Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design

  • Development
  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Jasper Woodbury Problem Solving Series is an example of a video-based instructional macrocontext for complex problem generation and problem solving. The Jasper series and curricular materials are described and illustrated in this article. The theoretical framework underlying the series includes assumptions about educational goals and the nature of learning, including the importance of generative activities and cooperative learning situations. The authors argue that the Jasper series affords generative and cooperative learning activities in a way that traditional mathematics problem-solving materials do not. However, whether these features are utilized depends on the teaching model at work in the classroom. Three models of teaching—basics first, structured problem solving, and guided generation—that can be applied to the Jasper series are outlined. The strengths and weaknesses of each are discussed, and associated assessment issues are raised. The article concludes by pointing to the need for research on the impact of differing instructional design decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, L., Kasserman, J., Yearwood, A., Perfetto, G., Bransford, J., & Franks, J. (1988). The effects of facts versus problem-oriented acquisition.Memory & Cognition, 16, 167–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989).Science for all Americans: A project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, H. S. (1985).How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borasi, R. (1987, November). Exploring mathematics through the analysis of errors.For the Learning of Mathematics, 7(3), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borasi, R. (in press).Learning mathematics through inquiry: A study of practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinmann Educational Books.

  • Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Morris, C. D., & Stein, B. S. (1979). Some general constraints on learning and research. In L. S. Cermak and F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels of processing and human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., & Sherwood, R. D. (1989). New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can't be told. In S. Vosniadou and A. Ortony (Eds.),Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 470–497). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Goin, L. I., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., Sherwood, R. D., & Williams, S. M. (1988). Learning with technology: Theoretical and empirical perspectives.Peabody Journal of Education, 64(1), 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Goldman, S. R., & Vye, N. J. (in press). Making a difference in people's abilities to think: Reflections on a decade of work and some hopes for the future. In L. Okagaki & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.),Directors of development: Influences on children. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R., Hasselbring, T., Kinzer, C., & Williams, S. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.),Cognition, education, and multimedia: Explorations in high technology (pp. 115–142). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R., Vye, N., & Rieser, J. (1986). Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations.American Psychologist, 41(10), 1078–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984).The IDEAL problem solver. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D., & Vye, N. J. (1989). A perspective on cognitive research and its implications for instruction. In L. Resnick and L. E. Klopfer (Eds.),Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 173–205). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. I., & Walters, M. I. (1983).The art of problem posing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, R., & Silver, E. A. (Eds.). (1988).The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council for Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T., Bassok, M., Lewis, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems.Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (1982). Algebra word problem solutions: Thought processes underlying a common misconception.Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991a).Video environments for connecting mathematics, science, and other disciplines. Paper presented at the Wingspread Conference on Integrated Science and Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Racine, WI.

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991b). Technology and the design of generative learning environments.Educational Technology, 31(5), 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (in press-a). Anchored instruction approach to cognitive skills acquisition and intelligent tutoring. In W. Regian & V. J. Shute (Eds.),Cognitive approaches to automated instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (in press-b). The Jasper series: A generative approach to improving mathematical thinking. InThis year in school science 1991. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

  • Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (in press-c). Anchored instruction and science education. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.),Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice. New York: SUNY Press.

  • Cole, M., & Griffin, P. (Eds.) (1987).Contextual factors in education. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosden, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Hine, M. S. (1990). Learning handicapped students' interactions during a microcomputer-based writing activity.Journal of Special Education Technology, 10, 220–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, S. (1933):How we think: Restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. (1991). An instructional designer's view of constructivism.Educational Technology, 31(5), 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R., & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing.Educational Researcher, 18, 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordance. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.),Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Analogical problem solving.Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. R., Mertz, D. L., & Pellegrino, J. W. (1989). Individual differences in extended practice functions and solution strategies for basic addition facts.Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 481–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. R., Pellegrino, J. W., & Bransford, J. (in press). Assessing programs that invite thinking. In H. O'Neill & E. Baker (Eds.),Technology assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Goldman, S. R., Pellegrino, J. W., & Mertz, D. L. (1988). Extended practice of basic addition facts: Strategy changes in learning disabled students.Cognition & Instruction, 5, 223–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S. R., Vye, N. J., Williams, S. M., Rewey, K., Pellegrino, J. W., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991, April).Solution space analyses of the Jasper problems and students' attempts to solve them. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Hanson, N. R. (1970). A picture theory of theory meaning. In R. G. Colodny (Ed.),The nature and function of scientific theories (pp. 233–274). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasselbring, T., Sherwood, R., Bransford, J., Fleenor, K., Griffith, D., & Goin, L. (1988). An evaluation of a level-one instructional videodisc program.Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 16(2), 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, M. S., Goldman, S. R., & Cosden, M. A. (1990). Error monitoring by learning handicapped students.Journal of Special Education, 23, 407–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J. (1979). Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model and memory experiments. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.),Levels and processing in human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipman, M. (1985). Thinking skills fostered by philosophy for children. In J. Segal, S. Chipman, & R. Glaser (Eds.),Thinking and learning skills: Relating instruction to basic research (Vol. 1, pp. 83–108). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockhart, R. S., Lamon, M., & Gick, M. L. (1988). Conceptual transfer in simple insight problems.Memory & Cognition, 16, 36–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLarty, K., Goodman, J., Risko, V., Kinzer, C. K., Vye, N., Rowe, D., & Carson, J. (1990). Implementing anchored instruction: Guiding principles for curriculum development. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.),Literacy theory and research: Analyses from multiple paradigms (pp. 109–120). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minstrell, J. A. (1989). Teaching science for understanding. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.),Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 129–149). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1979). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989).Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1989). Instruction for self-regulated reading. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.),Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 19–39). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetto, G., Yearwood, A., Franks, J., & Bransford, J. (1987). The effects of generation on memory access.Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society, 25, 151–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, J. W., Heath, A., Warren, S., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1991, April).Collaboration at a distance: A Jasper implementation experiment in nine states. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Resnick, L. (1987).Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B., & Klopfer, L. E. (Eds.) (1989).Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (in press). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In. C. O'Connor & B. Gifford (Eds.),New approaches to testing: Rethinking aptitude, achievement and assessment. New York: National Committee on Testing and Public Policy.

  • Risko, V. J., Kinzer, C., Vye, N. J., & Rowe, D. (1990, April).Effects of videodisc macrocontexts on comprehension and composition of causally-coherent stories. Presentation at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

  • Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1989). When teams do not function the way they ought to.International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1991). Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: A challenge for the design of new knowledge media.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1985). Fostering the development of self-regulation in children's knowledge processing. In S. F. Chipman, J. W. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.),Thinking and learning skills: Research and open questions (Vol. 2, pp. 563–578). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schank, R. C., & Jona, M. Y. (1991). Empowering the student: New perspectives on the design of teaching systems.Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 7–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985).Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). Problem solving in context(s). In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.),The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (Vol. 3, pp. 82–92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council for Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.),Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 83–103). Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, J. J. (1960). What do scientists do?Behavioral Science, 5, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. A. (1990, April).Discussant: Reflections on directions of mathematics curriculum reform from the cognitive and social sciences. Invited address at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.

  • Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. L., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains.Educational Technology, 31(5), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Haneghan, J., Barron, L., Young, M., Williams, S., Vye, N., & Bransford, J. (in press). The Jasper Series: An experiment with new ways to enhance mathematical thinking. In D. Halpern (Ed.),Concerning: The development of thinking skills in the sciences and mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Van Lehn, K. (1990).Mind bugs: The origins of procedural misconceptions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lehn, K., & Brown, J. S. (1980). Planning nets: A representation for formalizing analogies and semantic models for procedural skills. In R. E. Snow, P. A. Federico, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Cognitive process analyses of learning and problem-solving (Vol. 2, pp. 95–137). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vye, N. J., Sharp, D. M., McCabe, K., & Bransford, J. D. (in press). Discussion: Exploring a reasoning-based program for teaching arithmetic. In B. Means (Ed.),Models for teaching advanced skills to disadvantaged students. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N. (1929).The aims of education. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E., Cobb, P., Wood, T., Wheatley, G., & Merkel, G. (1990). The importance of social interaction in children's construction of mathematical knowledge. InTeaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s. 1990 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 12–21). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Consortia

Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt

Additional information

Members of the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt who contributed to this paper are Linda Barron, John Bransford, Olin Campbell, Ben Ferron, Laura Goin, Elizabeth Goldman, Susan Goldman, Ted Hasselbring, Allison Heath, Charles Kinzer, James Pellegrino, Kirsten Rewey, Robert Sherwood, Nancy Vye, Susan Warren, Susan Williams.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. The Jasper experiment: An exploration of issues in learning and instructional design. ETR&D 40, 65–80 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296707

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296707

Keywords

Search

Navigation