Despite the pervasive phenomenon of scale economies, the majority of firms have always been small firms. The emergence of small firms as a means of economic development on both sides of the Atlantic has been one of the major new topics of economic policy since the 1980s. This has drawn renewed attention to the question: How are small firms able to exist? The theories of strategic niches and dynamic complementarity imply that small firms seek out markets where they are able to avoid competition with their larger counterparts. This paper tests the validity of these theories by examining the extent to which small-firm profitability is set by large-firm profitability. Considerable evidence shows that the price-cost margins of small firms do not tend to follow those of large firms. This supports the theory that small firms pursue a strategy of producing in distinct product niches.
KeywordsEconomic Development Economic Policy International Economic Public Finance Small Firm
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Acs, Z. J.; Audretsch, D. B.Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990.Google Scholar
- Audretsch, D. B.Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
- Audretsch, D. B.; Yamawaki, H., eds.Structure, Conduct and Performance: The Work of Leonard Weiss, New York, NY: New York University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
- Caves, R. E.; Porter, M. E. “From Entry Barriers to Mobility Barriers,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91, 1977, pp. 241–61.Google Scholar
- Caves, R. E.; Pugel, T.Intraindustry Differences in Conduct and Performance: Viable Strategies in U.S. Manufacturing Industries, Salomon Brothers Center for Study of Financial Institutions, New York University, Monograph Series in Financial Economics, No. 1980-2, 1980.Google Scholar
- Domowitz, I.; Hubbard, R. G.; Petersen, B. C. “Business Cycles and the Relationship Between Concentration and Price-Cost Margins,”Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 1986, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
- Hsiao, C.Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
- Newman, H. “Strategic Groups and the Structure-Performance Relationship,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 1978, pp. 417–27.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E. “The Structure Within Industries and Companies' Performance,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 61, 1979, pp. 214–27.Google Scholar
- Pugel, T. A. “Foreign Trade and U.S. Market Performance,”Journal of Industrial Economics, 29, 1980, pp. 119–29.Google Scholar
- Rothwell, R.; Zegveld, W.Innovation and the Small and Medium Sized Firm, London, United Kingdom: Francis Pinter, 1985.Google Scholar
- Scherer, F. M.; Ross, D.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3rd ed., Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin, 1990.Google Scholar
- Schmalensee, R. “Do Markets Differ Much?,”American Economic Review, 75, 1985, pp. 341–51.Google Scholar