Educational Technology Research and Development

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 80–86 | Cite as

Elaborating the elaboration theory

  • Charles M. Reigeluth
Development Commentary


In this article, the author comments on the preceding article, “A Critical Review of Elaboration Theory,” by Brent Wilson and Peggy Cole


Critical Review Educational Technology Preceding Article Elaboration Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beissner, K., & Reigeluth, C. M. (1987).Multiple strand sequencing using the elaboration theory. ERIC Document ED314025.Google Scholar
  2. Bunderson, C. V., Gibbons, A. S., Olsen, J. B., & Kearsley, G. P. (1981). Work models: Beyond instructional objectives.Instructional Science, 10, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton, R. R., Brown, J. S., & Fischer, G. (1984) Skiing as a model of instruction. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.),Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 139–150). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, A., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). A cognitive theory of inquiry teaching. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Merrill, P. F. (1978). Hierarchical and information processing task analysis: A comparison.Journal of Instructional Development, 1(2), 35–40.Google Scholar
  7. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989).The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Posner, G. J., & Rudnitsky, A. N. (1986).Course design: A guide to curriculum development for teachers (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  9. Putnam, R. W. (1991). Recipes and reflective learning: “What would prevent you from saying it that way?” In D. A. Schön (Ed.),The reflective turn: Case studies in and on reflective practice (pp. 145–163). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Reigeluth, C. M. (1987). Lesson blueprints based on the elaboration theory of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Reigeluth, C. M., & Darwazeh, A. N. (1982). The elaboration theory's procedure for designing instruction: A conceptual approach.Journal of Instructional Development, 5, 22–32.Google Scholar
  12. Reigeluth, C. M., & Kim, Y. (1991).The elaboration theory: Task/content analysis and sequencing. Presentation at the annual meeting of the Association of Educational Communications and Technology, Orlando, 1991.Google Scholar
  13. Reigeluth, C. M., & Merrill, M. D. (1984).Extended task analysis procedure: User's manual. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  14. Reigeluth, C. M., & Rogers, C. A. (1980). The elaboration theory of instruction: Prescriptions for task analysis and design.NSPI Journal, 19, 16–26.Google Scholar
  15. Reigeluth, C. M., & Stein, F. S. (1983). Elaboration theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Scandura, J. M. (1973).Structural learning (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Schank, R. C., & Jona, M. Y. (1991). Empowering the student: New perspectives on the design of teaching systems.The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1(1), 7–35.Google Scholar
  18. Schön, D. (1987).Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1986).Progressions of quantitative models as a foundation for intelligent learning environments. [Technical Report #6277]. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek & Newman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Educational Communications and Technology 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles M. Reigeluth
    • 1
  1. 1.Indiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations