Atlantic Economic Journal

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 389–402 | Cite as

Jurisdictional competition for quality standards: Competition of laxity?

  • Thomas Apolte


Regulatory competition arises where governments mutually accept quality standards in a common market. It has been claimed that regulatory competition will be subject to market failure and lead to competition of laxity in a sense that only the lowest possible quality standards survive regulatory competition. In this paper, it is shown that these results do not need to follow. First, if not a large number of small jurisdictions but a small number of large jurisdictions compete for quality standards, then the resulting quality standards will end up above the minimum level, albeit still below an efficient level. If no subsidies are allowed in order to compensate for losses by producers working under strict quality standards, quality standards will generally converge to the level of the jurisdiction with the lowest quality preferences, but not below this level. A second argument against a competition of laxity result is that quality standards of governments may be better judged by consumers than product qualities by producers. As far as this is the case, regulatory competition may even be superior to a harmonized quality standard.


Product Quality International Economic Public Finance Quality Standard Minimum Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akerlof, G. A. “The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and The Market Mechanism,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 1970, pp. 488–500.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, F. “Reputation and Product Quality,”Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 1984, pp. 311–27.Google Scholar
  3. Apolte, T.Die Ökonomische Konstitution eines Föderalen Systems, J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), Tübingen, 1999.Google Scholar
  4. Caudill, S. B.; Holbombe, R. G. “Specification Search and Levels of Significance in Econometric Models,”Eastern Economic Journal, 25, 1999, pp. 289–300.Google Scholar
  5. Congleton, R. D. “Rational Ignorance, Rational Voter Expectations, and Public Policy: A Discrete Informational Foundation for Fiscal Illusion,”Public Choice, 107, 2001, pp. 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darby, R. R.; Karni, E. “Free Competition and The Optimal Amount of Fraud,”Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 1973, pp. 67–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flatters, F.; Henderson, V.; Mieszkowski, P. “Public Goods, Efficiency, and Regional Fiscal Equalization,”Journal of Public Economics, 3, 1974, pp. 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fremling, G. M.; Lott, J. R. “The Bias Towards Zero in Aggregate Perceptions. An Explanation Based on Rationally Calculating Individuals,”Economic Inquiry, 34, 1996, pp. 276–95.Google Scholar
  9. Kihlstrom, R; Riordan, M. “Advertising As a Signal,”Journal of Political Economy, 92, 1984, pp. 427–50.Google Scholar
  10. Knorr, A. “Do Blacklists Enhance Aviation Safety?,”Intereconomics, 32, 1997, pp. 14–22.Google Scholar
  11. Kreps, D. M.; Wilson, R. “Reputation and Imperfect Information,”Journal of Economic Theory, 27, 1982, pp. 253–79.Google Scholar
  12. Leland, H. E. “Quacks, Lemons, and Licensing: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards,”Journal of Political Economy, 87, 1979, pp. 1328–46.Google Scholar
  13. Nelson, P. “Information and Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Political Economy, 78, 1970, pp. 311–29.Google Scholar
  14. Shapiro, C. “Premiums for High Quality Products As Returns to Reputations,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, 1983, pp. 659–79.Google Scholar
  15. Siebert, H.; Koop, M. “Institutional Competition Versus Centralization: Quo Vadis Europe?,”Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 9, 1993, pp. 15–30.Google Scholar
  16. Sinn, H. W. “The Selection Principle and Market Failure in Systems Competition,”Journal of Public Economics, 66, 1997, pp. 247–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Spence, M. “Informational Aspects of Market Structure: An Introduction,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 1976, pp. 591–7.Google Scholar
  18. Sun, J. M.; Pelkmans, J. “Regulatory Competition in The Single Market,” in:Journal of Common Market Studies, 33, 1995, pp. 67–89.Google Scholar
  19. Ungern-Sternberg, T. R.; Weizsäcker, C. C. “Marktstruktur und Marktverhalten bei Qualitätsunsicherheit,”Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften, 101, 1981, pp. 609–21.Google Scholar
  20. Wilson, C. “The Nature of Equilibrium in Markets with Adverse Selection,”Bell Journal of Economics, 11, 1980, pp. 108–30.Google Scholar
  21. Wolinsky, A. “Prices As Signals of Product Quality,”Review of Economic Studies, 50, 1983, pp. 647–58.Google Scholar
  22. Woolcock, S. “The Single European Market. Centralization or Competition Among National Rules?,”Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. Zodrow, G. R.; Mieszkowski, P. “Pigou, Tiebout, Property Taxation, and The Underprovision of Local Public Goods,”Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 1986, pp. S356–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Atlantic Economic Society 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Apolte
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations