Abstract
An approach was developed to investigate the link between attributes of a children's radio program and children's judgments of appeal. Program tapes were divided into 28 segments and were rated for the presence of 30 attributes. Through multidimensional scaling analysis, attributes were organized into six clusters of “Superattributes” on the basis of their co-occurrence across the 28 segments. Superattributes were labeled and assigned scores that reflected the degree to which each was present in the 28 segments. A sample of 42 children 8–12 years old listened to the test tapes and provided a written judgment of their interest in the program at each segment. Results revealed that the Superattributes “Instruction,” “Intro Talk,” and “Jokes” were negatively associated with children's interest, while “Popular Music” was positively correlated with interest. In planning programs and understanding the effects of radio on children, designers and researchers should pay special attention to those formats in radio programming that are familiar to children, especially popular music and instructional material.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Action for Children's Television. (1984).Radio and children: An ACT handbook. Newtonville, MA: Action for Children's Television.
Agency for International Development. (1990). Interactive radio instruction: Confronting crisis in basic education [Science and Technology in Development Series]. Washington, DC: Author.
Alwitt, L. F., Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., & Levin, S. R. (1980). Preschool children's visual attention to attributes of television.Human Communication Research, 7(1), 52–67.
Anderson, D. R., & Levin, S. R. (1976). Young children's attention to “Sesame Street.”.Child Development, 47, 806–811.
Anderson, D., & Lorch, E. (1983). Looking at television: Action or reaction? In J. Bryant & D. Anderson (Eds.),Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 1–33). New York: Academic Press.
Bernstein, L. (1978).Design attributes of “Sesame Street” and the visual attention of preschool children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
Block, C. (1990).Educational technology: Can it improve educational quality? (Report No. 69). Arlington, VA: Clearinghouse on Development Communication.
Bryant, J., Zillman, D., & Brown, D. (1983). Entertainment features in children's educational television: Effects on attention and information acquisition. In J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson (Eds.),Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 221–238). New York: Academic Press.
Cambre, M. (1981). Historical overview of formative evaluation of instructional media products.Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(1), 3–25.
Christenson, P., & DeBenedittis, P. (1986). “Eavesdropping” on the FM band: Children's use of radio.Journal of Communication, 36(2), 27–38.
Christenson, P., & Lindloff, T. (1983). The role of audio media in the lives of children.Popular Music and Society, 9(3), 25–40.
Christenson, P., & Roberts, D. (1990).Popular music in early adolescence (Working paper commissioned by the Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development). Washington DC: Carnegie Corporation.
Coutant, F. R. (1939). Determining the appeal of special features of a radio program.Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 54–57.
Giovannoni, D. (1992).Kids and radio (Report No. 15). Washington, DC: The Corporation for Public Broadcasting.
Huston, A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1983). Children's processing of television: The informative functions of formal features. In J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson (Eds.),Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 35–67). New York: Academic Press.
Huston, A. C., Wright, J. C., Wartella, E., Rice, M. L., Watkins, B. A., Campbell, T., & Potts, R. (1981). Communicating more than content: Formal features of children's television programs.Journal of Communication, 31, 32–48.
Lesser, G. S. (1974).Children and television: Lessons from Sesame Street. New York: Vintage Books.
McKenna, L. M. (1991).The relationship between attributes of a children's radio program and appeal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Mielke, K. (1983). The educational use of prodcution variables and formative research in programming. In Meyer, M. (Ed.),Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 241–264). New York: Academic Press.
Mielke, K., & Chen, M. (1980). Making contact: Formative research in touch with children. InCTW International Research Notes, No. 3, Spring, 1980. New York: Children's Television Workshop.
Nunnally, J. (1967).Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Palmer, E. L. (1972). Formative research in the production of television for children. In D. R. Olson (Ed.),Media and symbols: The forms of expression, communication and education (pp. 303–329). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pedhazur, E. (1982).Multiple regression in behavioral research (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Peterman, J. N. (1940). The “Program Analyzer”: A new technique in studying liked and disliked items in a radio program.Journal of Applied Psychology, 24, 728–741.
Saettler, P. (1968).A history of instructional technology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Salomon, G. (1987). Complexities of summative ETV evaluation: Possible solutions through a diagnostic approach. In J. Baggaley, J. Duby, & A. Lewy (Eds.),Evaluation of educational television (pp. 109–135). Johannsburg, South Africa: South African Broadcasting Corporation.
Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. W. (1981).Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications, Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Tilson, T. (in press). Instructional radio.International encyclopedia of education: Research and studies. New York: Pergamon Press.
Watt, J., & Welch, A. (1983). Effects of static and dynamic complexity on children's attention and recall of televised instruction. In J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson (Eds.),Children's understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension (pp. 69–102). New York: Academic Press.
WXPN. (1988). Grant application to the William Penn Foundation, the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McKenna, L.M. The relationship between attributes of a children's radio program and its appeal to listeners. ETR&D 41, 17–28 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297089
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297089