Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian factor analysis for multilevel binary observations

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multilevel covariance structure models have become increasingly popular in the psychometric literature in the past few years to account for population heterogeneity and complex study designs. We develop practical simulation based procedures for Bayesian inference of multilevel binary factor analysis models. We illustrate how Markov Chain Monte Carlo procedures such as Gibbs sampling and Metropolis-Hastings methods can be used to perform Bayesian inference, model checking and model comparison without the need for multidimensional numerical integration. We illustrate the proposed estimation methods using three simulation studies and an application involving student's achievement results in different areas of mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert, J., & Chib, S. (1993). Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 669–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, J., & Chib, S. (1995). Bayesian residual analysis for binary response regression models.Biometrika, 82, 747–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arminger, G., & Muthén B. (1998). A Bayesian approach to nonlinear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm.Psychometrika, 63, 271–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D.J. (1980). Factor analysis for categorical data.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 42, 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D.J. (1981). Posterior analysis of the factor model.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D.J. (1984). Scaling binary data using a factor model.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 46, 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D.J. (1987).Latent variable models and factor analysis, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, N.G., Cowles, M.K., & Vines, S.K. (1995).CODA: Convergence diagnostics and output analysis software for Gibbs sampler output, Version 0.3. (Tech. Rep.). Cambridge, UK: Biostatistics Unit-MRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R.D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm.Psychometrika, 46, 443–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R.D., & Gibbons, R.D., (1996). High-dimensional multivariate probit analysis.Biometrics, 52, 1183–1194.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S.P., & Gelman, A. (1998). General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations.Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 7, 434–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S.P., & Roberts, G.O. (in press). Assessing convergence of Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms.Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics.

  • Chambers, R.G. (1982). Correlation coefficients from 2 × 2 tables and from biserial data.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 35, 216–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Ming-Hui, & Dey, D.K. (1998). Bayesian modeling of correlated binary responses via scale mixture of multivariate normal link functions.Sankhya, Series A, 60, 322–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Ming-Hui, & Schmeiser, B.W. (1993). Performance of the Gibbs, Hit-and-Run, and Metropolis Samplers.Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2, 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1995). Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm.American Statistician, 49, 327–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chib, S., & Greenberg, E. (1998). Analysis of Multivariate Probit Models.Biometrika, 85(2), 347–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christofferson, A. (1975). Factor analysis of dichotomized variables.Psychometrika, 40, 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, M.K., & Carlin, B.P. (1996). Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: a comparative review.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 883–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosswhite, F.J., Dossey, J.A., Swafford, J.O., McKnight, C.C., & Cooney, T.J. (1985).Second International Mathematics Study: Summary report for the United States. Champaign, IL: Stipes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M.H., & Dey, Dipak K. (1998). Bayesian analysis of correlated binary data models.Sankhya, Series A, 60, 322–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A.E. (1996). Model determination using sampling-based methods. In W.R. Gilks, S. Richardson, & D. J. Spiegelhalter (Eds.),Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice (pp. 145–161). London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A.E., & Smith, A.F.M. (1990). Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 972–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J.B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. R. (1996). Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness (with discussion).Statistica Sinica, 6, 733–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Rubin, D.R. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences (with discussion).Statistical Science, 7, 457–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geman S., & Geman, D. (1984). Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions and the Bayesian Restoration of Images.IEEE Transactions of Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6, 721–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geweke, J. (1992). Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments (with discussion). In J. M. Bernardo et al. (Eds.),Bayesian Statistics 4 (pp. 156–163). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, C.J. (1992). Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo (with discussion).Statistical Science, 7, 473–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, H., & McDonald, R.P. (1988). A general model for the analysis of multilevel data.Psychometrika, 53, 455–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kass, R.E., & Raftery, A.E. (1995). Bayes factors.Journal of American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-Y (1981). A Bayesian approach to confirmatory factor analysis.Psychometrika, 46, 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longford, N.T., & Muthén, B. (1992). Factor analysis for clustered observations.Psychometrika, 57, 581–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardia, K.V. (1970).Families of bivariate distributions, London: Griffin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.K. & McDonald, R.P. (1975). Bayesian estimation in unrestricted factor analysis; a treatment for Heywood cases.Psychometrika, 40, 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R.P., & Goldstein, H. (1989). Balanced versus unbalanced designs for linear structural relations in two-level data.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 214–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1978). Contributions to factor analysis of dichotomous variables.Psychometrika, 43, 551–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1979). A structural probit model with latent variables.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 807–811.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical and continuous latent variable indicators.Psychometrika, 49, 115–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1987).LISCOMP: Analysis of linear structural equations with a comprehensive measurement model (User's Guide). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations.Psychometrika, 54, 557–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1994). Multilevel covariance structure analysis.Sociological Methods & Research 22, 376–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Christofferson, A. (1981). Simultaneous factor analysis of dichotomous variables in several groups.Psychometrika, 46, 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Satorra, A. (1989). Multilevel aspects of varying parameters in structural models. In R. D. Bock (Ed.),Multilevel analysis of educational data (pp. 87–99). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, S.K. (1998). Bayesian estimation and model choice in item response models (Tech. Rep.). Cardiff, Wales, UK: Cardiff University, School of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, J., & Lee, S.-Y. (1997). A Bayesian estimation of factor score in confirmatory factor model with polytomous, censored or truncated data.Psychometrika, 62, 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, M.A., & Wong, W.H. (1987). The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation (with discussion).Journal of American Statistical Association, 82, 528–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, L. (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions (with discussion),Annals of Statistics, 22, 1701–1762.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asim Ansari.

Additional information

The authors thank Ian Westbury, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign for kindly providing the SIMS data for the application.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ansari, A., Jedidi, K. Bayesian factor analysis for multilevel binary observations. Psychometrika 65, 475–496 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296339

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296339

Key words

Navigation