Summary
We have studied 454 oriented samples from seven loess outcrops in the Czech Republic for comparison and correlation of the magnetic properties with those of the loess profiles in China and Central Asia. Three sections at Sedlec (Prague), Zeměchy and Dolní Věstonice cover the time span of the last glacial-interglacial cycle. Loess from the middle Pleistocene period including pedocomplexes V and VI was studied at Sedlešovice (Znojmo) and Karlštejn. Loess of uncertain — possibly lower to middle Pleistocene age — was sampled at Sedlec near Mikulov. At Červený Kopec (Red Hill, Brno) we investigated the oldest loess near the Matuyama/Brunhes (M/B) boundary. The characteristic remanence (ChRM) determined after magnetic clearning is of normal polarity throughout all sections except at Červený Kopec. There, two polarity changes from reversed to normal were found within two sections initially thought to represent two successive stratigraphic intervals. However, the marked similarities between lithological, susceptibility, declination and inclination profiles lead us to suggest that the two polarity changes are in fact one and the same. The two sections are therefore laterally equivalent and both have recorded the M/B field reversal. The susceptibility variations were used to mutually correlate the Czech sections and to construct a composite profile across the present day loess outcrops in the Czech Republic. They also serve as a paleoclimate proxy which can be compared and correlated with the paleoclimatic records observed in the Chinese and Central Asian loess. The origin of the low field susceptibility variations was studied by measuring the frequency dependence of susceptibility which revealed that the enhancement within the pedocomplexes is controlled by the amount of fine-grained ferromagnetic minerals present.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bucha V., 1973: Correlation between field variations and precession of the earth in the Quaternary.Nature (Physical Science) 244, 137, 108–109.
Bucha V., Horáček J., Kočí A. and Kukla J., 1969: Paläomagnetische Messungen in Lössen. In: J. Demek and J. Kukla (eds.),Periglazialzone, Löss und Paläolithikum der Tschechoslowakei, Tschechoslow. Akad. Wissensch., Geogr. Inst., Brno, 123–131 (in German).
Büdel J., 1951: Die Klimazonen des Eiszeitalters.Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 1, 16–26 (in German).
Forster T., Evans M.E. and Heller F., 1994: The frequency dependence of low field susceptibility in loess sediments.Geophys. J. Intern. 118, 636–642.
Forster T. and Heller F., 1994: Paleomagnetism of loess deposits from the Tajik depression (Central Asia).Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 128, 501–512.
Fridrich J., 1978:Stredopaleolitické osídlení Čech. Kandidatska disertace (PhD Thesis, in Czech).
Havlíček P., Smolíková L., Kovanda J. and Břízová E., 1994: Loess complex near Sedlec (Southern Moravia).Sbor. Geol. Věd 21, 5–18.
Heller F., 1977: Paleomagnetism of Upper Jurassic limestones from Southern Germany.J. Geophys. 42, 475–488.
Heller F. and Liu T.S., 1984: Magnetism of Chinese loess deposits.Geophys. J.R. astr. Soc. 77, 125–141.
Heller F. and Liu T.S., 1986: Palaeoclimatic and sedimentary history from magnetic susceptibility of loess in China.Geophys. Res. Lett. 13, 1169–1172.
Heller F., Shen C.D., Beer J., Liu X.M., Liu T.S., Bronger A., Suter M. and Bonani G., 1993: Quantitative estimates and palaeoclimatic implications of pedogenic ferromagnetic mineral formation in Chinese loess.Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 114, 385–390.
Hus J.J. and Han J., 1992: The contribution of loess magnetism in China to the retrieval of past global changes — some problems.Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 70, 154–168.
Klíma B., Kukla J., Ložek V. and DeVries H., 1962: Stratigraphie des Pleistozäns und Alter des Paläolithischen Rastplatzes in der Ziegelei von Dolní Věstonice (Unter-Wisternitz).Anthropozoikum 11, 93–145 (in German).
Kočí A., 1973: Correlation between field variations and precession of the earth in the Quaternary.Nature (Physical Science) 244, 137, 108–109.
Kočí A., 1990: Geomagnetic field at the time of reversals.Veröff. Zentralinstitut für Physik der Erde Potsdam 62, 87–92.
Kukla G.J., 1975: Loess stratigraphy of Central Europe. In: K.W. Butzer and G.L. Isaac (eds.),After the Australopithecines, Mouton Publishers, The Hague, 99–188.
Kukla J., 1961: Stratigrafické posice českého starého paleolitu (Stratigraphische Position des tschechoslowakischen Altpaläolothikums).Památky Archeol. 52, 18–30 (in Czech).
Kukla G.J. and Kočí A., 1972: End of the last interglacial in the loess record.Quat. Res. 2, 374–383.
Liu X.M., Liu T.S., Xu T.C., Liu C. and Cheng M.Y., 1988: The primary study on magneto-stratigraphy of a loess profile in Xifeng area, Gansu province.Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 92, 345–348.
Ložek V., 1964: Quartärmollusken der Tschechoslowakei.Rozpravy UUG 31.
Ložek V., 1969: Paläontologische Charakteristik der Löss-Serien, In: J. Demek and J. Kukla (eds.),Periglazialzone, Löss und Paläolithikum der Tschechoslowakei, Tschechoslow. Akad. Wissensch., Geogr. Inst., Brno, 43–60 (in German).
Maher B.A., Zhou L.P., and Thompson R., 1994: Reconstruction of palaeoprecipitation values for the Chinese loess plateau from proxy magnetic data. In: B.M. Funnell and R.L.F. Kay (eds.),Palaeoclimate of the last glacial/interglacial cycle, Spec. Publ. NERC Earth Sci. Direct. 94/2, 33–36.
Musson F.M. and Wintle A.G., 1994: Luminescence dating of the loess profile at Dolni Vestonice, Czech Republic.Quat. Geochr. (Quat. Sc. Rev.) 13, 411–416.
Prošek F. and Lošek V., 1954: Stratigrafické otázky československého paleolitu.Památky Archeologické 45, 35–74 (in Czech).
Smolíková L., 1967: Zur Mikromorphologie der jungpleistozänen Böden von Sedlec bei Praha.Časopis pro mineralogii a geologii 12, 277–286 J. Demek and J. Kukla (eds.),Periglazialzone, Löss und Paläolithikum der Tschechoslowakei, Tschechoslow. Akad. Wissensch., Geogr. Inst., Brno, 123–131 (in German).
Smolíková L., 1968: Polygenese der fossilen Lössböden der Tschechoslowakei im Lichte mikromorphologischer Untersuchungen.Geoderma 1, 315–324 (in German).
Smolíková L., 1972: Gesetzmässigkeiten der Bodenentwicklung im Quartär.Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 22, 156–177 (in German).
Smolíková L., 1982: Zur Genese der mittelpleistozänen Böden von Červený Kopec bei Brno (Briznn).Věstník UUG 57/3, 169–178 (in German).
Smolíková L. and Fridrich J., 1984: Das Holstein Interglazial auf dem Fundplatz Karlštejn im böhmischen Karst: paläopedologische Entwicklung und Stellung der paläolithischen Steinindustrie.Archeologické rozhledy 36, 3–19 (in German).
Smolíková L. and Zeman A., 1979: Fossilböden im Profil von Sedlešovice und ihre Beziehung zu den Flussablagerungen.Věstník UUG 54/4, 215–224 (in German).
Vogel J.C. and Zagwijn W.H., 1967: Groningen radiocarbon dates VI.Radiocarbon 9, 63–106.
Zeman A., 1979: Červený Kopec Hill. In: V. Sibrava (ed.),IGCP, 6th sess. proj. 24, Guide to excursions, Geol. Surv. Czechoslovakia, Prague, 41–45.
Zeman A., 1992: New data on the Quaternary at Červený Kopec Hill in Brno.Scripta Geology 22, 123–127.
Zöller L., Oches E.A. and Mc Coy, W.D., 1994: Towards a revised chronostratigraphy of loess in Austria with respect to key sections in the Czech Republic and in Hungary.Quat. Geochr. (Quat. Sc. Rev.) 13, 465–472.
Žebera K., 1949: K současnému výzkumu kvartéru v oblasti Českého masivu (A propos de l'exploration actuelle des terrains quaternaires dans le domaine du Massiv Bohemien).Sborník Státního geologického ústavu ČSR 16, 731–781 (in Czech).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forster, T., Heller, F., Evans, M.E. et al. Loess in the Czech Republic: Magnetic properties and paleoclimate. Stud Geophys Geod 40, 243–261 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300741
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300741