Skip to main content
Log in

The general theory: Fabrication or revolution? David Laidler, 1999, pp. 377

  • Book Review Article
  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ackley, G.Macroeconomic Theory and Policy, New York: Macmillan, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besomi, D. “Sir Roy Harrod,” in Thomas Cate (ed),The Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics, Cheltenham, U.K: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. “Was There a Marginal Revolution,”History of Political Economy, 4, 2, Fall, 1972.

  • Cate, T. “Keynes and Probability,” in Thomas Cate (ed),An Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cate, T.; Johnson, L. E. “Economics of Keynes and of his Revolution, Key Elements of the,” in Thomas Cate (ed),An Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • __. “The Theory of Probability: A Key Element in Keynes' Revolution,”International Advances in Economic Research, November, 1998.

  • DeVroey, M. “The Transition From Classical to Neo-Classical Economics: A Scientific Revolution,”Journal of Economic Issues, IX, 3, September, 1975.

  • Domar, E. D. “Capital Expansion, Rate of Growth, and Employment,”Econometrica, 14, 2, April, 1946.

  • __. “Expansion and Employment,”American Economic Review, 37, 1, March, 1947.

  • __. “The Problem of Capital Accumulation,” American Economic Review, 38, 5, December, 1948.

  • __. “Economic Growth: An Econometric Approach,” American Economic Review, 42, 3, May, 1952.

  • Haber, L. J. “Alvin H. Hansen,” in Thomas Cate (ed),The Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics, Cheltenham, U.K: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. H.Full Recovery or Stagnation, New York: Macmillan, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  • __. “Progress and Declining Population,”American Economic Review, 29, 1, March, 1939.

  • Harrod, R. F.The Trade Cycle, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • __. “An Essay on Dynamic Theory,”Economic Journal, 49, 139, September, 1938.

  • __.Towards a Dynamic Economics, London: Macmillan, 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  • __. “Second Essay in Dynamic Theory,”Economic Journal, 70, 278, June, 1960.

  • Hartley, J. E. “Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution,”Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 4, December, 1999.

  • Hicks, J. R. “Mr. Keynes and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation,”Econometrica, 5, 2, April, 1937.

  • Hollander, J. H. “Adam Smith: 1776–1926,”Journal of Political Economy, April, 1927.

  • Johnson, L. E. “A Neo-Paradigmatic Model for Studying the Development of Economic Reasoning,”Atlantic Economic Journal, VIII, No. 4, December, 1980.

  • __. “Economic Paradigms: A Missing Dimension,”Journal of Economic Issues, XVII, No. 4, December, 1983.

  • __. “The Legacy of Ricardo: A Review Article,”Rivista Internazionale De Scienze Economiche E Commerciali (International Review of Economics and Business), Vol. XXXV, No. 8, August, 1988.

  • __. “Professor Arrow's Ricardo,”Journal of the History of Economic Thought,” Vol. 15, No. 3, Spring, 1993a.

  • __. “Professor Arrow and Mr. Ricardo's Geistesgeschichten,”Best Papers and Proceedings, Atlantic Economic Society, Vol. 3, No. 1, January, 1993b.

  • Johnson, L. E.; Cate, T. “The Analytical Preconditions for Keynes' Theory of Money,”International Advances in Economic Research, February, 2000.

  • __. “Keynes' Theory of Money and His Attack on the Classical Model,”International Advances in Economic Theory, Volume 7, Number 3, November, 2000.

  • Johnson, L. E.; Gramm, W. S.; Hoaas, D. J. “Marx's Law of Profit: The Current State of the Controversy,”Atlantic Economic Journal, Vol. XVII, No. 4, December, 1989.

  • __. “The Falling Rate of Profit Debate in Marx: Alternative Lines of Interpretation,”Marx and Modern Economic Analysis, Volume II, edited by Giovanni A. Caravale, London: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L. E.; Ley, R. E.Origins of Modern Economics: A Paradigmatic Approach, Lexington, MA: Simon & Schuster, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, R. F. “The Relation of Home Investment to Unemployment,”Economic Journal, 41, June, 1931.

  • Keynes, J. M.The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money, London: Macmillan, 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  • __.The Economic Consequences of the Peace, London: Macmillan, 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, L. R.The Keynesian Revolution, New York: Macmillan, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, D.The Golden Age of the Quantity Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • __.Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindert, P. H.Prices, Jobs, and Growth, Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, A. ‘Mr. Keynes’ “General Theory of Employment Interest and Money,”International Labour Review, 34, October, 1936.

  • Marshall, S. L. A.World War I, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston: 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. E. “A Simplified Model of Mr. Keynes' System,”Review of Economic Studies, 4, February, 1937.

  • Metzler, A. H. “Keynes' General Theory — A Different Perspective,”Journal of Economic Literature, 19, March, 1981.

  • ——.Keynes' Monetary Theory — A Different Interpretation, Cambridge: UK, Cambridge University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigou, A. C. “Mr. J. M. Keynes' General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money,”Economica, 3, May, 1936.

  • Reddaway, W. B. “The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money,”Economic Record, 12, June, 1936.

  • Samuelson, P. A. “Interactions between the Multiplier and the Principle of Acceleration,”Review of Economics and Statistics, 21, May, 1939a.

  • --. “A Synthesis of the Principle of Acceleration and the Multiplier,”Journal of Political Economy, 47, December, 1939b.

  • --. “Hansen as a Creative Economic Theorist,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 1, February, 1976.

  • Shackle, G. L. S.The Years of High Theory, Cambridge: UK, Cambridge University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky, R.John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 2, London: Macmillan, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R. M. “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, 3, June, 1956.

  • Stanfield, R. “Kuhnian Scientific Revolutions and the Keynesian Revolution,”Journal of Economic Issues, VIII, 1, March, 1974.

  • Togati, D. T. “Keynes as the Einstein of Economic Theory,”History of Political Economy, 33, 1, 2001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to thank the referees for their helpful suggestions. The authors alone are responsible for the contents of the paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, L.E., Cate, T. The general theory: Fabrication or revolution? David Laidler, 1999, pp. 377. Atlantic Economic Journal 30, 87–96 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299149

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299149

Keywords

Navigation