Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 322–328 | Cite as

Surgical margins and prognostic factors in patients with thick (>4 mm) primary melanoma

  • Keith M. Heaton
  • Jeffrey J. Sussman
  • Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
  • Jeffrey E. Lee
  • Douglas S. Reintgen
  • Paul F. Mansfield
  • Merrick I. Ross
Original Articles

Abstract

Background: Randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of 1- and 2-cm excision margins for thin and intermediate-thickness melanomas, respectively. The optimal margin of excision for thick melanomas is still unknown, however. We evaluated whether the margins used for intermediate-thickness melanomas can be applied safely to thicker lesions.

Methods: The charts of 278 patients with thick primary melanomas treated between 1985 and 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with distant metastases at presentation or with follow-up less than 6 months were excluded. Median follow-up was 27 months. Known melanoma prognostic factors and excision margins were evaluated for their impact on local recurrence (LR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Median tumor thickness was 6.0 mm, and 57% were ulcerated. At presentation, 201 patients (72%) were node negative and 77 (28%) were node positive (palpable or occult). The 5-year OS and DFS rates were 55% and 30%, respectively. The LR rate for all patients was 12%. Although nodal status, thickness, and ulceration were significantly associated with OS by multivariate analysis, neither LR nor excisional margin (<2 cm vs. >2 cm) significantly affected DFS or OS in these patients.

Conclusions: Because margins of excision greater than 2 cm do not improve LR, DFS, or OS compared to a margin of 2 cm or less, a 2-cm margin of excision is adequate for patients with thick melanoma. Because nodal status is a significant prognostic factor in these patients, staging by sentinel node biopsy should be considered in patients with thick melanomas and clinically negative nodal basins to allow proper entry and stratification in adjuvant therapy trials.

Key Words

Melanoma Surgery Margins Recurrence Treatment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Breslow A, Macht SD. Optimal size of resection for thin cutaneous melanoma.Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;145:691–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balch CM, Murad TM, Soong S-J, Ingalls AL, Richards PC, Maddox W. Tumor thickness as a guide to surgical management of clinical stage I melanoma patients.Cancer 1979;43:883–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aitken DR, James AG, Carey LC. Local cutaneous recurrence after conservative excision of malignant melanoma.Arch Surg 1984;119:643–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cascinelli N, van der Esch EP, Breslow A, Morabito A, Bufalino R. W.H.O. Collaborating Centres for Evaluation of Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of Melanoma. Stage I melanoma of the skin: the problem of resection margins.Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1980;16:1079–85.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cosimi AB, Sober AJ, Mihm MC, Fitzpatrick TB. Conservative surgical management of superficially invasive cutaneous melanoma.Cancer 1984;53:1256–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elder DE, Guerry D, Heiberger RM, et al. Optimal resection margins for cutaneous malignant melanoma.Plast Reconstr Surg 1983;71:66–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Everall JD, Dowd PM. Diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of melanoma.Lancet 1977;2:286–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kelly KW, Sagebiel RW, Calderon W, Murillo L, Dakin RL, Blois MS. The frequency of local recurrence and microsatellites as a guide to reexcision margins for cutaneous malignant melanoma.Ann Surg 1984;200:759–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor BA, Hughes LE. A policy of selective excision for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma.Eur J Surg Oncol 1985;11:7–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veronesi U, Bajetta E, Cascinelli N, Clemente C, Rilke F. New trends in the treatment of malignant melanoma.Int Adv Surg Oncol 1978;1:113–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Day CL Jr, Mihm MC, Sober AJ, Fitzpatrick TB, Malt RA. Narrow margins for clinical stage I malignant melanoma.N Engl J Med 1982;306:479–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Adamus J, Balch C, Bandeira D, et al. Thin stage I primary cutaneous malignant melanoma: comparison of excision with margins of 1 or 3 cm.N Engl J Med 1988;318:1159–1162.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Veronesi U, Cascinelli N. Narrow excision (1-cm margin): a safe procedure for thin cutaneous melanoma.Arch Surg 1991;126:438–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balch C, Urist M, Karakousis C, Smith T, Temple W, et al. Efficacy of 2-cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas (1 to 4 mm).Ann Surg 1993;218:262–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beahrs O, Henson D, Hutter R, Kennedy B, eds.Manual for Staging of Cancer, 4th ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993:155–160.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Balch C, Soong S-J, Shaw H, Urist M, McCarthy W. An analysis of prognostic factors in 8500 patients with cutaneous melanoma. In: Balch C, Houghton A, Milton G, Sober A, Soong S-J, eds.Cutaneous Melanoma. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992:165–91.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parker S, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo P. Cancer statistics 1997.CA Cancer J Clin 1997;47:5–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ames F, Balch C, Reintgen D. Local recurrences and their management. In: Balch C, Houghton A, Milton G, Sober A, Soong S-J, eds.Cutaneous Melanoma. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1992:287–94.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Karakousis C, Balch C, Urist M, Ross M, Smith T, Bartolucci A. Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results in the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial.Ann Surg Oncol 1996;3:446–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lewis M, Hill J, Leopold J, Hughes L. Guidelines for management of malignant melanoma of the lower limb based on a study of long-term behaviour.Clin Oncol 1982;8:341–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McNeer G, Cantin J. Local failure in the treatment of melanoma. The Janeway Lecture.Am J Roentgenol 1967;99:791–5.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roses D, Harris M, Rigel D, Carrey Z, Friedman R, Kopf A. Local and in-transit metastases following definitive excision for primary cutaneous malignant melanoma.Ann Surg 1983;198:65–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    O'Rourke M, Altmann C. Melanoma recurrence after excision: is a wide margin justified?Ann Surg 1993;217:2–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reintgen D, Vollmer R, Tso C, Seigler H. Prognosis for recurrent stage I malignant melanoma.Arch Surg 1987;122:1338–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kirkwood J, Strawderman M, Ernstoff M, Smith T, Borden E, Blum R. Interferon alpha-2b adjuvant therapy of high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial EST 1684.J Clin Oncol 1996;14:7–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cole B, Gelber R, Kirkwood J, Goldhirsch A, Barylak E, Borden E. Quality of life adjusted survival analysis of interferon alpha-2b adjuvant treatment of high risk resected cutaneous melanoma: an ECOG study.J Clin Oncol 1996;14:2666–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Crowley N, Seigler H. The role of elective lymph node dissection in the management of patients with thick cutaneous melanoma.Cancer 1990;6:2522–7.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Balch C, Soong S, Bartolucci A, et al. Efficacy of an elective lymph node dissection of 1 to 4 mm thick melanomas for patients 60 years of age and younger.Ann Surg 1996;224:255–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith M. Heaton
    • 2
  • Jeffrey J. Sussman
    • 2
  • Jeffrey E. Gershenwald
    • 2
  • Jeffrey E. Lee
    • 2
  • Douglas S. Reintgen
    • 1
  • Paul F. Mansfield
    • 2
  • Merrick I. Ross
    • 2
  1. 1.H. Lee Moffitt Cancer CenterTampa
  2. 2.Dept. of Surgical OncologyThe University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterHouston

Personalised recommendations