Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 59–62 | Cite as

A measure of the synergy in mergers under a competitive market for corporate control

  • Philip C. Chang

Summary and Conclusion

This note developed a possible measure of the anticipated synergy in mergers under the assumption that the market for corporate control is competitive. By applying Tobin'sq theory of investment, a measure which is composed of three potentially measurable variables is derived. The three variables are: the acquisition premium paid by he buying firm, the market value, and the replacement costs of the target firm. This measure may be utilized to do empirical studies involving the synergy in mergers regardless of the type of the merger and the source of the synergy.

When the market for corporate control is not necessarily competitive, the inequality version of the measure gives the lower bound of the anticipated synergy and upper bound of the premium. In the special case of conglomerate mergers where economies of scope is the only source of synergy, the measure may also be interpreted as the present value of the anticipated economies of scope.


Empirical Study International Economic Public Finance Measurable Variable Competitive Market 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. W. J. Baumol, et al,Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure, Chicago: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. R. Brealey and S. Meyers,Principles of Corporate Finance, 2nd Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. E. F. Brigham,Financial Management Theory and Practice, 3rd Ed., Chicago: The Dryden Press, 1982.Google Scholar
  4. P. Chang,Conglomerate Mergers and the Pursuit of Economies of Scope, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Illinois, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. F. Hayashi, “Tobin's Marginalq and Averageq: A Neoclassical Interpretation,”Econometrica, 50, January 1982, pp. 513–24.Google Scholar
  6. M. C. Jensen and R. S. Ruback, “The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence,”Journal of Financial Economics, 11, April 1983, pp. 5–50.Google Scholar
  7. E. B. Lindenberg and S. A. Ross, “Tobin'sq Ratio and Industrial Organization,”Journal of Business, 54, January 1981, pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. H. G. Manne, “Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control,”Journal of Political Economy, 73, 1965, pp. 110–20.Google Scholar
  9. J. Tobin, “A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory,”Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1, February 1969, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar
  10. _____ and W. C. Brainard, “Pitfalls in Financial Model Building,”American Economic Review, May 1968, pp. 99–122.Google Scholar
  11. _____, “Asset Markets and the Cost of Capital,” inEconomic Progress, Private Values, and Public Policy, Cowles Foundation Paper No. 440, Amsterdam: North Holland Co., 1977.Google Scholar
  12. J. C. Van Horne,Financial Management and Policy, 6th Ed., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1983.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip C. Chang
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations