Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound-guided biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses by surgeons

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Recently, ultrasound (US)-guided needle biopsy has been proposed as an acceptable alternative to open biopsy in women with nonpalpable breast masses. This study evaluated the accuracy of US-guided needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses performed by surgeons at the time of the initial clinical examination.

Methods: Ultrasound-guided aspiration and/or core biopsy (US-GAB) was performed on 103 patients presenting with a nonpalpable, new, or increasing-size mass detected on mammography. Study patients included those whose US was classified as: fibroadenoma (FA) (n=26), complex cyst (n=32), indeterminate (complex cyst versus solid; N=24), or suspect (n=21).

Results: Of the 32 patients with diagnostic US of complex cyst, US-GAB confirmed 27 to be cysts. Twelve additional cysts were aspirated among the 24 indeterminate lesions. Sixteen FA were diagnosed on US-GAB; 11 of these underwent open biopsy and each was demonstrated to be a FA. Fibrocystic/benign-breast change (FBC) was diagnosed on 26 US-GAB; 15 of these underwent open biopsy, which demonstrated three FA and 12 FBC. Nine atypical lesions were diagnosed on US-GAB; six FBC, one papilloma, one FA, and one cancer were demonstrated on open biopsy. Seven cancers were diagnosed on US-GAB and all were confirmed on open biopsy. There were six insufficient specimens from US-GAB; four of these underwent open biopsy, which demonstrated two FA and two FBC.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided aspiration and/or core biopsy performed by surgeons in conjunction with the initial clinical examination can accurately diagnose nonpalpable, mammographically detected breast masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jackson VP. The role of ultrasound in breast imaging.Radiology 1990;177:305–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Basset LW, Kimme-Smith C. Breast sonography.AJR 1991;156:449–55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sailors DM, Crabtree JD, Land RL, Rose WB, Burns RP, Barker DE. Needle localization for nonpalpable breast lesions.Am Surgeon 1994;60:186–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilhelm NC, DeParedes ES, Pope T. The changing mammogram: a primary indication for needle localization biopsy.Arch Surg 1986;121:1311–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller RS, Adelman RW, Espinosa MH. The early detection of non-palpable breast carcinoma with needle localization: experience with 500 patients in a community hospital.Am Surgeon 1992;58:193–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dowlatshahi K, Gent HJ, Schmidt R, Jokich PM, Bibbo M, Sprenger E. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with stereotaxic localization and fine-needle aspiration.Radiology 1989;170:427–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dowlatshahi K, Yaremko ML, Kluskens LF, Jokich PM. Nonpalpable breast lesions: findings of stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology.Radiology 1991;181:745–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker SH, Lovin JD, Jobe WE, Burke BJ, Hopper KD, Yakes WF. Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies.Radiology 1990;177:305–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Staren E. Surgical office-based ultrasound of the breast.Am Surg 1995;61:619–627.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, et al. Ultrasound-guided automated large core breast biopsy.Radiology 1992;187:507–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leucht W.Teaching atlas of breast ultrasound. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dempsey PJ. Breast sonography: historical perspective, clinical application and image interpretation.Ultrasound Q 1988;6:69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McSweeney MB, Murphy CH. Whole breast sonography.Radiol Clin North Am 1985;23:157–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson VP, Rothschild PA, Kreipke DL, Mail JT, Holden RW. The spectrum of sonographic findings of fibroadenoma of the breast.Invest Radiol 1986;21:34–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson VP. Sonography of malignant breast disease.Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1989;10:119–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fornage BD. Interventional ultrasound of the breast. In: McGahan JP, ed.Interventional ultrasound. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1990:71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stavros AT, Dennis MA. An introduction to breast ultrasound. In: Parker SH, Jobe WE, eds.Percutaneous breast biopsy. New York: Raven Press, 1993:95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Parker SH. Percutaneous large core breast biopsy.Cancer 1994;74:256–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fornage BD, Faroux MJ, Simatos A. Breast masses: ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.Radiology 1987;162:409–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Parker SH. Needle selection. In: Parker SH, Jobe WE, eds.Percutaneous breast biopsy. New York: Raven Press, 1993:7–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Staren, E.D. Ultrasound-guided biopsy of nonpalpable breast masses by surgeons. Annals of Surgical Oncology 3, 476–482 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02305766

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02305766

Key Words

Navigation