Abstract
This study was designed to identify factors that best predicted the amount and perceived benefits of network use. A 70-item electronic mail survey measured five categories of variables: personal attributes, environmental characteristics, perceived media characteristics, usage, and outcomes. It was returned by 66% of a random sample of 300 network users. Respondents were active network users with high levels of teaching tenure, schooling, and computer experience, and convenient access to equipment needed to use the Internet. Outcomes reported for network use mainly centered around professional development activities, whereas personal and instructional outcomes were less frequently reported. Multiple regression equations predicted 28% of amount of use, 46% of variety of uses, 45% of professional benefits, 16% of personal gratifications, and 25% of instructional outcomes. Socially oriented factors appeared repeatedly in these equations. Social integration with a community of users entered all but one of the equations, social presence contributed to the prediction of each type of outcome, and number of contacts regularly reached via the network was associated with both amount and variety of use. These findings suggested that network facilitators should implement strategies to increase interactions among potential and current network users and to enhance perceptions of the systems' social presence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, S. E. (1992). Factors associated with usage of a public telecomputing system.Dissertation Abstracts International, 54, 1769. (University Microfilms No. ADG9324908)
Anderson, S. E., & Gansneder, B. (1995). Using electronic mail surveys and computer-monitored data for studying computer-mediated communication systems.Social Science Computer Review, 13(1), 33–46.
Anderson, S. E., & Harris, J. B. (1995). Educators' use of a statewide telecomputing network: A descriptive analysis.International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 407–440.
Babbie, E. R. (1990).Survey research methods (2nd Edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Becker, H. J. (1994). How exemplary computer-using teachers differ from other teachers: Implications for realizing the potential of computers in schools.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(3), 291–321.
Blumler, J. G. (1979). The role of theory in uses and gratifications studies.Communication Research, 6, 9–36.
Boulware, Z. M. (1994). Identifying factors in the diffusion and implementation of the Florida Information Resource Network.Dissertation Abstracts International, 55, 1533. (University Microfilms No. AAC9424089)
Broholm, J. R., & Aust, R. (1994). Teachers and electronic mail: Networking on the network.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2(2), 167–182.
Burt, R. S. (1973). The differential impact of social integration on participation in the diffusion of innovations.Social Science Research, 2, 125–144.
Culnan, M. J. (1984). The dimensions of accessibility to online information: Implications for implementing office information systems.ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2(2), 141–150.
Danin, S. T. (1993).Mid-Atlantic Consortium for Mathematics and Science Education. Technology use pilot test: Evaluation Report. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375 812)
Dillman, D. A. (1978).Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Doty, R. (1995). Teacher's Aid.Internet World, 6(3), 75–77.
Dutton, W., Kovaric, P., & Steinfield, C. (1985). Computing in the home: A research paradigm.Computers in the Social Sciences, 1, 5–11.
Educorp Consultants Corporation. (1993).Networks now: The 1993 survey of how states use telecommunication networks in education. Roanoke, VA: Author.
Frazier, G. G., & Frazier, D. (1993).TENET after one year. Naples, FL: WEB Associates.
Gallo, M. A., & Horton, P. B. (1994). Assessing the effect on high school teachers of direct and unrestricted access to the Internet: A case study of an East Central Florida high school.Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(4), 17–39.
Garramone, G. M., Harris, A. C., & Anderson, R. (1986). Use of political computer bulletin boards.Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 30(3), 325–339.
Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences.International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147–166.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987).Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Hamilton, J., & Thompson, A. (1992). The adoption and diffusion of an electronic network for education.Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 347 991)
Harris, J. (1995). Organizing and facilitating telecollaborative projects.The Computing Teacher, 22(5), 66–69.
Harris, J. B., & Grandgenett, N. (1996). Correlates among teachers' anxieties, demographics, and telecomputing activity.Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(3), 300–317.
Heaviside, S., Farris, E., Malitz, G., & Carpenter, J. (1995).Advanced telecommunications in U.S. public schools, K-12 (E. D. TABS Report No. NCES 95-731). Washington: DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Heaviside, S., Farris, E., Malitz, G., & Carpenter, J. (1996).Advanced telecommunications in U.S. public elementary and secondary schools, 1995 (E.D. TABS Report No. NCES 96-854). Washington: DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Hiltz, S. R. (1988). Productivity enhancement from computer-mediated communication: A systems contingency approach.Communications of the ACM, 31, 1438–1454.
Hiltz, S. R., & Johnson, K. (1989). Measuring acceptance of computer-mediated communication systems.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(6), 386–397.
Honey, M., & Henríquez, A. (1993).Telecommunications and K-12 educators: Findings from a national survey. New York: Center for Technology in Education, Bank Street College of Education.
Honey, M., & McMillan, K. (1993).Case studies of K-12 educators use of the Internet: Exploring the relationship between metaphor and practice. New York: Educational Development Center, Center for Children and Technology. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 372 726)
Judson Webb, L. (1994). TENET—Texas connection to the world.Information Searcher, 6(3), 24–26.
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler and E. Katz (Eds.),The Uses of Mass Communications (pp. 19–32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Marshall, J. G. (1987).The adoption and implementation of online information technology by health professionals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto.
Mathies, B. K., & Nelson, B. (1995). A network named Desire.Tech Trends, 40(1), 20–23.
McQuarrie, E. F. (1989). The impact of a discontinuous innovation: Outcomes experienced by owners of home computers.Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 227–240.
Palmgreen, P., Wenner, L. A., & Rayburn, J. D. (1980). Relations between gratifications sought and received: A study of television news.Communication Research, 7, 161–192.
Parker, C. (1989).Technology and telecommunications in public education. Texas Senate Bill 650, Section 14.042, 71st Legislature.
Rafaeli, S. (1986). The electronic bulletin board: A computer-driven mass medium.Computers and the Social Sciences, 2, 123–136.
Rogers, E. M. (1986).Communication technology: The new media in society. New York: Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (1995).Diffusion of innovations (4th Edition). New York: Free Press.
Sheingold K, & Hadley, M. (1990).Accomplished teachers: Integrating computers into classroom practice. New York: Center for Technology in Education, Bank Street College of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 322 900)
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976).The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: Wiley.
Steinfield, C. W. (1986). Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses. InCommunication Yearbook 9 (pp. 777–804). White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry Publications.
Stuhlmann, J. M. (1994).Circumstances and experiences that lead to incorporating telecommunications into teaching practices. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 374 812)
Sunal, C. S., Scheffler, A. J., & Sunal, D. (1993). Communication technology in the classroom—exploring implications for teacher education: A case study.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 1(3), 275–289.
Swift, C. R. (1989). Audience activity in computer-mediated communication.Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 1841. (University Microfilms No. AAC8925201)
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings.IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-29, 28–45.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995).Teachers and technology: Making the connection (OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Williams, F., Rice, R. E., & Rogers, E. M. (1988).Research methods and the new media. New York: Free Press.
Worthen, B. R., Borg, W. R., & White, K. R. (1993).Measurement and evaluation in the schools. New York: Longman.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
A copy of the survey can be obtained by contacting Susan Anderson by e-mail (sander@tenet.edu) or telephone (817-921-7943). The authors gratefully acknowledge the support and assistance for this project provided by Connie Stout and Gene Titus of the Texas Education Network and Stephani Wise at Texas Christian University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, S., Harris, J. Factors associated with amount of use and benefits obtained by users of a statewide educational telecomputing network. ETR&D 45, 19–50 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299611
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299611