Environment analysis: A neglected stage of instructional design

  • Martin Tessmer


Environment analysis is a recognized but undeveloped step in the instructional design process. To date, no systematic process or criteria exists for analyzing instructional environments. This paper defines the concept of environment analysis and lists the factors, questions, and tools that can be used to apply the process to instructional design projects.


Design Process Systematic Process Educational Technology Instructional Design Design Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrews, D. H. & Goodson, L. A. (1980). A comparative analysis of models of instructional design.Journal of Instructional Development, 3(4), 2–16.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, R. W. (1982).Human performance engineering: A guide for systems designers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Banathy, B. (1987). Instructional systems design. In R. Gagné (Ed.),Instructional Technology: Foundations (pp. 85–113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Baskerville, R. (1981). In search of a design for the study of school climate. In P. Sleeman & D. Rockwell (Eds.),Designing Learning Environments (pp. 12–22). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Bisesi, M. & Felder, D. (1986). Interactive television. In P. Breivik (Ed.).Managing programs for learning outside the classroom (pp. 32–35). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Brockman, J. (1986).Writing better computer user documentation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, R., & Salomon, G. (1986). Media in teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 464–476). New York: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
  8. Dalton, D. (1987). Some advantages and disadvantages of narrow-cast television: One instructor's experience.Educational Technology, 27(1), 42–44.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, I. K. (1973).Competency based learning: Technology, management and design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Dick, W., & Reiser, R. (1989).Planning effective instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Durzo, J. J., Diamond, R. M., & Doughty, P. L (1979). An analysis of research needs in instructional development.Journal of Instructional Development, 2(4), 4–11.Google Scholar
  12. Einseidel, A. (1984).Improving project management. Boston, MA: International Human Resources Corporation.Google Scholar
  13. Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. (1988).Principles of Instructional Design (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  14. Green, E., & Miller, G. (1978). Putting together anId team.Journal of Instructional Development, 2(1), 29–33.Google Scholar
  15. Havelock, R. G. (1973).The change agent's guide to innovation in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Hativa, N. (1988). Computer-based drill and practice in arithmetic: Widening the gap between high and low-achieving students.American Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 366–399.Google Scholar
  17. Jacobs, R., Boyd, D., & High, W. (1985). Computerized testing: The hidden figures approach.Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1(2), 173–177.Google Scholar
  18. Kerr, S. (1981). How teachers design their materials: Implications for instructional design.Instructional Science, 10, 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Knirk, F. G. (1979).Designing productive learning environments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Knirk, F., & Gustafson, K. (1986).IT: A systematic approach to education. New York: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  21. Knupfer, N. (1988). Teacher's beliefs about instructional computing: Implications for instructional design.Journal of Instructional Development, 11(4), 29–38.Google Scholar
  22. Lineberry, C., & Bullock, D. (1980).Jobs aids. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Lord, D. (1979).Designing training environments. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  24. McCombs, B. (1986). The instructional systems development (Isd) model: A review of those factors critical to its successful implementation.Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 34(2), 67–81.Google Scholar
  25. McCutcheon, J., & Swartz, J. (1987). Planning for cablecast telecourses.T.H.E. Journal, 15(2), 98–102.Google Scholar
  26. Nathenson, M., & Henderson, E. (1980).Using feedback to improve learning materials. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  27. Pearlman, R. (1989). Technology: Its role in restructuring the schools.Electronic Learning, 8(8), 8–9.Google Scholar
  28. Poulton, E. C. (1972).Environment and human efficiency. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.Google Scholar
  29. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.) (1983).Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.Google Scholar
  30. Romiszowski, A. J. (1981).Designing instructional systems. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  31. Rossett, A. (1987).Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Saroyan, A., & Geis, G. (1988). An analysis of guidelines for expert reviewers.Instructional Science, 17, 101–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tennyson, R. (1977). Instructional systems: Development, evaluation and management of learning environments. In D. Trefflinger, J. Davis, & R. Ripple (Eds.),Handbook of research on teaching educational psychology. pp. 215–242. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tennyson, R. (1978). Evaluation technology in instructional development.Journal of Instructional Development, 2(1), 19–27.Google Scholar
  35. Tessmer, M. (1986). Dealing with client overload in instructional design.Educational Technology, 26(9), 35–42.Google Scholar
  36. Ullmer, E. (1989). High-tech instructional development: It's the thought that counts.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(3), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Walberg, H. J. (1979). Introduction and overview. In H. J. Walberg (Ed.),Educational environment and effects (pp. 1–11). Berkeley: McCutchan.Google Scholar
  38. Weiss, E. (1985).How to write a usable user manual. Philadelphia: ISI Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, J. A. (1989). Designing the microcomputer laboratory.Journal of Reading, Writing and Learning Disabilities, 5(1), 113–131.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, M. (1981). Environmental considerations for learning environments. In P. Sleeman & D. Rockwell (Eds.),Designing Learning Environments (pp. 93–101). New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Tessmer
    • 1
  1. 1.Instructional Design in the Department of Instructional Technology, Media and Telecommunications DivisionUniversity of Colorado at DenverDenver

Personalised recommendations