Skip to main content
Log in

Learning from video: Factors influencing learners' preconceptions and invested mental effort

  • Research
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Explored in this article are factors that influence learners' preconceptions of television, the mental effort they invest in processing a video-based lesson, and their achievement. It is proposed that learners' preconceptions of the effort required by a medium directly influence the amount of effort they invest in processing a lesson presented through that medium, and that the amount of mental effort learners invest in a mediated lesson influences the quantity and quality of the information they gain from the lesson. Factors that influence learners' preconceptions and mental effort include the characteristics of the media, the characteristics of the task, and the characteristics of the learners. Research findings regarding learners' preconceptions of television and the mental effort expended in processing a video-based lesson are reviewed. Practical implications and issues for future research that arise from the literature are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beentjes, J. W. J. (1989). Learning from television and books: A Dutch replication study based on Salomon's Model.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(2), 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordeaux, B. R., & Lange, G. (1991). Children's reported investment of mental effort when viewing television.Communication Research, 18(5), 617–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Meyer, B. J. F., & Penland, M. J. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Muth, K. D., & Penland, M. J. (1985). Instructional objectives in text: Managing the reader's attention.Journal of Reading Behavior, 17, 101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Graesser, A. C., Glynn, S. M., Hamilton, T., & Penland, M. (1983). Use of cognitive capacity in reading: Effects of some content features of text.Discourse Processes, 6, 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Holdredge, T. S., Curry,, C., & Westbrook, R. D. (1979). Use of cognitive capacity in reading identical texts with different amounts of discourse level meaning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 262–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Muth, K. D., & Glynn, S. M. (1986). Effects of text organization on memory: Test of a cognitive effort hypothesis with limited exposure time.Discourse Processes, 9, 475–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Piha, A., Davis, J., & Wehausen, E. (1978). Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Adjunct question effects.Memory and Cognition, 6, 266–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1982). Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 421–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Westbrook, R. D., & Holdredge, T. S. (1978). Reading and cognitive capacity usage: Effects of text difficulty.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 582–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambre, M. A. (1991). Teachers' perceptions of media.International Journal of Instructional Media, 18, 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casali, J. G., & Wierwille, W. W. (1983a). A comparison of rating scale, secondary-task, physiological, and primary-task workload estimation techniques in a simulated flight task emphasizing communications load.Human Factors, 25, 623–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casali, J. G., & Wierwille, W. W. (1983b). On the measurement of pilot perceptual workload: A comparison of assessment techniques addressing sensitivity and intrusion issues.Ergonomics, 27, 1022–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, K. S. (1992). Students' perceptions of the ease of learning from computers and interactive video: An exploratory study.Journal of Educational Systems, 21, 251–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, K. S., Savenye, W. C., & Smith, P. L. (1991). Mental effort and video-based learning: The relationship of preconceptions and the effects of interactive and covert practice.Educational Technology Research and Development, 39 (1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media.Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, D. E., & Anderson, D. R. (1985). Instruction and modality effects on children's television attention and comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, E. D. (1985).The cognitive psychology of school learning. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. M., & Glaser, R. (1987). Foundations in learning research. In R. M. Gagné (Ed.),Instructional technology: Foundations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimes, T. (1990). Audio-video correspondence and its role in attention and memory.Educational Technology Research and Development, (38), 15–25.

  • Johnston, P. (1981, May).Implications of basic research for the assessment of reading comprehension (Technical Report No 206). Urbana, IL: Illinois University Center for the Study of Reading. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 201 987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kee, D. W., & Davies, L. (1990). Mental effort and elaboration: Effects of accessibility and instruction.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 264–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media.Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krendl, K. A. (1986). Media influence on learning: Examining the role of preconceptions.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 34, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krendl, K. A., & Watkins, B. (1983). Understanding television: An exploratory inquiry into the reconstruction of narrative content.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 31, 201–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, D., & Kovaric, P. (1983).Mental effort and learning from TV: Comparing expectations for PBS and commercial network programming. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Dallas, Texas.

  • Lang, A., Strickwerda, M., & Sumner, J. (1991).The effects of related and unrelated cuts on viewers' attention, processing capacity and memory: A limited capacity theory of television viewing. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Meadowcroft, J. M., & Reeves, B. (1989). Influence of story schema development of children's attention to television.Communication Research, 16, 342–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W. M., Burton, J. K., & Kelly, P. P. (1985). The effects of writing ability and mode of discourse on cognitive capacity engagement.Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 283–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, B., & Thorson, E. (1986). Watching television: Experiments on the viewing process.Communication Research, 13, 343–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, B., Thorson, E., & Schleuder, J. (1985). Message complexity and attention to television.Communication Research, 12, 427–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, B., Thorson, E., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Attention to television: Psychological theories and chronometric measures. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.),Perspectives on media effects. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1981). Introducing AIME: The assessment of children's mental involvement with television. In K. Kelly and H. Gardner (Eds.),New directions for child development: Viewing children through television. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1983a). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources.Educational Psychologist, 18, 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1983b). Television watching and mental effort: A social psychological view. In: J. Bryant and D. Anderson (Eds.),Children's understanding of television. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: The differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions.Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Leigh, T. (1984). Predispositions about learning from print and television.Journal of Communication, 34, 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeck, R. R., Ribich, F., & Ramanaiah, N. (1977). Development of a self-report inventory for assessing individual differences in learning processes.Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 413–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson, E., & Lang, A. (1992). The effects of television videographics and lecture familiarity on adult cardiac orienting responses and memory.Communication Research, 19, 346–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson E., Reeves, B., & Schleuder, J. (1985). Message complexity and attention to television.Communication Research, 12, 427–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierwille, W. W., & Connor, S. A. (1983). Evaluation of 20 workload measures using a psychomotor task in a moving-base aircraft simulator.Human Factors, 25, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierwille, W. W., Rahimi, M., & Casali, J. G. (1985). Evaluation of 16 measures of mental workload using a simulated flight task emphasizing mediational activity.Human Factors, 27, 489–502.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cennamo, K.S. Learning from video: Factors influencing learners' preconceptions and invested mental effort. ETR&D 41, 33–45 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297356

Keywords

Navigation