Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 170–185 | Cite as

Trade liberalization and productivity growth in Australian manufacturing industries

  • Renuka Mahadevan


Although there has been a revival of interest in the trade-growth nexus, the impact of trade liberalization on productivity gains remains empirical, given the ambiguity in the literature on this issue. This paper examines the case for Australia using annual data of eight two-digit manufacturing industries from 1968–69 to 1994–95. Unlike earlier studies, total factor productivity growth is first decomposed into technological progress and gains in technical efficiency, and the effect of trade liberalization is then investigated separately on TFP growth, as well as on each of the components of TFP growth. The empirical finding that trade liberalization has a positive and significant effect on technological progress, but no significant effect on gains in technical efficiency, adds yet another dimension to the evaluation of trade liberalization policies.


International Economic Public Finance Technical Efficiency Empirical Finding Productivity Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aigner, D. J.; Lovell, C. A. K.; Schmidt, P. J. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models,”Journal of Econometrics, 6, 1, 1977, pp. 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, S. E.; Cornwall, C. “Estimating Radial Measures of Productivity Growth: Frontier vs Non-Frontier Approaches,”Journal of Productivity Analysis, 10, 1998, pp. 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aw, B. Y.; Chang, S.; Roberts, M. “Productivity and Turnover in the Export Market: Evidence from Taiwan and South Korea,” Mimeo, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, A. B.; Jensen, J. B. “Exports, Jobs and ages in U.S. Manufacturing 1976–1987,”Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 1995, pp. 67–112.Google Scholar
  5. --. “Exporting and Productivity,” paper presented at the 1998 Summer Institute, NBER, Cambridge, Massachusettes, August, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. Chand, S. “Trade Liberalization and Productivity Growth: Time Series Evidence from Australian Manufacturing,”The Economic Record, 75, 228, 1999, pp. 28–36.Google Scholar
  7. --. “How Misaligned is the Australian Real Exchange Rate?,” paper presented at the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, C.; Geer, T.; Underhill, B. “The Changing of Australian Manufacturing,” staff information paper, Industry Commission, Australia, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. Condon, T.; Corbo, V.; De Melo, J. “Productivity Growth, External Shocks and Capital Inflow in Chile 1977–81: A General Equilibrium Analysis,”The Journal of Policy Modeling, 7, 3, 1985, pp. 329–406.Google Scholar
  10. Dixon, P. B.; MacDonald, D. “Labor Productivity in Australia” in Adams, P. D.; Dixon, P. B.; Parmenter, B. R. (eds)Sources and Effects of Productivity Growth, 1991 (Canberra: Economic Planning Advisory Council, Background Paper No. 29).Google Scholar
  11. Dollar, D. “Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–1985,”Economic Development and Cultural Change, 40, 3, 1992, pp. 523–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dowrick, S. “Openness and Growth,”Proceedings of Conference of Reserve Bank of Australia, Reserve Bank of Australia, 1994, pp. 10–41.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, S. “Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?”The Economic Journal, 108, 1998, pp. 383–98.Google Scholar
  14. Farrell, M.J. “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency,”Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, General, 120, 3, 1957, pp. 253–81.Google Scholar
  15. Freedman, C.; Stonecash, R. “A Survey of Manufacturing Industry Policy: From the Tariff Board to the Productivity Commission,”Economic Record, 73, 221, 1997, pp. 169–83.Google Scholar
  16. Gretton, P.; Fisher, B. “Productivity Growth and Australian Manufacturing Industry,” staff research paper, AGPS, Canberra, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. Griffiths, W. E. “Estimation of Actual Response Coefficients in the Hildredth-Houck Random Coefficient Model,”Journal of The American Statistical Association, 67, 1972, pp. 633–35.Google Scholar
  18. Grossman, G. M.; Helpman, E.Trade Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. Harrison, A. “Openness and Growth: Time Series, Cross-Country Analysis of Developing Countries,”Journal of Development Economics, 48, 1996, pp. 419–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvrylshyn, O. “Trade Policy and Productivity Gains in Developing Countries: A Survey of the Literature,”World Bank Research Observer, 5, 1, 1990, pp. 53–73.Google Scholar
  21. ——. “Liberalising Foreign Trade: Yugoslavia” in Papageorgiou, D.; Michaely, M.; Choksi, A. M., (eds.)Liberalising Foreign Trade Volume 3 The Experience of Israel and Yugoslavia, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
