Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 75–88 | Cite as

The European Union: Eastern enlargement and taxation

  • M. Peter van der Hoek


The European Union has not defined its limits in geographical terms. Each enlargement has led and will lead to a decrease of the European Union's per capita GDP. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the transition countries went through a long and deep recession. However, they have reached a stage of positive growth and their tax levels are approaching the lower limit of the range of tax/GDP ratios in European Union countries. Differences exist in tax capacity and tax effort. In some countries, greater efforts are possible to improve tax revenues. Further examination of the timing of tax administration reform may shed light on tax effort in transition countries. The paper also suggests the existence of a negative relationship between tax effort and corruption. (JEL P27, H20)


Lower Limit Negative Relationship International Economic Public Finance Great Effort 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bahl, R. W. “A Regression Approach to Tax Effort and Tax Ratio Analysis,”IMF Staff Papers, 18, 3, November 1971, pp. 570–612.Google Scholar
  2. Chelliah, R. J. “Trends in Taxation in Developing Countries,”IMF Staff Papers, 18, 2, July 1971, pp. 254–331.Google Scholar
  3. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Annual Transition Report, London: EBRD, various years.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission,Agenda 2000 — Volume II — Communication: The Effects on the Union's Policies of Enlargement to the Applicant Countries of Central and Eastern Europe (Impact Study), Brussels, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission.Continuing Enlargement; Strategy Paper and Report of the European Commission on the Progress Towards Accession by Bulgaria, Romania and Turkey, [], Brussels, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. Mertens, J. B. “Measuring Tax Effort in Central and Eastern Europe,”Public Finance and Management, 3, 4, 2003, pp. 530–63.Google Scholar
  7. Musgrave, R. “Tax Reform in Developing Countries,” inPublic Finance in a Democratic Society. Volume 3. The Foundations of Taxation and Expenditure, Cheltenham and Northampton: Elgar, 2000, pp. 467–90.Google Scholar
  8. Schoors, K.; Gobbin, N. “Enlargement,” Chapter 25 in M. Peter van der Hoek,Handbook of Public Administration and Policy in the European Union, New York: Dekker, Inc., 2004 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  9. Steves, F.; Rousso, A.Anti-corruption Programmes in Post-communist Transition Countries and Changes in the Business Environment, 1999–2002, EBRD Working paper, London: December 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Stotsky, J. G.; Wolde Mariam, A. “Tax Effort in Sub-Saharan Africa,” IMF Working Paper No. 97/107, Washington, DC: IMF, 1997.Google Scholar
  11. Tait, A. A.; Gratz, W. L. M.; Eichengreen, B. J. “International Comparisons of Taxation for Selected Developing Countries, 1972–76,”IMF Staff Papers, 26, 1, March 1979, pp. 123–56.Google Scholar
  12. Tanzi, V. “Comparing International Tax ‘Burdens’: A Suggested Method,”Journal of Political Economy, 76, 5, September–October 1968, pp. 1078–84.Google Scholar
  13. ——. “Structural Factors and Tax Revenue in Developing Countries: A Decade of Evidence,” in Ian Goldin; L. Alan Winters, eds.,Open Economies: Structural Adjustment and Agriculture, Cambridge, New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 267–85.Google Scholar
  14. The World Bank,Transition: The First Ten Years; Analysis and Lessons for Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. Transparency International,Corruption Perceptions Index, Berlin: Transparency International, various years.Google Scholar
  16. van der Hoek, M. P. “From Nation to State: A Difficult Process,”Public Administration and Management: An Interactive Journal, 3, 4, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. ——. “Europe: The 1990s and Beyond,”Journal of European Economy, 2, 1, March 2003a, pp. 43–56.Google Scholar
  18. ——. “Tax Harmonization and Competition in the European Union,”eJournal of Tax Research, 1, 1, 2003b, pp. 19–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Peter van der Hoek
    • 2
    • 1
  1. 1.Eramus UniversityNetherlands
  2. 2.Academy of Economic StudiesRomania

Personalised recommendations