Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 11–20 | Cite as

Campaign contributions by political parties ideologyvs. winning

  • Al Wilhite
  • John Theilmann
Articles

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. John R. Aldrich, “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party Activism,”American Political Science Review, 77, 1983a, pp. 974–90.Google Scholar
  2. _____, “A Spatial Model with Party Activists: Implications for Electoral Dynamics,”Public Choice, 41, 1983b, pp. 63–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Henry W. Chappell and William R. Keech, “Policy Motivation and Party Differences in a Dynamic Spatial Model of Party Competition,”American Political Science Review, 80, 1986, pp. 881–99.Google Scholar
  4. Aage R. Clausen,How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus, New York: St. Martins Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  5. _____ and Carl E. Van Horn, “The Congressional Response to a Decade of Change: 1963–1972,”Journal of Politics, August 1977.Google Scholar
  6. John L. Dobra and William Lee Eubank, “Political Survivorship: An Interest Group Perspective,”Southern Economic Journal, April 1985.Google Scholar
  7. Anthony Downs,An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper and Row, 1957.Google Scholar
  8. Alan Ehrenhalt, ed.,Politics in America, Members of Congress in Washington and at Home, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1980, 1982, 1984.Google Scholar
  9. James M. Enlow and Melvin J. Hinich,The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction, New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  10. Federal Election Commission,Report on Financial Activity, the Senate and House Election Cycle, 1979–80, 1981–82 (Washington, D.C.).Google Scholar
  11. Melvin J. Hinich and Peter C. Ordeshook, “Plurality Maximizationvs. Vote Maximization: A Spatial Analysis with Variable Participation,”American Political Science Review, September 1970, pp. 772–92.Google Scholar
  12. Gary C. Jacobson,Money in Congressional Elections, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
  13. _____, “Party Organization and Distribution of Campaign Resources: Republicans and Democrats in 1982,”Political Science Quarterly, Winter 1985–86, pp. 603–25.Google Scholar
  14. G. S. Maddala,Econometrics, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1977.Google Scholar
  15. Michael J. Malbin,Money and Politics in the United States, ed. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1984, pp. 292–94.Google Scholar
  16. _____ and Thomas W. Skaldony, “Appendix: Selected Campaign Finance Data, 1974–82,” in Michael Malbin, (ed.)Money and Politics in the United States, Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, 1984.Google Scholar
  17. Keith T. Poole and R. Steven Daniels, “Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress, 1959–1980,”American Political Science Review, 79, No. 2, June 1985, pp. 373–99.Google Scholar
  18. James A. Schlesinger, “The Primary Goals of Political Parties: A Clarification of Positive Theory,”The American Political Science Review, 69, No. 3, September 1975, pp. 840–49.Google Scholar
  19. William R. Shaffer, “Party and Ideology in the House of Representatives,”Western Political Quarterly, March 1982.Google Scholar
  20. Kenneth A. Shepsle, “The Strategy of Ambiguity: Uncertainty and Electoral Competition,”The American Political Science Review, June 1972.Google Scholar
  21. Julius Turner and Edward V. Schneier, Jr.,Party and Constituency: Pressure on Congress, Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  22. Donald Wittman, “Parties as Utility Maximizers,”American Political Science Review, 67, 1973, pp. 490–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Al Wilhite
    • 1
  • John Theilmann
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Alabama in Huntsville and Converse CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations