Abstract
This paper reports on a case study which was undertaken to study issues fundamental to a computer-assisted, multicultural education. During the study, a group of Asian American middle-school students corresponded with culturally dissimilar students using telecommunications. The data reported reflect the Asian American students' experience. Results concerning three themes of the research are discussed: computer knowledge, learning processes, and communication patterns. Findings indicate that students of different ethnic backgrounds may have different attitudes about and knowledge of computers, cross-cultural communication patterns, and learning processes when working with computers. These differences should be taken into account when planning a computer-assisted, multicultural curriculum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., & Tarule, J.M. (1986).Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.
Bowers, C.A. (1988).The cultural dimensions of computers: Understanding the non-neutrality of technology. New York: Teachers College Press.
Canada, K., & Brusca, F. (1991). The technological gender gap: Evidence and recommendations for educators and computer-based instruction designers.Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(2), 43–51.
Claxton, C.S. (1990). Learning styles, minority students, and effective education.Journal of Developmental Education, 14, 6–8, 35.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994).Research methods in education (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Dao, Y. (1993).Hmong at the turning point. Minneapolis: Worldbridge. (Ed. by L. L. Blake)
DeVillar, R.A., & Faltis, C.J. (1991).Computers and cultural diversity: Restructuring for school success. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Diem, R.A. (1986). Computers in a school environment: Preliminary report of the social consequences.Theory and Research in Social Education, 14(2), 163–170.
Ehman, L.E., Glenn, A.D., Johnson, V., & White, C.S. (1992). Using computer databases in student problem solving: A study of eight social studies teachers' classrooms.Theory and Research in Social Education, 20(2), 179–206.
Escueta, E., & O'Brien, E. (1995). Asian Americans in higher education: Trends and issues. In D.T. Nakanishi & T.Y. Nishida (Eds.),The Asian American educational experience: A source book for teachers and students (pp. 259–272). (Reprinted fromResearch Briefs, 1991, 2(4), 1–11)
Freedman, K. (1989). Microcomputers and the dynamics of image making and social life in three art classrooms.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 21(3), 290–298.
Hsia, J., & Hirano-Nakanishi, M. (1995). The demographics of diversity: Asian Americans and higher education. In D.T. Nakanishi & T.Y. Nishida (Eds.),The Asian American educational experience: A source book for teachers and students (pp. 249–258). (Reprinted fromChange, November/December 1989, 20–27)
Ima, K., & Rumbaut, R. (1995). Southeast Asian refugees in American schools: Fluent English-proficient and limited-English-proficient students. In D.T. Nakanishi & T.Y. Nishida (Eds.),The Asian American educational experience: A source book for teachers and students (pp. 180–197). (Reprinted fromTopics in Language, 1989,9(3), 54–75)
Johnson, R.T., Johnson, D.W., & Stanne, M.B. (1986). Comparison of computer-assisted cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning.American Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 382–392.
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1989). Kids and computers: A positive vision of the future.Harvard Educational Review, 59(1), 73–86.
Muffoletto R., & Knupfer, N.N. (Eds.). (1993).Computers and education: Social, political, and historical perspectives. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Pang, V.O. (1995). Asian American children: A diverse population. In D.T. Nakanishi & T.Y. Nishida (Eds.),The Asian American educational experience: A source book for teachers and students (pp. 167–179). (Reprinted fromThe Educational Forum, 1990,55, 49–65)
Rysavy, S.D.M., & Sales, G.C. (1991). Cooperative learning in computer-based instruction.Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(2), 70–80.
Sanders, J.S., & Stone, A. (1986).The neuter computer: Computers for girls and boys. New York: Neil-Schuman.
Sayers, D. (1994). Bilingual team-teaching partnerships over long distances: A technology-mediated context for intragroup language attitude change. In R.A. DeVillar, C.J. Faltis, & J.P. Cummins (Eds.),Cultural diversity in schools: From rhetoric to practice (pp. 299–232). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Shashaani, L. (1994). Socioeconomic status, parents' sex role stereotypes, and the gender gap in computing.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(4), 433–451.
Siann, G., Macleod, H., Glissov, P., & Durndell, A. (1990). The effect of computer use on gender differences in attitudes to computers.Computers and Education, 14, 183–191.
Streibel, M.J. (1993). Instructional design and human practice: What can we learn from Grundy's interpretation of Habermas' theory of technical and practical human interest? In R. Muffoletto, & N.N. Knupfer (Eds.),Computers and education: Social, political, and historical perspectives (pp. 141–162). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
Vang, L., & Lewis, J. (1990).Grandmother's path, grandfather's way (2nd ed.). Rancho Cordova, CA: n.p.
Vasquez, J.A. (1991). Cognitive style and academic achievement. In J. Lynch, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.),Cultural diversity and the schools: Consensus and controversy. London: Falconer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors wish to thank Andy Xiong for his invaluable assistance on this project. We would also like to thank the three teachers for their contributions to the research. This research was supported by a grant from the Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, College of Education, University of Minnesota.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Freedman, K., Liu, M. The importance of computer experience, learning processes, and communication patterns in multicultural networking. ETR&D 44, 43–59 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300325
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300325