Skip to main content
Log in

Marshallian and Schumpeterian theories of economic evolution: Gradualism versus punctualism

  • Articles
  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Kenneth J. Arrow and Gerard Debreu, “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy,”Econometrica, 22, July 1954, pp. 265–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francisco J. Ayala and G. Ledyard Stebbins, “Is a New Evolutionary Synthesis Necessary?,”Science, 213, August 1981, pp. 967–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gary S. Becker, “Irrational Behavior and Economic Theory,”Journal of Political Economy, 70, February 1962, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • __, “Altruism, Egoism, and Genetic Fitness: Economics and Sociobiology,”Journal of Economic Literature, 14, September 1976, pp. 817–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • __, “A Theory of Social Interactions,”Journal of Political Economy, 82, November 1971, pp. 1063–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mark Blaug,Economic Theory in Retrospect, 3rd ed., Cambridge, London: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenneth E. Boulding,Evolutionary Economics, Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles Darwin,On the Origin of Species, 1st ed., London: John Murray, 1859. (Facsimile of the first edition published by Harvard University Press, 1964.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Niles Eldredge and Stephen J. Gould, “Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism,”Models in Paleobiology, T.J.M. Schopf, ed., San Francisco, California: Freeman, Cooper and Co., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, “Methods in Economic Science,”Journal of Economic Issues, 13, June 1979, pp. 317–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen J. Gould, “Is a New and General Theory of Evolution Emerging?,”Paleobiology, 6, January 1980, pp. 119–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank H. Hahn, “Some Adjustment Problems,”Econometrica, 38, January 1970, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack Hirshleifer, “Economics from Biological Viewpoints,”Journal of Law and Economics, 20, April 1977, pp. 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • __, “The Expanding Domain of Economics,”American Economic Review, 75, December 1985, pp. 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre Simon de Laplace,A Philosophical Essay on Probability, New York: Wiley, 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey Leibenstein, “A Branch of Economics is Missing: Micro-Micro Theory,”Journal of Economic Literature, 17, June 1979, pp. 477–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wassily W. Leontief, “Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts,”American Economic Review, 61, March 1971, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.L. Levine, “Marshall's Principles and the Biological Viewpoint: A Reconsideration,”Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 3, September 1983, pp. 276–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred Marshall, “Mechanical and Biological Analogies in Economics,”Memorials of Alfred Marshall, A.C. Pigou, ed., London: Macmillan, 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  • __,Principles of Economics, 8th ed., London: Macmillan, 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  • __,Industry and Trade, London: Macmillan, 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst Mayr and W.B. Provine,The Evolutionary Synthesis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald N. McCloskey, “The Rhetoric of Economics,”Journal of Economic Literature, 21, June 1983, pp. 481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oskar Morgenstern, “Thirteen Critical Points in Contemporary Economic Theory: An Interpretation,”Journal of Economic Literature, 10, December 1972, pp. 1163–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence Moss, “Biological Theory and Technological Entrepreneurship in Marshall's Writings,”Eastern Economic Journal, 8, January 1982, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard R. Nelson and Sidney G. Winter,An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edith T. Penrose, “Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm,”American Economic Review, 42, December 1952, pp. 804–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl R. Popper,The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism, Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph A. Schumpeter,The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  • __, “The Analysis of Economic Change,”The Review of Economic Statistics, 17, May 1935, pp. 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • __,Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  • __,Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 3rd ed., New York: Harper, 1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert M. Solow, “On Theories of Unemployment,”American Economic Review, 20, March 1980, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven M. Stanley,The New Evolutionary Timetable, New York: Basic Books, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Tobin, “Inflation and Unemployment,”American Economic Review, 62, March 1972, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon Tullock, “Economics and Sociobiology: A Comment,”Journal of Economic Literature, 15, June 1977, pp. 502–06.

    Google Scholar 

  • John K. Whitaker, “Some Neglected Aspects of Alfred Marshall's Economic and Social Thought,”History of Political Economy, 9, Summer 1977, pp. 161–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is indebted to John Whitaker, Anthony Coates and Peter Thall for their useful comments and criticisms. Any inadequacies are, of course, the author's.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Awan, A.A. Marshallian and Schumpeterian theories of economic evolution: Gradualism versus punctualism. Atlantic Economic Journal 14, 37–49 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303213

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02303213

Keywords

Navigation