Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 3–5 | Cite as

Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: A favorable opinion

  • David M. Ota


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic colectomy.Ann Surg 1992;216:703–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scoggin SD, Frazee RC, Snyder SK, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted bowel surgery.Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:747–50.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tate JJT, Kwok S, Dawson JW, Lau WY, Li AKC. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and conventional anterior resection.Br J Surg 1993;80:1396–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Peters WR, Bartels TL. Minimally invasive colectomy—are the potential benefits realized?Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:751–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen SM, Wexner SD. Laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer—the Cleveland Clinic Florida experience.Surg Oncol 1993;2:35–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Darzi A, Super P, Guillou PJ, Monson JRT. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy—total laparoscopic approach.Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:268–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoffman GC, Baker JW, Fitchett CW, Vansant JH. Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy—initial experience.Ann Surg 1994;219:732–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zucker KA, Pitcher DE, Martin DT, Ford RS, Greene, Cox. Laparoscopic-assisted colon resection.Surg Endosc 1994;8:12–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiggers T, Jeekel J, Arends JW, et al. No-touch isolation technique in colon cancer: a controlled prospective trial.Br J Surg 1988;75:409–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ota DM, Nelson H, Weeks JC. Controversies regarding laparoscopic colectomy for malignant diseases.Curr Opin Gen Surg 1994;1:208–13.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The French Association for Surgical Research. Curative resection for left colonic carcinoma—hemicolectomy vs. segmental colectomy: a prospective, controlled, multicenter trial.Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:651–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cady B. Lymph node metastasis: indicators but not govenors of survival.Arch Surg 1984;119:1067–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fusco MA, Paluzzi MW. Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for adenocarcinoma of the colon—report of a case.Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:858.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walsh DCA, Wattchow DA, Wilson TG. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic resection of malignancy.Aust N Z J Surg 1993;63:563–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nduka CC, Monson JRT, Menziewgow N, Darzi A. Abdominal wall metastases following laparoscopy.Br J Surg 1994;81:648–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy.Lancet 1994;344:58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Detsky AS, Naglie IG. A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.Ann Intern Med 1990;113:147–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nezhat C, Bess O, Admon D, Nezhat CH, Nezhat F. Hospital cost comparison between abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies.Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:713–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Apelgren KN, Blank ML, Slomski CA, Hadjsis NS. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc 1994;8:32–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fritts LL, Orlando R III. Laparoscopic appendectomy: a safety and cost analysis.Arch Surg 1993;128:521–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    MacFadyen BV, Lenz S. The economic considerations in laparoscopic surgery.Surg Endosc 1994;748–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Ota
    • 1
  1. 1.From the Division of Surgical OncologyUniversity of Missouri Ellis Fischel Cancer CenterColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations