

  7. A. A. Beschinskii and Yu. M. Kogan, Economic Problems of Electrification [in Russian], Energiya, Moscow (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. V. S. Nemchinov, “Methods of study of the factors of increase in the labor productivity in the agriculture,” Vestn. Sel'skokhozyaistvennoi Nauk, No, 5 (1958).

  9. S. G. Strumilin, Selected Works [in Russian], Vol. 4, Nauka, Moscow (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Bugutskii and I. Bulakh, “Study of the productivity of total labor costs in the agriculture,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 11 (1967).

  11. National Economy of the USSR in 1974 [in Russian], Statistika, Moscow (1975).

  12. N. Tikhonov, “Objective distribution criteria for labor,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 5 (1978).

  13. B. L. Erlikhman, “Determination of hydropower efficiency,” Gidrotekh. Stroit., No. 1 (1978).

  14. Ya. Kvasha, “Measurement of the efficiency of social production,” Vopr. Ekon., No. 5 (1974).

  15. G. Sorokin, “The Leninist methodology of study of the reproduction proportions,” Planovoe Khozyaistvo, No. 8 (1975).

Download references

Authors
  1. B. L. Érlikhman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 11, pp. 18–20, November, 1980.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Érlikhman, B.L. Integral labor costs for substantiation of hydropower construction alternatives. Hydrotechnical Construction 14, 1130–1134 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307990

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307990

Keywords

Search

Navigation