Abstract
The development of integrated learning systems (ILSs) holds great promise for enhancing the instructional process and for improving student learning. This article describes an application of an ILS that takes into account learning theory research, principles of instructional design, and other factors related to human learning. The application presented utilizes IBM's “Advanced Technology Classroom” to verify the efficacy of integrated learning systems from both a student-user perspective and the perspective of instructors in a university setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angelo, T.A. (April, 1993). A “teachers dozen”: Fourteen general research-based principles for improving higher learning in our classrooms,AAHE Bulletin, 3–7.
Arnheim, R. (1969).Visual thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bailey, G. D. (1992). Wanted: A roadmap for understanding integrated learning systems.Educational Technology, 32(9), 3–5.
Cuban, L. (1986).Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1970. New York: Teachers College Press.
DeLoughry, T.J. (April, 1993). Two researchers say “technophobia” may afflict millions of students.Chronicle of Higher Education, A25–26.
Estes, W.K. (1959). The statistical approach to learning theory. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of science. Vol.II, 380–491, New York: McGraw Hill.
Eysenck, H.J. (1976).The measurement of personality. Baltimore, Maryland: University Park Press.
Ginther, D.W., Fullwood, H., & Price, C. (1992). Assisting teachers with rapidly changing integrated learning systems technology. In D. Carey, R. Carey, D.A. Willis, & J. Willis (Eds.),Technology and teacher education annual: 1992 (pp. 224–227), Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Guthrie, E.R. (1935).The psychology of learning. New York: Harper.
Horowitz, H. (1988).Student response systems: Interactivity in a classroom environment. Paper presented at the Sixth Conference of Interactive Instructional Delivery, Society of Applied Learning.
Hull, C.D. (1943).Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Kearsley, G. (1993). Educational technology: Does it work?Ed-Tech Review, Spring/Summer, 34–36.
Kinnaman, D.E. (1993). Technology and situated cognition.Technology and Learning, 14(1), 86.
Lewis, L. & Altbach, P. (1992). The new civil rights law and doctoral education.Academe, May/June, 12–14.
Maddux, C.D., & Willis, J.W. (1992). Integrated learning systems and their alternatives: Problems and cautions.Educational Technology, 32(9), 51–57.
Saettler, P. (1990).The evolution of American educational technology. Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Skinner, B.F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching.Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.
Thorndike, E.L. (1931).Human learning. New York: Appleton-Century.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
She has also been the Research Director for the IBM Advanced Technology Classroom at the university.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fischer, M.J. Integrated learning systems: An application linking technology with human factors and pedagogical principles. ETR&D 44, 65–72 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300426
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300426