Skip to main content
Log in

Cognitive efficiency: Toward a revised theory of media

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Within and beyond the field of educational technology, Richard Clark's writings are widely believed to have shown that any number of media are equally capable of delivering any instruction, so that media choices are about cost and efficiency but not about cognition and learning (Clark, 1983; 1994b). However, if it is accepted that one type of efficiency is cognitive efficiency, then it follows that media choices are often about cognition and learning and can profit from an understanding of cognitive processes. Media and learning can then be reconnected in limited ways that do not compromise any of Clark's main points, and doing this will bring media work into line with current research into the role of surface information codes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu Rabia, S. and Siegel, L.S. Different orthographies, different context effects: The effects of Arabic sentence context in skilled and poor readers.Reading Psychology, 16(1), 1–19.

  • Adams, M.J. (1990).Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.R. (1995).Learning and memory. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmuth, M. (1982).The roots of phonics. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappelle, C. (1996). CALL—English as a second language.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 139–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M.T.H., Glaser, R., and Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1975).Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1993). Symbolic invention: The missing (computational) link?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 753–754.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review ofEducational Research, 53(4), 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1984). A reply to Petkovich and Tennyson.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 32, 238–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1985). Confounding in educational computing research.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(2), 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1994a). Media will never influence learning.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. (1994b). Media and method.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(3), 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. and Salomon, G. (1986). Media in teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.),Third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 464–478). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R.E. and Snow, R.E. (1975). Alternative designs for instructional technology research.Audio-Visual Communications Review, 23(4), 373–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, K.B. (1996). CALL—Non-English L2 instruction.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 158–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulmas, F. (1989).The writing systems of the world. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. (1991). An instructional designer's view of constructivism.Educational Technology, May, 41–44.

  • Donald, M. (1993). Precis of Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 737–791.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel, P. (1991). The effectiveness research on computer-assisted instruction and computer-assisted language learning. In P. Dunkel (Ed.),Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice. New York: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1990). The reemergence of learning theory within instructional research.American Psychologist, 45(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleitman, L.R. and Rozin, P. (1973). Teaching reading by use of a syllabary.Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 447–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J.R. and Simon, H.A. (1977). Psychological differences in problem isomorphs. In N.J. Castellan, D.B. Pisoni, and G.R. Potts (Eds.),Cognitive theory. Hillsdale, NJ Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, J. and Chappelle, C. (1988). Using CALL effectively: What do we need to know about students?System, 16(2), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (1988). Cognitive processes in second-language reading: Transfer of L1 reading skills and strategies.Second Language Research, 4(2), 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R.B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. (1982).Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.E. (1972). Nonalphabetic writing systems: Some observations. In J.F. Kavanagh and I.G. Mattingly (Eds.),Language by eye and by ear: The relationship between speech and reading (pp. 81–102). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1962).The Gutenberg galaxy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus-or-minus two: Some limitations on our capacity for information processing.Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1993).Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagels, H.R. (1988).The dreams of reason: The computer and the rise of the sciences of complexity. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1985).Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petkovich, M.D. and Tennyson, R.D. (1984). Clark's Learning from Media: A critique.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 32(4), 233–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994).The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York: William Morrow and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, M., and Meara, P. (1988). How Arabs read Roman letters.Reading in a Foreign Language, 4(2), 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romizowski, A. (1988).The selection and use of instructional media: For improved classroom teaching and for interactive, individualized instruction. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. Lloyd (Eds.),Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce, and W.F. Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: The analytic and systemic approaches to educational research.Educational Research, 20(6), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, T.A. (1991). Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In K.A. Ericsson and J. Smith,Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasanuma, S. (1975). Kana and Kanji processing in Japanese aphasics.Brain and Language, 369–383.

  • Scribner, S. and Cole, M. (1981).The psychology of literacy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrock, S. (1994). The media effects question: Read the fine print, but don't lose sight of the big picture.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng, O.J.L. and Hung, D.L. (1981). Linguistic determinism: A written language perspective. In O.J.L. Tzeng and H. Singer (Eds.),Perception of print: Reading research in experimental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmer, E.J. (1994). Media and learning: Are there two kinds of truth?Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(1), 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whorf, B.L.. (1956).Language, thought, and reality. Edited by J.B. Carroll. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. and Norman, D.A. (1994). Representations of distributed cognitive tasks.Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cobb, T. Cognitive efficiency: Toward a revised theory of media. ETR&D 45, 21–35 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299681

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299681

Keywords

Navigation