# Inconsistency in correcting for serial correlation in money-demand models

Articles

- 12 Downloads

## Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that none of the estimated coefficients obtained by applying the Cochrane-Orcutt technique to partial-adjustment money-demand models is dependable: each of the parameter estimates is inconsistent. The estimated coefficients of the explanatory variables will be biased even in large samples and can thus lead to misleading inferences about the income and interest-rate elasticities of the demand for money.

## Keywords

Parameter Estimate Explanatory Variable International Economic Public Finance Serial Correlation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- J. Aschheim and G. S. Tavlas, “Econometric Modeling of Partial-Adjustment: The Cochrane-Orcutt Procedure, Flaws and Remedies,”
*Economic Modeling*, forthcoming, 1988.Google Scholar - R. Betancourt and H. Kelejian, “Lagged Endogenous Variables and the Cochrane-Orcutt Procedure,”
*Econometrica*, 49, 1981, pp. 1703–78.Google Scholar - J. T. Boorman, “The Evidence on the Demand for Money: Theoretical Formulations and Empirical Results,”
*Monetary Macroeconomics*, T. Havrilesky and J. Boorman, eds., Arlington Heights, IL, 1977, pp.167–222.Google Scholar - D. Cochrane and G. H. Orcutt, “Application of Least Squares Regressions to Relationships Containing Auto-Correlated Error Terms,”
*Journal of the American Statistical Association*, 44, 1949, pp. 32–61.Google Scholar - T. Cooley and S. LeRoy, “Identification and Estimation of Money Demand,”
*American Economic Review*, 71, 1981, pp. 825–44.Google Scholar - J. M. Dufour, M. J. I. Gaudry, and R. W. Hafer, “A Warning on the Use of the Cochrane-Orcutt Procedure Based on a Money Demand Equation,”
*Empirical Economics*, 8, 1983, pp. 111–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - S. M. Goldfeld, “The Demand for Money Revisited,”
*Brookings Papers on Economic Activity*, 4, 1973, pp. 577–638.Google Scholar - R. G. Gordon, “The 1981–82 Velocity Decline: A Structural Shift in Income or Money Demand?,”
*Monetary Targeting and Velocity*, Conference Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 1983, pp. 67–99.Google Scholar - _____, “The Short Run Demand for Money: A Reconsideration,”
*Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking*, 16, 1984, pp. 403–34.Google Scholar - R. W. Hafer and S. E. Hein, “The Shift in Money Demand: What Really Happened?,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,
*Review*, 64, 1982, pp. 11–6.Google Scholar - M. Hamburger, “Recent Velocity Behavior, The Demand for Money and Monetary Policy,”
*Monetary Targeting and Velocity*, Conference Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 1983, pp. 11–6.Google Scholar - S. E. Hein, “Short Run Money Growth Volatility: Evidence of Misbehaving Money Demand?,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis,
*Review*, 64, 1982, pp. 27–36.Google Scholar - D. F. Hendry, “The Structure of Simultaneous Equations Estimators,”
*Journal of Econometrics*, 4, 1976, pp. 51–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - _____, and G. F. Mizon, “Serial Correlation as a Convenient Simplification, Not a Nuisance: A Comment on a Study of the Demand for Money by the Bank of England,”
*Economic Journal*, 88, 1978, pp. 549–63.Google Scholar - _____, and F. Srba, “The Properties of Autoregressive Instrumental Variables Estimators in Dynamic Systems,”
*Econometrica*, 45, 1977, pp. 969–90.Google Scholar - C. Hildreth and J. Y. Lu, “Demand Relationships with Autocorrelated Disturbances,”
*Technical Bulletin*, 276, Agricultural Experimental Station, Michigan State University, 1960.Google Scholar - C. G. Judge, W. E. Griffiths, R. C. Hill, H. Lutkepohl, and T. C. Lee,
*The Theory and Practice of Econometrics*, New York, 1985.Google Scholar - D. Laidler,
*The Demand for Money: Theories, Evidence, and Problems*, New York, 1985.Google Scholar - _____, “The Demand for Money in the United States—Yet Again,”
*On the State of Macro-Economics*, K. Brunner and A. Meltzer, eds., Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 12, Amsterdam, 1980, pp. 219–71.Google Scholar - _____, “Discussion,”
*Monetary Targeting and Velocity*, Conference Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 1983, pp. 100–03.Google Scholar - L. T. Oxley and C. J. Roberts, “Pitfalls in the Application of the Cochrane-Orcutt Technique,”
*Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics*, 44, 1982, pp. 227–40.Google Scholar - W. Poole, “Optimal Choice of Monetary Policy Instruments in a Simple Stochastic Macro Model,”
*Quarterly Journal of Economics*, 84, 1970, pp. 197–216.Google Scholar - J. D. Sargan, “Wages and Prices in the United Kingdom: A Study in Economic Methodology,”
*Colston Papers, 16*, London: Butterworth Scientific Publications, 1964.Google Scholar - R. Schonfeld, “A Useful Central Limit Theorem for
*m*-Dependent Random Variable,”*Metrikam*, 17, 1971, pp. 116–28.Google Scholar - J. Tatom, “Alternative Explanations of the 1982–83 Decline in Velocity,”
*Monetary Targeting and Velocity*, Conference Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 1983, pp. 22–56.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1987