Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 26–33 | Cite as

A heckscher-ohlin-samuelson interpretation of the labor-environmental coalition in Seattle

  • Robert E. Kohn
Articles

Abstract

The coalition of North American labor unions and environmental organizations that joined in Seattle in 1999 is examined in the context of a Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson simulation in which a labor abundant developing country, with a comparative advantage in a globally polluting industry but a weak environmental policy, endeavors to export some of the output of that industry to a capital abundant industrialized country but is thwarted by a trade sanction that requires it to adopt the strong environmental policy of the industrialized country as a precondition for trade. Labor unions in the industrialized country and environmental organizations both gain when the developing country complies with the sanctions but lose out when the World Trade Organization overrules the sanctions as barriers to free trade.

Keywords

International Economic Industrialize Country Public Finance Environmental Policy Free Trade 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chambers, Paul E.; Kohn, Robert E. “Environmental Barriers to Trade: The Case of Endangered Sea Turtles,”Review of International Economics, 9, 1, February 2001, pp. 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Farley, Joshua, “Should Market Economists be Protesting the WTO Too?”Ecological Economics, 33, 2000, pp. 337–340.Google Scholar
  3. Fredriksson, Per G. “The Political Economy of Trade Liberalization and Environmental Policy,”Southern Economic Journal, 65, 1999, 513–525.Google Scholar
  4. Friedman, Thomas L.The Lexus and the Olive Tree, Anchor Books, New York, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Jaffe, Adam B.; Peterson, Steven R.; Portney, Paul R.; Stavins, Robert N. “Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?”Journal of Economic Literature, 33, March 1995, pp. 132–163.Google Scholar
  6. Kohn, Robert E. “Internalizing International Versus Domestic Damages of a Pure Global Pollutant: An Extension of Musgrave and Shibata,”Public Finance/ Finances Publiques, 52, 2, 1997, pp. 198–209.Google Scholar
  7. __. “Unilateral Transfer of Abatement Capital,”Resource and Energy Economics, 23, 2, April 2001, pp. 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee, James R. “Basic Attributes of Trade and Environment: What do the Numbers Tell Us?”Ecological Economics, 19, October 1996, pp. 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Leonard, H. Jeffrey.Pollution and the Struggle for the World Product, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
  10. Markusen, James R., “International Externalities and Optimal Tax Structures,”Journal of International Economics, 5, 1975, pp. 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Musgrave, Peggy B. “Pure Global Externalities: International Efficiency and Equity,” in Lans Bovenberg and Sijbren Cnossen, Eds.Public Economics and the Environment in an Imperfect World, Kluwer, Boston, 1995, pp. 237–259.Google Scholar
  12. Perroni, Carlo; Wigle, Randall M. “International Trade and Environmental Quality: How Important are the Linkages?”Canadian Journal of Economics, 27, August 1994, pp. 551–567.Google Scholar
  13. Prokosch, Mike. “Realizing Seattle's Potential,”The Progressive Populist, 6(22), December 15, 2000, p.10.Google Scholar
  14. Samuelson, Paul A. “International Factor-Price Equalisation Once Again,”The Economic Journal, 9, June 1949, 181–197.Google Scholar
  15. Sawyer, Jon. “Union Leader Calls Gephardt ‘Hypocrite’ for Supporting Kyoto,”St. Louis Post-Dispatch, 123, June 20, 2001, p. A5Google Scholar
  16. Shibata, Hirofumi. “Doubtful Merits of Equal-rate Pigovian Taxes and Tradeable Permits in Controlling Global Pollution,” in Robert Mendelsohn and Daigee Shaw, Eds.,The Economics of Pollution Control in the Asia Pacific, Elgar, Cheltenham, 1996.Google Scholar
  17. Stolper, Wolfgang F.; Samuelson, Paul A. “Protection and Real Wages,”Review of Economic Studies, 9, 1941, pp.58–73.Google Scholar
  18. Weinstein, Michael M. “Declaring Defeat in the Face of Victory: Greens and Globalization,”The New York Times, 150, 51731, April 22, 2001, p. 18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert E. Kohn
    • 1
  1. 1.Southern Illinois University at EdwardsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations