Advertisement

Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 423–429 | Cite as

Total ozone response to major geomagnetic storms during non-winter period

Article

Summary

This paper is a continuation of the recent studies of ozone response to major geomagnetic storms, now for the non-winter period. No significant response was found under different solar cycle/QBO conditions due to a rather homogeneous distribution of ozone during this period. Nevertheless, locations of the largest ozone variability are the same as the centers of meteorological activity and closely related to the centers of quasi-persistent extremes in the geographical distribution of total ozone along latitudinal circle 50 N.

Keywords

Ozone Geographical Distribution Structural Geology Significant Response Homogeneous Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A.J. Krueger: The global distribution of total ozone: TOMS satellite measurements. Planet. Space Sci.,37 (1989), 1555–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S.D. Schubert, M.-J. Munteanu: An analysis of tropopause pressure and total ozone correlations. Mon. Weather Rev.,116 (1988), 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    L.W. Uccellini, D. Keyser, K.F. Brill, C.H. Wash: The president's day cyclone of 18–19 February 1979, Influence of upstream through amplification and associated tropopause folding on rapid cyclogenesis. Mon. Weather Rev.,113 (1985), 962–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    E.R. Reither, D.-A. Gao: Heating of the Tibetian plateau and movements of the south Asia high during spring. Mon. Weather Rev.,110 (1982), 1694–1711.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Rabbe, S.H.H. Larsen: Ozone variations in the Northern Hemisphere due to dynamic processe in the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Terr. Phys.,54 (1992).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    B.A. Tinsely, R.A. Heelis: Correlations of the Atmospheric Dynamics with Solar Activity. Evidence for convection via the solar wind, atmospheric electricity, and cloud microphysics. J. Geophys. Res.,98 (1993), 10375–10384.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A.D. Padgaonkar, B.R. Arora: Tropospheric vorticity responses to the solar magnetic structure and geomagnetic disturbances. Pure Appl. Geophys,119 (1981), 894–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Labitzke, H. vanLoon: On the association between the QBO and the extratropical stratosphere, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys.,54 (1992), 1453–1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Laštovička, J. Bremer, M. Gil: Ozone response to major geomagnetic storms. Ann. Geophysical,10 (1992), 683–689.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    P. Mlch, J. Laštovička: Can be the total ozone response to major geomagnetic storms attributed to changes in meteorological situations? Ann. Geophysical, 1993 (submitted).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Guimaraes, R. McPeters: TOMS gridded ozone data 1978 – 1988 version 6.0 and TOMS ozone imagine data 1978 – 1991, compact discs data storage, GSFC/NASA, 1991.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    The Ozone layer, Paper 6,13 (ed. Biswas 1977), Proc. of the meeting of the experts designated by governments, intergovernmental and nongovernmental organizations on the Ozone layer, UN Environmental Programme, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© StudiaGeo s.r.o 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Mlch
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Physics of the AtmosphereAcad. Sci. Czech RepublicPrague

Personalised recommendations