Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring international specialization

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Statistical indicators used to analyze international specialization are manifold. However, most of them do not measure exactly the intensity of revealed comparative advantages and do not distinguish it from other aspects such as trade performance. This paper surveys the available indicators, discriminating between trade specialization and productive specialization (the gap between domestic supply and demand). It is asserted that in order to describe the international specialization pattern of a country, it is enough to consider the product distribution of the elementary trade balances, normalized with respect to trade (trade specialization) or to internal demand (production specialization). Indeed, while the individual, normalized trade balances are only performance indicators, deviations from their average correctly measure the intensity of specialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amiti, M. "Specialization Patterns in Europe,"Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 135, 4, 1999, pp. 573–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. "Trade Liberalization and ‘Revealed’ Comparative Advantage,"The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 33, 2, 1965, pp. 99–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • __. "Tariff Reductions and Trade in Manufacturing Among the Industrial Countries,"American Economic Review, 56, 1966, pp. 466–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. E., ed.Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, H. P. "On the Theoretical Interpretation of Indices of Trade Intensity and Revealed Comparative Advantage,"Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 119, 3, 1983, pp. 464–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales.Economie Mondiale: La Montée des Tensions, Paris, France: CEPII, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagenais, M. G.; Muet, P. A., eds.International Trade Modeling, London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalum, B.; Laursen, K.; Villumsen, G. "Structural Change in OECD Export Specialization Patterns: Despecialization and ‘Stickiness’,"International Review of Applied Economics, 12, 3, 1998, pp. 423–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C., ed.Empirical Methods for International Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D.; Hine, R.; Milner, C. "Country-Specific Factors and the Pattern of Horizontal and Vertical Intraindustry Trade in the United Kingdom,"Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 130, 1, 1994, pp. 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D.; Torstensson, J. "Back to the Future: Taking Stock of Intraindustry Trade,"Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 133, 2, 1997, pp. 249–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, D.; Winters, L. A., eds.Surveys in International Trade, Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, H. G.; Lloyd, P. J. "The Empirical Measurement of Intraindustry Trade,"The Economic Record, 47, 1971, pp. 494–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • __.Intraindustry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products, London, United Kingdom: Macmillan, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, P.; Richardson, J. D., eds.International Economic Transactions: Issues in Measurement and Empirical Research, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iapadre, L. "Structural Factors and Competitiveness in International Trade: A Reformulation of the Constant Market Shares Analysis Method," proceedings from Recent Developments in International Economics, June 1995.

  • Jungmittag, A.; Grupp, A.; Hullmann, A. "Changing Patterns of Specialization in Global High-Technology Markets: An Empirical Investigation of Advanced Countries,"Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, 2, 1998, pp. 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kol, J.; Mennes, L. B. M. "Corrections for Trade Imbalance: A Survey,"Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 125, 4, 1989, pp. 703–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafay, J. "The Measurement of Revealed Comparative Advantages," in M. G. Dagenais; P. A. Muet, eds.,International Trade Modeling, London, United Kingdom: Chapman and Hall, 1992, pp. 209–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafay, J.; Herzog, C.Commerce International: La Fin des Avantages Acquis, Paris, France: Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. E.; Levinsohn, J. "International Trade Theory: The Evidence," in G. M. Grossman; K. Rogoff, eds.Handbook of International Economics, 3, Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 1995, pp. 1339–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. E.; Stern R. M.Quantitative International Economics, Chicago, IL: Aldine, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vona S. "Intraindustry Trade: A Statistical Artifact or a Real Phenomenon?,"Banco Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 43, 175, 1990, pp. 383–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • __. "On the Measurement of Intraindustry Trade: Some Further Thoughts,"Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127, 4, 1991, pp. 678–700.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iapadre, P.L. Measuring international specialization. International Advances in Economic Research 7, 173–183 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02296007

Keywords

Navigation