Summary
In summary, the functional form makes quite a difference. An investigator should be quite wary of making generalizations based on any single specification or estimation technique. However, the above results have shown in striking fashion the superiority of MLE of the sigmoid specifications over the OLS estimation of the linear probability specification. Although the logistic or urban specification require iterative solution, this is no barrier on a modern digital computer, with appropriate special algorithms. A further advantage of the MLE is the asymptotic normality of the estimates of ϑ i which permits large sample interval estimation, and the iteration method of scoring employed yields directly an estimate of the standard deviation of each normally distributed ϑ i . Also standard tests of significance are now applicable.
Perhaps most importantly, the sigmoid specifications are consistent with a probability interpretation since the estimates lie inside the unit interval, and the sigmoid shape is consistent with the assumed unimodal distribution of the participation decision.
In conclusion, results reported in previous investigations of the probability of labor force participation or labor force participation rate which have relied on the least squares estimation of a linear probability specification are likely to be unreliable as to he magnitude of the response attributed to changes in explanatory variables.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. J. Aigner, “An Appropriate Econometric Framework for Estimating a Labor Supply Function from the SEO File,”International Economic Review, 15, No. 1, 1974, pp. 59–68.
_____, “MSE Dominance of Least Squares with Errors-of-Observation,”Journal of Econometrics, 2, 1974, pp. 365–72.
Takeshi Amemiya and Michael Boskin, “Regression Analysis when the Dependent Variable is Truncated Lognormal, with an Application to the Determinants of the Duration of Welfare Dependency,”International Economic Review, 15, No. 2, 1974, pp. 485–96.
W. D. Ashton, “The Logit Transformation,”Griffin's Statistical Monographs and Courses, No. 32, Alan Stuart, Ed., Griffin, London, 1972.
J. Berkson, “Application of the Logistic Function to Bio-Assay,”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 39, 1944, pp. 357–65.
W. G. Bowen and T. A. Finegan,The Economics of Labor Force Participation, Princeton University Press, 1969.
Gerald Brown, “Nonlinear Statistical Estimation with Numerical Maximum Likelihood,”Western Management Science Institute (UCLA) Technical Report 222, 1974.
Glen G. Cain,Married Women in the Labor Force, University of Chicago Press, 1966.
M. S. Cohen, S. A. Rea, Jr., and R. I. Lerman,A Micro Model of Labor Supply, BLS Staff Paper 4, U.S. Department of Labor, 1970.
Morley Gunderson, “Retention of Trainees, A Study with Dichotomous Dependent Variables,”Journal of Econometrics, 2, 1974, pp. 79–93.
L. J. Hausman, “The Impact of Welfare on the Work Effort of AFDC Mothers,”The President's Commission on Income Maintenance Programs-Technical Studies, 1970, pp. 83–100.
M. G. Kendall and A. Stuart,The Advanced Theory of Statistics, 2, 3rd ed., Halner Publishing Company, 1973.
R. G. McGillivary, “Estimating the Linear Probability Function,”Econometrica, September 1970, pp. 775–76.
Marc Nerlove and S. James Press,Univariate and Multivariate Log-linear and Logistic Models, Rand-1306EDA/NIH, December 1973.
E. J. Solberg and F. Langille, “The Wage Rate, Potential Work Incentives, and Benefit Payment Reduction in the AFDC Program,”The Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, Summer 1974, pp. 85–100.
Henri Theil,Economics and Information Theory, Rand McNally and Co., 1967.
M. R. Wickens, “A Note on the Use of Proxy Variables,”Econometrica, July 1972, pp. 759–61.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solberg, E., Brown, G. & Rutemiller, H. Estimation of the probability of labor force participation of the AFDC population-at-risk. Atlantic Economic Journal 5, 22–31 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300307
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300307