Abstract
SupposeD is a data matrix forN persons andn variables, and\(\dot D\) is the matrix obtained fromD by expressing the variables in deviation-score form. It is shown that ifD has rankr,\(\dot D\) will always have rank (r−1) ifr=N<n, otherwise it will generally have rankr. If\(\dot D\) has ranks,D will always have ranks ifs=n, but ifs<n it will generally have rank (s+1). Thus two cases can arise, Case A in whichD has rank one greater than\(\dot D\), and Case B in whichD has rank equal to\(\dot D\). Implications of this distinction for analysis of cross products versus analysis of covariances are briefly indicated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gollob, H. F. Confounding sources of variation in factor-analysis techniques.Psychological Bulletin, 1968,70, 330–344. (a)
Gollob, H. F. Rejoinder to Tucker's “Comments on confounding sources of variation in factor-analytic techniques,”Psychological Bulletin, 1968,70, 355–360. (b)
Graybill, F. A.Introduction to matrices with applications in statistics. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1969.
Harris, C. W. Relations among factors of raw, deviation and double-centered score matrices.Journal of Experimental Education, 1953,22, 53–58.
Horst, P.Matrix algebra for social scientists. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1963.
McDonald, R. P. Nonlinear factor analysis.Psychometric Monograph, 1967, Number 15.
Ross, J. Mean performance and the factor analysis of learning data.Psychometrika, 1964,29, 67–73.
Tucker, L. R. Comments on “Confounding sources of variation in factor analytic techniques.”Psychological Bulletin, 1968,70, 345–354.
Tucker, L. R., & Messick, S. An individual differences model for multidimensional scaling.Psychometrika, 1963,28, 333–367.
Weitzman, R. A. A factor analytic method for investigating differences between groups of individual learning curves.Psychometrika, 1963,28, 69–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corballis, M.C. Comparison of ranks of cross-product and covariance solutions in component analysis. Psychometrika 36, 243–249 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297845
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297845