Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 161–168 | Cite as

Sentinel lymph node metastasis in experimental melanoma: Relationships among primary tumor size, lymphatic vessel diameter and99mTc-labeled human serum albumin clearance

  • S. David Nathanson
  • Patricia Anaya
  • Mary Avery
  • Fred W. Hetzel
  • Terry Sarantou
  • Suzanne Havstad
Original Articles

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to investigate the relationships among primary tumor size, lymphatic vessel diameters, the incidence of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis and lymphatic clearance from murine footpad melanomas.

Methods: Lymphatic clearance (LC) of [99mTc]HSA from the middle of the footpad of syngeneic C57BL/6 mice, with or without primary melanomas (sizes varying from 1 to 5 mm in anteroposterior diameter), was quantitated using a gamma scintillation detection system. Lymphatic vessel diameters (LD) were measured after injection of aniline blue dye into footpad tumors. The incidence of SLN, femoral lymph node (FLN), and lung metastases was recorded.

Results: Metastasis to SLNs increased as tumor growth progressed (r=0.976, p=0.001), and there was a correlation between tumor size and both FLN (p=0.041) and lung (p=0.055) metastases. There was also a correlation between lymph node metastasis and LC (r=0.83, p=0.04) and LD (r=0.84, p=0.04).

Conclusions: These studies support the hypothesis that lymph flow and LD is increased in experimental murine melanomas and this relates to both primary tumor size and to lymphatic and hematogenous metastasis.

Key Words

Sentinel lymph node Radionuclide Lymph clearance Metastasis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reintgen D, Cruse CW, Wells K, Berman C, Fenske N, Glass F, Schroer K, et al. The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases.Ann Surg 1994;220:759–67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carr I. Lymphatic metastasis.Cancer Metastasis Rev 1983;2:307–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morton DL, Wen D-R, Wong JH, Economou JS, Cagle LA, Storm FK, Foshag LT, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.Arch Surg 1992;127:392–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nemoto T, Vana T, Bedwani RN, Baker HW, McGregor FH, Murphy GP. Management and survival of female breast cancer: Results of a national survey by the American College of Surgeons.Cancer 1980;45:2917–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    McGuire WL, Clark GM. Prognostic factors and treatment decisions in axillary-node-negative breast cancer.N Engl J Med 1992;326:1756–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balch CM, Murad TM, Soong S-J, Ingalls AL, Halpern NB, Maddox WA. A multifactorial analysis of melanoma: I. Prognostic histopathological features comparing Clark's and Breslow's staging methods.Ann Surg 1978;188:732–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nathanson SD, Haas GP, Mead MJ, Lee M. Spontaneous regional lymph node metastases of three variants of the B16 melanoma: relationship to primary tumor size and pulmonary metastases.J Surg Oncol 1986;33:41–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nathanson SD, Westrick P, Anaya P, Hetzel FW, Lee M. Lung metastases after curative or noncurative irradiation of microscopic primary melanomas.J Surg Oncol 1989;41:33–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kerbel RS. Growth dominance of the metastatic cancer cell: cellular and molecular aspect.Adv Cancer Res 1990;55:87–131.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liotta LA, Stetler-Sevenson WG.Principles of molecular cell biology of cancer: cancer metastatis. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds.Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993:134–49.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fidler IJ. The relationship of embolic homogeneity, number, size and viability to the incidence of experimental metastasis.Eur J Cancer 1973;9:223–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gullino PM, Granthum FH. The vascular space of growing tumors.Cancer Res 1964;24:1727–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moses MA.The role of vascularization in tumor metastasis. In: Orr FW, Buchanan MR, Weiss L, eds.Microcirculation in cancer metastasis. Boston: CRC Press, 1991:257–76.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Young JS, Lumsden CE, Stalker AL. The significance of “tissue pressure” of normal testicular and of neoplastic (Brown-Pearce carcinoma) tissue in the rabbit.J Pathol Bacteriol 1950;62:313–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wiig H, Tveit E, Hultborn R, Reed RK, Weiss L. Interstitial fluid pressure in DMBA-induced rat mammary tumours.Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1982;42:159–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nathanson SD, Nelson L. Interstitial fluid pressure in breast cancer, benign breast conditions and breast parenchyma.Ann Surg Oncol 1994;1:333–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Butler TP, Grantham FH, Gullino PM. Bulk transfer of fluid in the interstitial compartment of mammarey tumors.Cancer Res 1974;35:3084–8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang A, Eller MS, Hara M, Yaar M, Hirohashi S, Gilchrist BA. E-cadherin is the major mediator of human melanocyte adhesion to keratinocytes in vitro.J Cell Sci 1994;107:983–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wanebo HJ, Harpole D, Teates CD. Radionuclide lymphoscintigraphy with technetium 99m antimony sulfide colloid to identify lymphatic drainage of cutaneous melanoma at ambiguous sites in the head and neck and trunk.Cancer 1985;55:1403–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Avery M, Nathanson SD, Hetzel FW. Lymph Flow from murine footpad tumors before and after sublethal hyperthermia.Radiat Res 1992;132:50–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harley HO. The modified Gauss-Newton method for the fitting of nonlinear regression functions by least squares.Technometrics 1961;3:269–79.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Avery MA. Quantitative measurement and evaluation of lymphatic flow. PhD dissertation. Oakland University, Rochester, Michigan, 1992.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sandor T, Conroy MF, Hollenberg NK. The application of the method of maximum likelihood to the analysis of tracer kinetic data.Math Biosci 1976;9:149–59.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Beyer W.Handbook of tables for probability and statistics Cleveland: The Chemical Rubber Company, 1966.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fisher B, Fisher ER. The interrelationship of hematogenous and lymphatic tumor cell dissemination.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966;122:791–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nathanson SD, Schultz L, Tilley B, Kambouris A. Carcinomas of the colon and rectum: a comparison of staging classifications.Am Surg 1986;52:428–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Roh HD, Boucher Y, Kalnicki S, Buchsbaum R, Bloomer WD, Jain RK. Interstitial hypertension in carcinoma of the uterine cervix in patients: possible correlation with tumor oxygenation and radiation response.Cancer Res 1991;51:6695–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ackerman NB, Hechmer PA. Studies on the capillary permeability of experimental liver metastases.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1978;146:884–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jain RK. Interstitial transport in tumors.Adv Microcirc 1987;13:266–84.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hogan RD, Unthank JL. The initial lymphatics as sensors of interstitial fluid volume.Microvasc Res 1986;31:317–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zweifach BW, Silberberg A.The interstitial-lymphatic flow system. In: Guyton AC, Young DB, eds.International review of physiology—cardiovascular physiology III. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1979;188:215–60.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen HI, Granger HJ, Taylor AE. Interaction of capillary, interstitial and lymphatic forces in the canine hindpaw.Circ Res 1976;39:245–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yoffey JM, Courtice FC.Lymphatics, lymph and the lymphomyeloid complex. London: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Berman CG, Norman J, Cruse CW, Reintgen DS, Clark RA. Lymphoscintigraphy in malignant melanoma.Ann Plast Surg 1992;28:29–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ewing J.Neoplastic diseases: a treatise on tumors. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1941.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. David Nathanson
    • 1
  • Patricia Anaya
    • 1
  • Mary Avery
    • 1
  • Fred W. Hetzel
    • 3
  • Terry Sarantou
    • 1
  • Suzanne Havstad
    • 2
  1. 1.From the Department of SurgeryCase Western Reserve University at Henry Ford Health SystemDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Department of Research Epidemiology and BiostatisticsCase Western Reserve University at Henry Ford Health SystemDetroitUSA
  3. 3.Department of Radiation OncologyCase Western Reserve University at Henry Ford Health SystemDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations