Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of the probability of labor force participation of the AFDC population-at-risk

  • Articles
  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In summary, the functional form makes quite a difference. An investigator should be quite wary of making generalizations based on any single specification or estimation technique. However, the above results have shown in striking fashion the superiority of MLE of the sigmoid specifications over the OLS estimation of the linear probability specification. Although the logistic or urban specification require iterative solution, this is no barrier on a modern digital computer, with appropriate special algorithms. A further advantage of the MLE is the asymptotic normality of the estimates of ϑ i which permits large sample interval estimation, and the iteration method of scoring employed yields directly an estimate of the standard deviation of each normally distributed ϑ i . Also standard tests of significance are now applicable.

Perhaps most importantly, the sigmoid specifications are consistent with a probability interpretation since the estimates lie inside the unit interval, and the sigmoid shape is consistent with the assumed unimodal distribution of the participation decision.

In conclusion, results reported in previous investigations of the probability of labor force participation or labor force participation rate which have relied on the least squares estimation of a linear probability specification are likely to be unreliable as to he magnitude of the response attributed to changes in explanatory variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. J. Aigner, “An Appropriate Econometric Framework for Estimating a Labor Supply Function from the SEO File,”International Economic Review, 15, No. 1, 1974, pp. 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  2. _____, “MSE Dominance of Least Squares with Errors-of-Observation,”Journal of Econometrics, 2, 1974, pp. 365–72.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Takeshi Amemiya and Michael Boskin, “Regression Analysis when the Dependent Variable is Truncated Lognormal, with an Application to the Determinants of the Duration of Welfare Dependency,”International Economic Review, 15, No. 2, 1974, pp. 485–96.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. D. Ashton, “The Logit Transformation,”Griffin's Statistical Monographs and Courses, No. 32, Alan Stuart, Ed., Griffin, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Berkson, “Application of the Logistic Function to Bio-Assay,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 39, 1944, pp. 357–65.

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. G. Bowen and T. A. Finegan,The Economics of Labor Force Participation, Princeton University Press, 1969.

  7. Gerald Brown, “Nonlinear Statistical Estimation with Numerical Maximum Likelihood,”Western Management Science Institute (UCLA) Technical Report 222, 1974.

  8. Glen G. Cain,Married Women in the Labor Force, University of Chicago Press, 1966.

  9. M. S. Cohen, S. A. Rea, Jr., and R. I. Lerman,A Micro Model of Labor Supply, BLS Staff Paper 4, U.S. Department of Labor, 1970.

  10. Morley Gunderson, “Retention of Trainees, A Study with Dichotomous Dependent Variables,”Journal of Econometrics, 2, 1974, pp. 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. J. Hausman, “The Impact of Welfare on the Work Effort of AFDC Mothers,”The President's Commission on Income Maintenance Programs-Technical Studies, 1970, pp. 83–100.

  12. M. G. Kendall and A. Stuart,The Advanced Theory of Statistics, 2, 3rd ed., Halner Publishing Company, 1973.

  13. R. G. McGillivary, “Estimating the Linear Probability Function,”Econometrica, September 1970, pp. 775–76.

  14. Marc Nerlove and S. James Press,Univariate and Multivariate Log-linear and Logistic Models, Rand-1306EDA/NIH, December 1973.

  15. E. J. Solberg and F. Langille, “The Wage Rate, Potential Work Incentives, and Benefit Payment Reduction in the AFDC Program,”The Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, Summer 1974, pp. 85–100.

  16. Henri Theil,Economics and Information Theory, Rand McNally and Co., 1967.

  17. M. R. Wickens, “A Note on the Use of Proxy Variables,”Econometrica, July 1972, pp. 759–61.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solberg, E., Brown, G. & Rutemiller, H. Estimation of the probability of labor force participation of the AFDC population-at-risk. Atlantic Economic Journal 5, 22–31 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300307

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300307

Keywords

Navigation