Skip to main content
Log in

Nonprice rivalry among health insurers and coverage of new technologies

  • Articles
  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops a multiple-period theoretical model of health maintenance organization (HMO) coverage of medical procedures as a function of HMO competition and a market's predisposition toward managed care. Previous empirical results regarding one laser procedure were not predicted by a single-period model. The new model predicts that more favorable predisposition toward managed care is positively associated with coverage of procedures for which coverage is discretionary. The empirical analysis in this paper focuses on 13 additional laser procedures. The new empirical findings are different from the previous findings and are more consistent with the hypotheses generated by the new theoretical model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker, Laurence C.; Wheeler Susan K. “HMOs and the Availability and Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging,”Health Affairs, 17, September 1998, pp. 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernew, Michael; Fendrick, A. Mark; Hirth, Richard A. “Managed Care and Medical Technology: Implications for Cost Growth,”Health Affairs, 16, March 1997, pp. 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frick, Kevin D.; Powe, Neil R. “HMO Coverage of Cosmetic Procedures: Response to Market Competition,”International Advances in Economics Research, 4, 4, 1998.

  • Fudenberg, Drew; Tirole, Jean.Game Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Group Health Association of America.1993 National Directory of HMOs, Washington, DC: GHAA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Care Financing Administration. <http://www.hcfa.gov/medicare/mpscpt1.htm>, 2000.

  • Hellerstein, Judith K. “Public Funds, Private Funds, and Medical Innovation: How Managed Care Affects Public Funds for Clinical Research,”American Economic Review, 88, May 1998, pp. 112–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • InterStudy.InterStudy Competitive Edge, 1993.

  • McLaughlin, Catherine G. “Market Response to HMOs: Price Competition or Rivalry?,”Inquiry, 25, Summer 1988, pp. 207–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wholey, Douglas; Feldman, Roger; Christianson, Jon B. “The Effect of Market Structure on HMO Premiums,”Journal of Health Economics, 14, May 1995, pp. 81–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Stephen J. “Ambulatory Health Care Services,” in Stephen J. Williams; Paul R. Torrens, eds.,Introduction to Health Services, New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1989, pp. 124–59.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The data were obtained under a grant from the Office of Technology Assessment (HMO Laser Procedure Coverage) and the University of Michigan Rackham Pre-doctoral Fellowship (InterStudy). The authors would like to thank an anonymous reviewer and participants at a session sponsored by the International Atlantic Economic Society at the 1998 Allied Social Science Association meetings, Chicago, IL, for their helpful comments. Any remaining errors belong to the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frick, K.D., Powe, N.R. Nonprice rivalry among health insurers and coverage of new technologies. Atlantic Economic Journal 28, 450–462 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298397

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298397

Keywords

Navigation