Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 100–112 | Cite as

Newspaper quality, pulitzer prizes, and newspaper circulation

  • Brian Logan
  • Daniel Sutter

Abstract

Many journalists and journalism scholars contend that the profit motive of commercial media companies conflicts with the supply of high quality journalism. However, media companies should supply high quality news if quality yields sufficiently greater revenues. Quality journalism may not increase audience either because of a lemons problem or because consumers do not value the product dimensions that journalists do. The authors test whether news quality matters in a cross-section of U.S. newspapers. Newspapers winning Pulitzer Prizes in recent years have significantly higher circulation, even when controlling for the economic, demographic, and media characteristics of their markets.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof, George A. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 3, August 1970, pp. 488–500.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, William L. “The Washington Post and Jimmy's World,”American Journal of Economics and Sociology, forthcoming, 2002.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, William L.; Sutter, Daniel. “Market Forces, the Quality of News, and the 2000 Presidential Election,” unpublished manuscript, University of Oklahoma, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Baumol, William J. “Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth,”American Economic Review, 57, 1967, pp. 415–26.Google Scholar
  5. Broadcasting and Cable Yearbook 1998, New Providence, NJ: R. R. Bowker, 1998.Google Scholar
  6. Chalk, Andrew. “Market Forces and Aircraft Safety: The Case of the DC-10,”Economic Inquiry, 24, 1, January 1986, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar
  7. Cranberg, Gilbert; Bezanson, Randall; Soloski, John.Taking Stock: Journalis and the Publicly Traded Newspaper Company, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  8. Croteau, David; Hoynes, William.The Business of Media: Corporate Media and the Public Interest, Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. Darby, Michael R.; Karni, Edi. “Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud,”Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 1, April 1973, pp. 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Downs, Anthony.An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York, NY: Harper and Row, 1957.Google Scholar
  11. Fallows, James.Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy, New York, NY: Pantheon Books, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. Goff, Brian; Tollison, Robert D. “Why is the Media so Liberal?”Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 8, 1, Jan.–April 1990, pp. 13–21.Google Scholar
  13. Grier, Kevin B.; McGarrity, Joseph P. “The Effect of Macroeconomic Fluctuations on the Electoral Fortunes of House Incumbents,”Journal of Law and Economics, 41, 1, April 1998, pp. 143–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horner, Johannes. “Reputation and Competition,”American Economic Review, 92, 3, June 2002, pp. 644–63.Google Scholar
  15. Jarrell, Gregg; Peltzman, Sam. “The Impact of Product Recalls on the Wealth of Sellers,”Journal of Political Economy, 93, 3, June 1985, pp. 512–36.Google Scholar
  16. Klein, Benjamin; Leffler, Keith B. “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,”Journal of Political Economy, 89, 4, August 1981, pp. 615–41.Google Scholar
  17. Kovach, Bill; Rosenstiel, Tom.The Elements of Journalism, New York, NY: Crown Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
  18. Lacy, Steven; Simon, Todd F.The Economics and Regulation of United States Newspapers, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1993.Google Scholar
  19. Laventhol, David. “Profit Pressures: A Question of Margins,”Columbia Journalism Review, May/June 2001, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
  20. Martinelli, Cesar. “Would Rational Voters Acquire Costly Information?” Unpublished manuscript, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. McChesney, Fred S. “Sensationalism, Newspaper Profits, and the Marginal Value of Watergate,”Economic Inquiry, 25, 1, January 1987, pp. 135–44.Google Scholar
  22. McChesney, Robert W.Rich Media, Poor Democracy, Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  23. Mitchell, Mark L.; Maloney, Michael T. “Crisis in the Cockpit? The Role of Market Forces in Promoting Air Travel Safety,”Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 1989, pp. 329–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nelson, Philip. “Information and Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Political Economy, 78, 1970, pp. 311–29.Google Scholar
  25. Pritchard, Peter.The Making of McPaper: The Inside Story of USA Today, Kansas City, MO: Andrews, McMeel, and Parker, 1987.Google Scholar
  26. Roberts, Gene; Kunkel, Thomas; Layton, Charles.Leaving Readers Behind: The Age of Corporate Newspapering, Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  27. Rowse, Arthur E.Drive-By Journalism: The Assault on Your Need to Know, Monroe, ME: Common Courage Publishers, 2000.Google Scholar
  28. Scammon, Richard M.; McGillivray, Alice V.; Cook, Rhodes.America Votes 22, Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, 1998.Google Scholar
  29. SRDS Circulation '98. Des Plaines, IL: SRDS, 1998.Google Scholar
  30. Sutter, Daniel. “The ‘Liberal’ Media: Bias or Customer Preferences?”Applied Economics, forthcoming, 2002.Google Scholar
  31. Thompson, R. S. “Circulationversus Advertiser Appeal in the Newspaper Industry: An Empirical Investigation,”Journal of Industrial Economics, 37, 3, 1989, pp. 259–71.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Logan
    • 1
  • Daniel Sutter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OklahomaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations