Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 140–149 | Cite as

Methods of ranking economics journals

  • Gaines H. Liner
  • Minesh Amin
Articles

Abstract

This paper reviews and critiques some popular methods of ranking economics journals, compares results of some methods, and suggests new uses of two old methods. International economics journals are ranked and used to provide a vehicle for the analyses. Journal citations over a five-year period provide the data input for the analysis. This study illustrates the significance of the method used in how journals are ranked. The Bradley-Terry model is used to estimate the odds ratios one journal will cite another. The model is also discussed as a possible tool for finding the boundary between fields and field journals.

Keywords

Data Input International Economic Public Finance Popular Method Economics Journal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agristi, Alan.Categorical Data Analysis, New York, NY: Wiley, 1990.Google Scholar
  2. Bush, Winston C.; Hamelman, Paul W.; Staaf, Robert J. “A Quality Index for Economics Journals,”The Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 1, February 1974, pp. 123–25.Google Scholar
  3. Burton, M. P.; Phimister, E. “Core Journals: A Reappraisal of the Diamond List,”Economic Journal, 105, March 1995, pp. 361–73.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, John B. “Problems in Using the Social Sciences Citation Index to Rank Economics Journals,”American Economist, Fall 1998, pp. 59–65.Google Scholar
  5. Diamond, Arthur M. “The Core Journals in Economics,”Current Contents, 21, 1, 1989, pp. 2–9.Google Scholar
  6. Enomoto, Carl E.; Ghosh, Soumendra N. “A Stratified Approach to the Ranking of Economics Journals,”Studies in Economic Analysis, 14, 2, Spring 1993, pp. 74–93.Google Scholar
  7. Gordon, Randall A.; Vicori, Pamela J. “Eminence in Social Psychology: A Comparison of Textbook Citation, Social Sciences Citation Index, and Research Productivity Rankings,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 1, February 1992, pp. 26–38.Google Scholar
  8. Hawkins, Robert G.; Ritter, Lawrence S.; Walter, Ingo. “What Economists Think of Their Journals,”The Journal of Political Economy, 81, 4, July–August 1973, pp. 1017–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Laband, David; Piette, Michael. “The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970–1990,”Journal of Economic Literature, 32, June 1994, pp. 640–66.Google Scholar
  10. Larson, James S.; Kershaw, Robert. “Rating Journals in Health Care Administration by the Textbook Citation Method,”Medical Care, 31, 11, November 1993, pp. 1057–61.Google Scholar
  11. Liebowitz, S. J.; Palmer, J. P. “Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals,”Journal of Economic Literature, 32, March 1984, pp. 77–88.Google Scholar
  12. Liner, Gaines H. “Core Journals in Economics,”Economic Inquiry, 40, 1, January 2002, pp. 138–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stigler, George J.; Stigler, Stephen M.; Friedland, Claire. “The Journals of Economics,”Journal of Political Economy, 103, 2, April 1995, pp. 331–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stigler, Stephen, M. “Citation Patterns in the Journals of Statistics and Probability,”Statistical Science, 9, 1, February 1994, pp. 94–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gaines H. Liner
    • 1
  • Minesh Amin
    • 1
  1. 1.University of North Carolina at CharlotteU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations