Abstract
An apparatus model with discrete momentum space suitable for the exact solution of the problem is considered. The special Hamiltonian of its interaction with the object system under consideration is chosen. In this simple case it is easy to illustrate how difficulties in constructing the dynamical interpretation of selective collapse can be overcome without any limiting procedure. For this purpose one can apply either averaging with respect to a nonquantum parameter or reduce the algebra of joint-system operators (i.e., pass from an algebraA of operators to a subalgebraA 0). The latter procedure implies averaging with respect to apparatus quantum variables not belonging toA 0.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Araki, H. (1980). A remark on Machida-Namiki theory of measurement,Progress of Theoretical Physics,64, 719–730.
Belavkin, V. P. (1994). Nondemolition principle of quantum measurement theory,Foundations of Physics,24, 685–714.
Belavkin, V. P. (1995). A dynamical theory of quantum measurement and spontaneous localization,Russian Journal of Mathematical Physics,3, 3–24.
Machida, S., and Namiki, H. (1980). Theory of measurement in quantum mechanics. Mechanism of reduction of wave packet I and II,Progress of Theoretical Physics,63, 1457–1473, 1833–1847.
Stratonovich, R. L. (1995). On the dynamical interpretation for the collapse of the state during quantum measurement, quantum communications and measurement, inProceedings of a Workshop on Quantum Aspects of Optical Communications and Measurement, 10–16 July, Nottingham, 1994, Plenum Press, New York.
Von Neumann, J. (1955).Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
On leave of absence from Physics Department, Moscow State University, 119899 Moscow, Russia.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stratonovich, R.L., Belavkin, V.P. Dynamical interpretation for the quantum-measurement projection postulate. Int J Theor Phys 35, 2215–2228 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302442
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302442