Abstract
The present study examines uses and effects of learner-control of the context or theme of practice examples on a statistics lesson in combination with learner control of the number of examples examined. Subjects were 227 undergraduate students assigned to 15 treatments formed by crossing five context conditions (learner control, education, business, sports, no-context) with three instructional support conditions (learner-control, maximum, minimum). No differences in achievement were attained as a function of either treatment variable. Findings showed, however, that learners who received preferred contexts (i.e., learner-control-context subjects) selected a greater number of examples than those who received prescribed contexts. In addition, achievement was positively related to the frequency with which subjects varied the number of examples selected across lessons. Despite the absence of achievement benefits, the learner-control-context strategy elicited highly favorable student reactions as a learning orientation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anand, P., & Ross, S. M. (1987). Using computer-assisted instruction to personalize math learning materials for elementary school children.Journal of Education Psychology, 79, 72–77.
Bush, W. S., & Fiala, A. (1986). Problem stories: A new twist on problem posing.Arithmetic Teacher, 33, 6–9.
Brown, J. I. (1976).Examiner's Manual The Nelson-Denny Reading Test. Chicago, IL: The Riverside Publishing Company.
Carrier, C., Davidson, G., & Williams, M. (1985). The selection of instructional options in a computer-based coordinate concept lesson.Education Communication Technology Journal, 33, 199–212.
Carrier, C. A., Davidson, G. V., Williams, M. D., & Kalweit, C. M. (1986). Instructional options and encouragement effects in a microcomputer-delivered concept lesson.Journal of Educational Research, 79, 222–229.
Carrier, C. A., & Williams, M. D. (1988). A test of one learner-control strategy with students of differing levels of task persistence.American Educational Research Journal, 25, 285–306.
Clark, R. E. (1984). Research on student thought processes during computer-based instruction.Journal of Instructional Development, 7, 2–5.
Clark, R. E. (1989). Current progress and future directions for research in instructional technology.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(1), 57–66.
Daruwalla, A. (1979).A study of the effectiveness of the use of the newspaper in the classroom on student achievement in 7th grade mathematics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Memphis State University.
Ferguson, A. M., & Fairbairn, J. (1985). Language experience for problem solving in mathematics.Reading Teacher, 38, 504–507.
Hannafin, M. J. (1984). Guidelines for using locus of instructional control in the design of computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Instructional Development, 7(3), 6–10.
Hansen, D. N., Ross, S. M., & Rakow, E. (1977). Adaptive models for computer-based training systems.Annual report to Naval Personnel Research and Development Center. Memphis, TN: Memphis State University.
Hays, W. L. (1981).Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Hepner, F. H., Anderson, J. G., Farstrup, A. E., & Weiderman, N. H. (1985). Reading performance in a standardized test is better from print than from computer display.Journal of Reading, 28, 321–325.
Hosmer, P. C. (1986). Students can write their own problems.Arithmetic Teacher, 33, 10–11.
Jones, B. M. (1983). Put your students in the picture for better problem solving.Arithmetic Teacher, 30, 30–32.
Keller, S. M., & Suzuki, K. (1988). Use of the ARCS motivation model in courseware design. In D. Jonassen (Ed.),Instructional designs for microcomputer courseware. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kinzie, M. B., & Sullivan, H. J. (1989). Continuing motivation, learner control, and CAI.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 5–14.
Kinzie, M. B., Sullivan, H. J., & Berdel, R. L. (1988). Learner control and achievement in science computer-assisted learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 299–303.
Leonardi, E. B., & McDonald, J. L. (1987). The micro in the English classroom: Shifting the emphasis from processing words to processing ideas.Educational Technology, 27(2), 15–17.
Mayer, R. E. (1984). Aids to text comprehension.Educational Psychologist, 19, 30–42.
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & O'Dell, J. K. (1988). Text density level as a design variable in instructional displays.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 36(2), 103–115.
Nitsch, K. E. (1977).Structuring decontextualized forms of knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University, Nashville.
Park, O., & Tennyson, R. D. (1986). Computer-based adaptive design strategies for response-sensitive sequencing and presentation forms of examples in coordinate concept learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 153–158.
Peterson, P. L. (1988). Making instruction meaningful: Lessons from research on cognition and instruction.Educational Psychologist, 23, 365–374.
Ross, S. M. (1983). Increasing the meaningfulness of quantitative material by adapting context to student background.Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 519–529.
Ross, S. M., & Anand, P. (1987). A computer-based strategy for personalizing verbal problems in teaching mathematics.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 35, 151–162.
Ross, S. M., McCormick, D., & Krisak, N. (1986). Adapting the thematic context of mathematical problems to student interests: Individual versus group-based strategies.Journal of Educational Research, 79, 245–252.
Ross, S. M., & Morrison, G. R. (1989). In search of a happy medium in instructional technology research: Issues concerning external validity, media replications, and learner control.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(1), 19–33.
Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., & O'Dell, J. K. (1988). Obtaining more out of less text inCBI: Effects of varied text density levels as a function of learner characteristics and control strategy.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 36(3), 131–142.
Ross, S. M., & Rakow, E. A. (1982). Adaptive instructional strategies for teaching rules in mathematics.Educational Communication Technology Journal, 30, 67–74.
Steinberg, E. R. (1977). Review of student control in computer-assisted instruction.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 3, 84–90.
Tennyson, R. D. (1980). Instructional control strategies and content structure as design variables in concept acquisition using computer-based instruction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 525–532.
Tennyson, R. D., & Buttrey, T. (1980). Advisement and management strategies as design variables in computer-assisted instruction.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 28, 169–176.
Tennyson, R. D., & Rothen, W. (1977). Pretask and on-task adaptive design strategies for selecting number of instances in concept acquisition.Journal of Educational Psychology, 5, 126–134.
Tobias, S. (1987). Mandatory text review and interaction with student characteristics.Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 154–161.
Winn, W. (1989). Toward a rationale and theoretical basis for educational technology.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(1), 35–46.
Wright, J. P., & Stevens, N. K. (1983). Improving verbal problem-solving performance.Arithmetic Teacher, 31, 40–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, S.M., Morrison, G.R. & O'Dell, J.K. Uses and effects of learner control of context and instructional support in computer-based instruction. ETR&D 37, 29–39 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307719
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02307719