  22. Hildredth, C.; Houck, J. K, “Some Estimators for Linear Model with Random Coefficients,”Journal of The American Statistical Association, 63, 1968, pp. 764–68.Google Scholar
  23. Industry Commission “Australian Manufacturing Industry and International Trade Date 1968–69 to 1992–93:” Information paper, AGPS, Canberra, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. Jayanthakumaran, K. “Trade Reforms and Manufacturing Performance,” paper presented at the Pacific Rim Allied Economic Organizations Conference, Sydney, Australia, 1999.Google Scholar
  25. Kalirajan, K. P.; Shand, R.Economics in Disequilibrium: An Approach from the Frontier, Macmillan Indian Limited, 1994a.Google Scholar
  26. Kalirajan, K. P.; Obwona, M. “Frontier Production Function: A Stochastic Coefficients Approach,”Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56, 1994b, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
  27. Mayes, D.; Harris, C.; Lansbury, M.Inefficiency In Industry, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. Meeusen, W.; Van Den Broeck, J. “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error,”International Economic Review, 18, 2, 1977, pp. 435–44.Google Scholar
  29. Moran, C. “Aggregate Production Functions, Technical Efficiency, and Trade Orientation in Developing Countries,” World Bank working paper 1987-3, International Economic Analysis and Prospects Division, International Economics Department, Washington, DC, 1987.Google Scholar
  30. Narasimham, G. V. L.; Swamy, P. A. V. B.; Reed, R. C. “Productivity Analysis of U.S. Manufacturing Using a Stochastic-Coefficients Production Function,”Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 6, 3, 1988, pp. 339–49.Google Scholar
  31. Nishimizu, M.; Page, J. “Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress and Technical Efficiency Change: Yugoslavia 1965–78,”The Economic Journal, 92, 1982, pp. 920–36.Google Scholar
  32. --. “Trade Policy, Market Orientation and Productivity Change in Industry” in J. de Melo and A. Sapir (eds),Trade Theory and Economic Reforms: Essays in Honour of Bela Balassa, Blackwell Publishers, 1991.Google Scholar
  33. Ockowski, E.; Sharma, K. “Imperfect Competition, Returns to Scale and Productivity Growth in Australia Manufacturing: A Smooth Transition Approach to Trade Liberalisation,” Mimeo, 1999.Google Scholar
  34. Page, J. M. “Firm Size and Technical Efficiency: Application of Production Frontiers to Indian Survey Data,”Journal of Development Economics, 16, 1–2, 1984, pp. 129–52.Google Scholar
  35. Parham, D.; Makin, T. “Australia's Productivity Performance,” inProductivity Growth and Industrial Structure in the Pacific Region, Pacific Economic Outlook/Structure, Japan Committee for Pacific Economic Outlook and Pacific Economic Cooperation Council, 2000.Google Scholar
  36. Pitt, M.; Lee, Leung-Fei. “The Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry,”Journal of Development Economics, 7, 1, 1981, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar
  37. Renuka, M; Kalirajan, K. P. “On Measuring Total Factor Productivity Growth in Singapore's Manufacturing Industries,”Applied Economics Letters, 6, 1999, pp. 295–98.Google Scholar
  38. Rodriguez, F.; Rodrik, D. “Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic's Guide to the Cross-National Evidence,” Centre for Economic Policy Research working paper 2143, 1999.Google Scholar
  39. Rodrik, D. “The Limits of Trade Policy Reforms in Developing Countries,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 1, 1992a, pp. 87–105.Google Scholar
  40. --. “Closing the Productivity Gap: Does Trade Liberalisation Really Help?” in G. K.Helleiner (ed.)Trade Policy, Industrialisation and Development, Oxford University Press, 1992b.Google Scholar
  41. --. “Trade and Industrial Policy Reform” in J. Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan (eds)Handbook of Development Economics, III, North Holland, 1995.Google Scholar
  42. Sachs, J. D.; Warner, A. M., “Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration,”Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1995, pp. 1–95.Google Scholar
  43. Sheehan, M. “The Evolution of Technical Efficiency in the Northern Ireland Manufacturing Sector, 1973–1985,”Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 44, 1, 1997, pp. 59–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tybout, J. R. “Making Noisy Data Sing: Estimating Production Technologies in Developing Countries,”Journal of Econometrics, 53, 1990, pp. 25–44.Google Scholar
  45. ——. “Linking Trade and Productivity: New Research Directions,”World Bank Research Observer, 6, 1, 1992, pp. 234–42.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Renuka Mahadevan
    • 1
  1. 1.University of QueenslandAustralia

Personalised recommendations