Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 63–69 | Cite as

Public choice and rent control

  • Denton Marks
Articles

Conclusion

This application of the B/T model indicates that, in the short run, rent control may be a rational choice for consumers and that, as a related point, the likelihood of finding rent control in a jurisdiction increases with the size of the rental sector of the housing market. However, in the long run, the community that chooses rent control will have a smaller supply of housing than it would have had [Marks, forthcoming], and it will have effected a sub-optimal allocation of resources; moreover, aside from the initial capital loss to investors, the welfare loss from the inefficiency will be borne by consumers, particularly permanent residents of the jurisdiction. It is likely that support for control will weaken over time as the long-run effects begin to materialize. This weakening would probably occur more rapidly as the proportion of non-transient renters in a jurisdiction increases. However, a complete consideration of this issue remains as a topic for further research.

Keywords

International Economic Public Finance Public Choice Housing Market Rational Choice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Walter Block and Edgar Olsen (eds.),Rent Control: Myths and Realities, Vancouver, The Frazer Institute, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. James M. Buchanan and T. Nicolaus Tideman, “Gasoline Rationing and Market Pricing: Public Choice in Political Economy,”Atlantic Economic Journal, 2, November 1974.Google Scholar
  3. Frank de Leeuw, “The Demand for Housing: A Review of Cross-Sectional Evidence,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 53, February 1971.Google Scholar
  4. Frank de Leeuw and Nkanta F. Ekanem, “The Supply of Rental Housing,”American Economic Review, 61, December 1971.Google Scholar
  5. Joseph P. Fried, “Spread of Rent Controls Spurs New Controversy,”New York Times, March 7, 1976 (Section 1).Google Scholar
  6. Monica Lett,Rent Control: Concepts, Realities, and Mechanisms, New Brunswick, Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. Denton Marks, “The Effects of Partial-coverage Rent Control on the Price and Quantity of Rental Housing,”Journal of Urban Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  8. Edgar O. Olsen, “An Econometric Analysis of Rent Control,”Journal of Political Economy, 80, December 1972.Google Scholar
  9. A. Mitchell Polinsky, “The Demand for Housing: A Study in Specification and Grouping,”Econometrica, 45, March 1977.Google Scholar
  10. U.S. Bureau of the Census,Annual Housing Survey: 1977, Washington, D.C., U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. Edwin G. West and Michael McKee, “The Public Choice of Price Control and Rationing of Oil,”Southern Economic Journal, 48, July 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Atlantic Economic Society 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denton Marks
    • 1
  1. 1.University of British ColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations