Skip to main content

Union status and merger activity in the U.S.

Abstract

Theories on merger activity and union membership suggest that conglomerate mergers should enhance the probability of managers employing nonunion workers, while nonconglomerate mergers should be associated with a greater probability of union membership. To test this hypothesis, a standard sample-selection derived union status equation is estimated which includes measures of three types of merger activity as explanatory variables. The findings suggest that being in an industry with substantial conglomerate mergers reduces the chance that a worker is a union member. All other types of mergers are positively associated with the probability of union membership. This pattern holds even after controlling for the possibility of merger endogeneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Belman, D. "Concentration, Unionism, and Labor Earnings: A Sample Selection Approach,"The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70, 1988, pp. 391–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.; Medoff, J. L. "The Impact of Firm Acquisitions on Labor, in Corporate Takeovers," In A. J. Auerbach eds., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, H. S. "The Determination of the Union Status of Workers,"Econometrica, 51. 1983, pp. 1417–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. G.Econometric Analysis, MacMillian Publishing Company, New York, NY, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerard, J. B. "The Role of Employment and Capital Expenditure in the Merger and Acquisition Process,"Mergers and Acquisitions, in M. Keenan and L. J. White eds., Lexington Books, Lexington, MA, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. "The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selections, and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models,"Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 1976, pp. 475–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, W. "Conglomerate Mergers and Collective Bargaining,"Industrial Relations, 15, 1976, pp. 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J.; Peoples, J. "Unions and the Pattern of Corporate Mergers: U.S. Evidence,"Labour Economics, 1, 1994, pp. 203–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, B. T.; Berger, M. C. "Union Membership Determination and Industry Characteristics,"Southern Economic Journal, 50, 1983, 665–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F.; Siegal, D. "The Effect of Takeovers on the Employment and Wages of Central-Office and Other Personnel,"National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper 2985.

  • Pratten, C. F.Economics of Scale in Manufacturing Industry, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, England, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, D. "The Effect of Changes in Firm Diversification on Union Wage Settlements for 15 Major U.S. Firms,"Southern Economic Journal, 55, 1989, pp. 896–907.

    Google Scholar 

  • __. "Are Strikes Less Effective in Conglomerate Firms?"Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1991 pp. 131–44.

  • Scherer, F. M.Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Rand McNally: Chicago, IL, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M.; Ravescraft, David.Mergers, Sell-Offs, and Economic Efficiency, The Brookings Institute: Washington D.C., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voos, P.; Michel, L. "The Union Rent Impact on Policies: Economics for Industry Price-Cost Margins,"Journal of Labor Economics, 4, 1986, pp. 105–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peoples, J. Union status and merger activity in the U.S.. Atlantic Economic Journal 23, 45–56 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298989

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298989

Keywords

  • Explanatory Variable
  • International Economic
  • Status Equation
  • Public Finance
  • Union Status