Skip to main content
Log in

Animation as feedback in a computer-based simulation: Representation matters

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore how users interact and learn during a computer-based simulation given graphical and textual forms of feedback. In two experiments, university students interacted with a simple simulation that modeled the relationship between acceleration and velocity. Subjects interacted with the computer simulation using a discovery-based approach: no formal instruction on the science concepts was presented. Subjects had control over the acceleration of a simple screen object—a ball—in a game-like context. Three simulation conditions were studied, each differing on how feedback of the ball's speed, direction, and position was represented: graphical feedback, textual feedback, and graphical plus textual feedback. Results showed that subjects learned more tacit knowledge when provided with animated graphical feedback than with textual feedback, although gains in explicit understanding of these science principles did not depend on the way the feedback was represented. Patterns of interactivity and frustration are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessi, S.M., & Trollip, S.R. (1991).Computer-based instruction: Methods and development. (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P.A., Schallert, D.L., & Hare, V.C. (1991). Coming to terms: how researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge.Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A.A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics.Cognition and Instruction, 10(2 & 3), 105–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchastel, P. (1990–1991). Instructional strategies for simulation-based learning.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 19(3), 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1985).The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G.V., & Hopkins, K.D. (1984).Statistical methods in education and psychology. (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorrell, J. (1992). Outcomes of using computer simulations.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24(3), 359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joolingen, W.R. (1991). Supporting hypothesis generation by learners exploring an interactive computer simulation.Instructional Science, 20(5–6), 389–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, S. (1986). Theoretical issues concerning superiority of pictures over words and sentences in memory.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 783–792.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulhavy, R.W., & Wager, W. (1993). Feedback in programmed instruction: Historical context and implications for practice. In J.V. Dempsey & G.C. Sales (Eds.),Interactive instruction and feedback, (pp. 3–20). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. (1983).Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E., & Anderson, R.B. (1992a). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E., & Anderson, R.B. (1992b). The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 444–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E., & Sims, V.K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 389–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J.L. (1979).Fundamentals of experimental design. (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1988).The psychology of everyday things. New York: BasicBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1993).Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1990).Mental representations: A dual coding approach. (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A., & Csapo, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding?Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A.S. (1993).Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A.S., & Lewis, S. (1977). Implicit learning: An analysis of the form and structure of a body of tacit knowledge.Cognition, 5, 333–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigeluth, C., & Schwartz, E. (1989). An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P. (1990). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P. (1991). Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P., Boyce, M., & Assad, C. (1990). The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17(2), 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P., & Kini, A. (1991). Theoretical foundations of instructional applications of computer-generated animated visuals.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18(3), 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L.P., Smith, M., Al-Ghafry, S., Strickland, W., Chu, G., & Spahi, F. (in press). The role of meaning in interpreting graphical and textual feedback during a computer-based simulation.Computers and Education.

  • Roschelle, J. (1991, April).MicroAnalysis of qualitative physics: Opening the black box: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago (ERIC Document ED 338 490).

  • Roschelle, J., & Greeno, J.G. (1987).Mental models in expert physics reasoning. Washington, DC: Office of Naval Research (ERIC Document ED 285 736).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: The analytic and systemic approaches to educational research.Educational Researcher, 20(6), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1987). Skill may not be enough: The role of mindfulness in learning and transfer.International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 623–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman, B. (1987).Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennyson, R.D., Thurlow, R., & Breuer, K. (1987). Problem-oriented simulations to develop and improve higher-order thinking strategies.Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towne, D.M. (1995).Learning and instruction in simulation environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towne, D.M., Jong, T., & Spada, H. (Eds.). (1993).Simulation-based experiential learning. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B.Y. (1993). ThinkerTools: Causal models, conceptual change, and science education.Cognition and Instruction, 10(1), 1–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Reiber says, “I thank Mack Smith and Faris Spahi for their help with various parts of this research.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rieber, L.P. Animation as feedback in a computer-based simulation: Representation matters. ETR&D 44, 5–22 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300323

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300323

Keywords

Navigation